Tuesday, 21 January 2025
Valentin Felixovich Voyno-Yasenetsky: Russian Icon, Researcher
Monday, 20 January 2025
Reincarnation III: More Proof?
Reincarnation II: More Proof?
Reincarnation: More Proof?
Longinas: The Roman Centurion
I am thinking that if one accepts this narrative as factual, then one can easily extend the reasoning involved and therefore all atrocities against the Christians, or the holiest figures around, perpetrated by the marginal are made acceptable and still very logically justified: they could then enjoy our blessings. Oh, God!
Herman The Recluse: Czech Republic Icon, Religion (The Devil's Bible Writer)
The Complete Latin Bible: Both the Old and New Testaments in the Vulgate version.
Works of Flavius Josephus: "Antiquities of the Jews" and "The Jewish War".
Isidore of Seville's Encyclopedia: "Etymologiae".
Chronicle of Cosmas of Prague: "Chronica Boemorum".
Medical Texts: An early version of the "Ars medicinae" compilation of treatises, and two books by Constantine the African.
Other Texts: Various shorter texts on topics such as penitence and exorcism.
The Codex Gigas is also famous for its full-page portrait of the Devil, which is where it gets its nickname. Despite its ominous name, the manuscript is a remarkable piece of medieval literature and art."
The portrait of the devil is absolutely ridiculous, like a cartoon sort of thing.
I am sure, after examining the information available to us, that this book was no miracle, was written in one year (consisted of simply copying the work of others!), and does not contain the full knowledge of human kind from that time, like there are many things that were known at that time that are not present, such as Engineering and Architeture.
In this case, the monk got revolted with his monastery and called the abbot devil, since he had a deal with him instead. There is nothing that he has written in the devil's bible that implies he got it through a deal with the devil and he was a benedictian monk, so that this is like 99.9% unlikely. To become this type of monkey, according to Co-pilot, he would have studied at least 5 full years the liturgy of the Catholic Church, which means heaviest brainwashing as possible against the devil. It is realistically impossible that this man would have said he got the book through the devil or any agreement with it. Saying that is again satanism: that is a satanic narrative of the life of this man, for God's sake. We don't say such a thing about people unless we are absolutely sure, specially about people who are supposed to be those who least sin on earth. No, please, let's fix this one more biography. The video further states that it was weird that the book was written on vellum, which is animal skin. Yet, I asked Co-pilot and it told me that that was common practice back then, so that there is nothing special about that either. The video then says that the book would take a normal person 20 to 30 years to write, yet, in the same way we have reports on it taking 1 day, we have reports on it taking 1 year, so that we may as well say anyone could have said 20 years and it would be all the same, quite sincerely, like we don't have anything proving that the book started being written at a certain date and had its last page written at another, so that it is all guesses. The presenter states that if Herman had taken 30 years to write the book then the book would present change of calygraphy style somewhere but it doesn't. Co-pilot helps with this one: "(I asked if there is any book written by human hands during a period of more than ten years that presented no change in size or shape of letter) One example is the Book of Kells, an illuminated manuscript Gospel book in Latin, containing the four Gospels of the New Testament. It was created around 800 AD and is known for its intricate and consistent calligraphy, although it was likely produced by multiple scribes over several years." Basically, we get to know that the writing was 'the same' even though the scribes were different, so that there the argument is stopped. The presenter also talks about ermine loincloth having been used to cover the genitalia of Herman's drawing of the devil as being something special, as if he revered the devil since the royals were told to dress in such fabric. Well, I consulted Co-pilot and found out that the ecclesiastic garnments were made of those when the priests had highest ranks. In this case, he was probably calling the abbot a devil if the fabric of the nappies of the devil are supposed to mean something. I observe however that my first impression was that of a ridiculous figure, so that I see absolutely no respect for the devil whatsoever and, if for the presenter, that looks like a royal attire, to me it looks like nappies, calling the devil a retarded person, which I do think is adequate, a person who did not grow up. The presenter also talks about 10 missing pages of the book possibly containing he devil's prayer and, because of that, having been removed: Mary Madaglene's book had 9 pages missing and nobody ever said that about hers. Mark's gospel is missing entirely and again nothing like that was invented, so that there is no reason for such a belief. As a last point, though, worth adding, his book has nothing to praise the devil or his creations or rhetoric, so that we should definitely change its name, from devil's bible to Herman's Book or something. May God bless!
