Valentin Felixovich Voyno-Yasenetsky: Russian Icon, Researcher

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPGz2ewseZI, finally some serious theory about the soul, body and heart. This researcher studied these entities for long and came up with these conclusions. He apparently believes that who does all the thinking is actually the soul. Co-pilot says the following about his results/thinking: "Regarding his thoughts on the body, heart, and soul, Voyno-Yasenetsky viewed a person as a triune psychosomatic organism. He described the body as the physical integrity of all organs and systems, the soul as a combination of organic and sensory perceptions, memories, thoughts, feelings, and acts, and the spirit as a smart, strong-willed, life-giving principle. He emphasized the importance of the "inner man" (spirit and soul) dominating the flesh." Because they got his name wrong in the video, I assume Co-pilot has more accurate information about him. Co-pilot says he never stated that the brain does not do the thinking. In the quote above, he seems to be saying who does the thinking is the soul. His formation seems to be in Medicine, though. Co-pilot says he is called Saint Luke as well. May God bless!

Reincarnation III: More Proof?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBoNznZXUD8 brings one more case. Also this one was something Leinha would have conversed with me about, so that it is also satanized, not a genuine case to make us prove reincarnation, unfortunately. She would have found someone to go through the library documents and put the information in his head. Besides, I now clearly remember her asking me like this, 'a man is starring at the water, what is he thinking?' I then think she thought I could have contact with the spiritual world, for some reason, like she could give me a prompt like that and the spirit would then tell me. I remember having asked her why that was important, who that man was and things like that. She told me nothing. I then said, he probably jumped in the water for you to be asking me that or something, and she then would ask me yet another question like, if I could see the water and I actually saw exactly this sight of water in my head, I now remember. She then asked for more details, if I was imagining something. The way I 'lived' life was like that, like I then simply felt that image in my head and went with it, as if it were all very natural, so that I answered I can only think that he jumped into the water. For some reason, back then, I did think it had been death, that the man had died. She then put it there just like that, what obviously does not make any sense: a person who simply jumps into the water cannot die from drowning, which is how they say he died, unless he had a heart attack already before jumping into the water. May God bless!

Reincarnation II: More Proof?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQZknnZpgDg brings the story of Ray Bryant. He would have been regressed by an hypnotherapist and he then said he was in the Crimea. They then got the name of the soldier he would have been, Reuben Stafford. They then confirmed facts with him by means of documents they were able to retrieve from the library. Ray said he had never done any research into the Crimea before that date and he described precisely how the army forces male died. The time of such events would have been after the 1900s, which means it could have been the marginal. Unfortunately, the marginal has now made me remember that also this one was me conversing with Leinha, like sorting out how it was going to be, basically, when I was little. Leinha seems to then have a relationship with this show as well. Once more, we can only get to the truths of all that matters on earth if we get Our Plan in place. May God bless!

Reincarnation: More Proof?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrcX16GOGic, so this movie brings people who ended up attending the same hypnotherapist's office. First it was Maureen Williamson. She then described things that happened more than 135 years ago in detail. After a few sessions she mentioned the name of a person who lived in the same location as hers. They went after that person and asked him to accept being hypnotized by the specialist. While under hypnosis, he told similar story, details were also compatible. Maureen then came up with yet another name from that location in yet another session. The second male initially refused to take part into such a thing, but, some three years passed, he accepted. Believe it or not, also him, under hypnosis, told similar story, details that were compatible. Maureen claimed she was married to one of them at such a time before they hypnotized him and he said the same thing under hypnosis. The name of the place the three of them, in separate sessions, told the hypnotherapist was the same, so that she looked for it on a map and the three went there. Everything they said was then confirmed. They seem to have recorded things in real time as they went to the location together, the three of them. The male who was supposed to be the husband in the past life then led them to a house and to the second level of the house, when he then pointed at a particular bedroom and said that was his. In separate, Maureen took them to the same house and pointed at the same bedroom while saying it was theirs. Since this happened 135 years ago and the marginal should have gotten his first head bug about 144 years ago, we may finally have a solid proof of reincarnation being a fact at least sometimes. According to what they say, finding out these things led to no change in their current lives, so that the function of all might have been simply telling that the wife was murdered back then. The hypnotherapist, like myself, seems to worry about the fine detail: if the two found out they were married in that life, shouldn't they be together also in this one? The answer is no, like they both came back to their respective spouses from current times. I believe we have to keep on incarnating until a few things happen and one of them is finding our half, our spiritual match. I will make us invest in research of this type during Marcia Hope as well: we should obviously make comparative studies to see if there was an improvement in the match between husband and wife this time, or in their earthly experiences/physical qualities, or in their wisdom levels, if nothing else. Material like this is rarest and we can only start studying these things seriously once God's Brainwashing is on. Another piece of information that is important from this video is that, according to their research, half of the world believes in reincarnation. They also confirm what we have already said (some evidence was presented): that the satanic bible, so the current Christian bible, had reincarnation in it for a time but those satanic things, such as inquisition, eliminated such contents/teachings. As I wrote this and gave the case as closed, that we definitely have reincarnation, the marginal made me recall Leinha talking about similar thing with me, like her asking me what could be done to impress people in what regards the topic, so that this would also have been my idea, unfortunately. They were then all bugged and Leinha would have managed the process of collection of information and insertion of images and information in their heads. The reason as to why I thought that was not possible is because I imagined she would have to have had bugged those three people from the past to learn such details. Yet that 'finally' does explain why the memories would not come for the two of them, the couple, to be together again. It is all very unfortunate. May God bless!

Longinas: The Roman Centurion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RB98-W1PuU brings the story of 'Saint' Longinas. It is all so absurd that, if nobody had told me it were possible, I wouldn't really believe. Basically, the satanic invented that the centurion who brutally attacked the side of Jesus when he was on the cross, making Jesus' body expel blood and water, got blessed by Jesus, like the message is basically 'attack the holy figure to get their favors'. Obviously not! That absolutely never happened. God does not have any mercy: only Jesus does. The satanic then implies that one can steal God's favors somehow, first of all, so not be a believer or a follower and still get His favors, not have minimum respect for not even the body of the holy figure and still get miracles to their side and physical violence against the holy ones is a means to get blessings. The complete inversion of all: only the satanic could do things like this, quite sincerely. Here, once more, we obviously don't have any reliable records of the history of this man on earth, Longinas, and I find it hard to believe even that one can prove that he was ever alive, like we don't even have a surname. The marginal does that repeatedly: no first name, if first name no surname, no location, no date, no time and so on, yet narratives in which we are supposed to believe as if they were real-life stories. 'My' 'grandmother', 'Maria Ribeiro Ricci', used to recite a line each time she lost something: 'Sao Longuinho' something. I now forgot her line. Basically, this 'saint' would be the one for lost items. We have already seen that saints is a wrong thing, then now I believe this 'Sao Longuinho' translates into 'Saint Longinas' and therefore you can only be joking, like this can only serve as more support to the idea that saints should all have their kingdom attacked and finished, basically.

I am thinking that if one accepts this narrative as factual, then one can easily extend the reasoning involved and therefore all atrocities against the Christians, or the holiest figures around, perpetrated by the marginal are made acceptable and still very logically justified: they could then enjoy our blessings. Oh, God!

Herman The Recluse: Czech Republic Icon, Religion (The Devil's Bible Writer)

We hear about this figure when watching the YouTube video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0djS7abKM. He is then told to have been a Benedictian Monk who had been condemned to be bricked alive and starved to death (is this really something that can be told in books and not lead to the end of the Catholic Church, I wonder), yet nobody is able to tell what sin he committed, not even that. This man would then have proposed a deal to the abbot of the monastery: that he gave him one day for him to write a book containing all knowledge available in human kind in exchange for saving his life. Unable to write everything in time, he appeals to the devil and the devil then helps him write the Codex Gigas, a 75 Kg tome. The problems with this are several: Wikipedia has a different report and says that the deal was 1 year instead of 1 day and that is way more reasonable and a person could definitely have the time to write this tome in one year. All the knowledge of human kind resumed to only a few areas of knowledge, as we see mentioned in the own video, so that it was, by no means, all knowledge available. Besides, the contents of the book are clearly plagiarism, as we can read from Co-pilot: "The "Devil's Bible," also known as the Codex Gigas, is a large medieval manuscript created around the early 13th century. It contains a variety of texts, including:

The Complete Latin Bible: Both the Old and New Testaments in the Vulgate version.

Works of Flavius Josephus: "Antiquities of the Jews" and "The Jewish War".

Isidore of Seville's Encyclopedia: "Etymologiae".

Chronicle of Cosmas of Prague: "Chronica Boemorum".

Medical Texts: An early version of the "Ars medicinae" compilation of treatises, and two books by Constantine the African.

Other Texts: Various shorter texts on topics such as penitence and exorcism.

The Codex Gigas is also famous for its full-page portrait of the Devil, which is where it gets its nickname. Despite its ominous name, the manuscript is a remarkable piece of medieval literature and art."

The portrait of the devil is absolutely ridiculous, like a cartoon sort of thing.

I am sure, after examining the information available to us, that this book was no miracle, was written in one year (consisted of simply copying the work of others!), and does not contain the full knowledge of human kind from that time, like there are many things that were known at that time that are not present, such as Engineering and Architeture.

In this case, the monk got revolted with his monastery and called the abbot devil, since he had a deal with him instead. There is nothing that he has written in the devil's bible that implies he got it through a deal with the devil and he was a benedictian monk, so that this is like 99.9% unlikely. To become this type of monkey, according to Co-pilot, he would have studied at least 5 full years the liturgy of the Catholic Church, which means heaviest brainwashing as possible against the devil. It is realistically impossible that this man would have said he got the book through the devil or any agreement with it. Saying that is again satanism: that is a satanic narrative of the life of this man, for God's sake. We don't say such a thing about people unless we are absolutely sure, specially about people who are supposed to be those who least sin on earth. No, please, let's fix this one more biography. The video further states that it was weird that the book was written on vellum, which is animal skin. Yet, I asked Co-pilot and it told me that that was common practice back then, so that there is nothing special about that either. The video then says that the book would take a normal person 20 to 30 years to write, yet, in the same way we have reports on it taking 1 day, we have reports on it taking 1 year, so that we may as well say anyone could have said 20 years and it would be all the same, quite sincerely, like we don't have anything proving that the book started being written at a certain date and had its last page written at another, so that it is all guesses. The presenter states that if Herman had taken 30 years to write the book then the book would present change of calygraphy style somewhere but it doesn't. Co-pilot helps with this one: "(I asked if there is any book written by human hands during a period of more than ten years that presented no change in size or shape of letter) One example is the Book of Kells, an illuminated manuscript Gospel book in Latin, containing the four Gospels of the New Testament. It was created around 800 AD and is known for its intricate and consistent calligraphy, although it was likely produced by multiple scribes over several years." Basically, we get to know that the writing was 'the same' even though the scribes were different, so that there the argument is stopped. The presenter also talks about ermine loincloth having been used to cover the genitalia of Herman's drawing of the devil as being something special, as if he revered the devil since the royals were told to dress in such fabric. Well, I consulted Co-pilot and found out that the ecclesiastic garnments were made of those when the priests had highest ranks. In this case, he was probably calling the abbot a devil if the fabric of the nappies of the devil are supposed to mean something. I observe however that my first impression was that of a ridiculous figure, so that I see absolutely no respect for the devil whatsoever and, if for the presenter, that looks like a royal attire, to me it looks like nappies, calling the devil a retarded person, which I do think is adequate, a person who did not grow up. The presenter also talks about 10 missing pages of the book possibly containing he devil's prayer and, because of that, having been removed: Mary Madaglene's book had 9 pages missing and nobody ever said that about hers. Mark's gospel is missing entirely and again nothing like that was invented, so that there is no reason for such a belief. As a last point, though, worth adding, his book has nothing to praise the devil or his creations or rhetoric, so that we should definitely change its name, from devil's bible to Herman's Book or something. May God bless!

Christoph Heizmann: Austrian Icon, Painter

This YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0djS7abKM, says this man signed actual paper contracts with the devil and even though he met the devil and the image of the devil was human, the pact he then acquired with him, of being given talent and fame for his paintings for 9 years, returned nothing in practice to him, like he still had the same mediocre performance during those 9 years. The devil would have said he would come after his soul after 9 years and Christoph started having convulsions exactly 9 years after the contract was made. He signed two contracts: one by ink and another by blood. Freud would have examined him and determined he had a mental problem instead of a genuine experience with the beyond. It seems unreasonable that an entity that does not belong to this world would ask for contracts that belong to it. To make it worse, we never see the devil signing those in any of the reports on paper contracts with him, but, if he demands such, it would be expected that he would also sign them, isn't it? Well, once more, the devil doesn't wait: he puts the soul immediately in hell. I don't believe on a single apparition of a single 'saint': first of all, saints are not creatures of God. They are creatures of the Catholic Church. As such, they don't have such power. Notice here that, if such a thing existed, and therefore if the Catholic church ever represented God on earth (since that is definitely their claim and attitude), such a thing would always have existed. Yet, as far as we know, apparitions of saints 'exotically' coincide with the start of existence of the Catholic Church (it is like this: you only learn if you are wise. On AD 30-33, according to Co-pilot, the (Roman: therefore that one, of Joseph of Arimathea) Catholic Church starts. On AD 40, the first ever recorded apparition of a saint is recorded. God!!!). It also looks like one more flavor of the 'same': putting together a satanic book and imposing it to the Christian churches as the only truth. In this case, Christoph never actually saw the saint in question. Everyone else who had a pact with the devil claims to have received what they asked in return, so that this is also not matching history of contact with the devil that we know about. That is then, all together, perhaps plus some extra, what led 'Freud' to conclude it was all mental, rather than actual. We are with 'Freud' on this one too. I am not so sure about how those people would have claimed to have seen things they have not seen when they were not mentally ill. Notwithstanding, nowadays we know what the satanic did in those few cases we here studied (in these Blogger blogs), so that we imagine similar things took place: they could have done voice to skull on the people who hallucinated, those people could have simply lied to help the Catholic Church at their own will, it could be that the Catholics always kept secrecy of the important data (who saw, when, where, what time, full name and contact details of those who saw, so that we can speak to them directly) and so on. May God bless!