Christoph Heizmann: Austrian Icon, Painter
Francesco Bartos: Italian Icon, Arts (Sculptor)
Sunday, 19 January 2025
John Lennon: English Icon, Music
Jonathan Moulton: American Icon, Army General
Holy Musical Instrument: Is that Possible?
Ancient Greek Beliefs: Musical instruments were often linked to deities and ethical attributes. Aristotle, for instance, criticized the aulos (a wind instrument) for being too exciting.
Renaissance Period: During this time, dance and music were often associated with sinful behavior. The devil was blamed for the existence of dance, and by extension, the instruments that accompanied it, including the violin.
Niccolò Paganini: The legendary violinist Niccolò Paganini (1782-1840) was rumored to have made a pact with the devil due to his extraordinary talent. His striking appearance and virtuosity fueled these rumors.
Cultural Myths: Various cultural myths and artistic depictions have contributed to this association. For example, paintings like Pieter Brueghel's "The Triumph of Death" and Hendrik Goltzius's "Couple Playing, with Death Behind" depict the devil playing a violin-like instrument.
The combination of these factors has cemented the violin's reputation as the devil's instrument in popular culture." We here read that there was never a statement coming from the devil saying the violin belonged to him and, as with God, why would we care otherwise? A striking appearance and virtuosity is what would have 'reinforced' that: I am sorry, but that would also come from God, perhaps the description here is a bit satanized, so say glowing appearance instead. As for the art pieces, why should we allow those to exist or be around? Painting of the devil? God really does not like this sort of thing: only one God and that is Him. No art, at most books with illustrations or something, so that we see the devil's face, yet the devil has incarnated in the shape of 'my' 'father', therefore we know his shape and it has nothing to do with those. Hopefully he will still be alive and well when we get to Marcia Hope's time, so that we can interview him, since the satellite thing is already going to be on, and he is then going to tell us all and in those things we will be able to believe, at such time.
We tend to associate harps with God, though, like the praise from Psalms/bible appears associated with those. Would it then be the case that all praise should be done with the aid of harps if we sing it? Probably not. I am sure God prefers no instrument because those may come on the way to sincerity and grandiosity of the praise. A person who is creating the song as it goes or playing an instrument should not be able to think deeply about the words they are saying, yet that is a necessity for a good praise, as we saw (meaning those in my head) recently. We really need to feel the things we say, to the level of that 'knowing' of 'Jung' for it to be something Our God appreciates.
It also seems to be the case that music is for our entertainment, a gift from Our God, and the way we please Him is with actions, sacrifices and compliance instead. It seems that when the Ancient people, from Psalms, classified a praise as good, that was something to do with the music as well and their personal taste, therefore the person who is playing is then not worrying only about God, but also about the crowd that watches, what destroys the purity of the act of praise, like it is now polluted by the intentions of pleasing humans but, as 'Mother Theresa' said, it should be about us and God only.
Now, we do notice the person the YouTube refers to, in what regards reinforcement of the satanic theory, that the violin belongs to the devil, is a bit ugly, like he looks like 'Murillo', so has that enormous chin and so on, which could mean deformity or satanic looks (yet, I have never seen satan, so how can I tell if he is ugly or beautiful? At most I think black 'Nelson' is satan and he is not that ugly), yet he seems clean and tidy, even slim, and obesity does reinforce uglyness plus is satanic, since it means you overeat and do not exercise, therefore you do not take care of the house of your soul. Well, the man, according to the picture they present, is slim, actually very slim, clean and tidy in all his looks and at most he wears always black, as the presenter says, but then don't priests and Orthodox Jews also do that? We are used to be told they are holiest instead, so that black doesn't seem to mean satanic, like it is just one more color and it usually makes us become more elegant in presentation than the white color, usually associated with angels. Yet, black does close things and makes us less likely to receive good energy from the person, like it seems to block the transmission of energy from one being to another somehow and, indeed, they say the color black, in science, blocks the sun, so the light, which is usually associated with God. We also chose to dress black in funerals and we chose to say funerals are a reason for mourning instead of joy, so that it does not really make sense associating the same color to God's people. Then, once more, we have proven here that priests and Jews CANNOT be God's people and that may then match their choice of colors, finally, since God writes straight through tortuous lines. As another point, by giving him the gift of good music, God is making people stop noticing his ugly features, so say his chin, and connect to him via the sound of his soul instead and therefore he is being more blessed by God for some reason. The reason shouldn't ever be that he is demoniac, therefore we may cross that one out, please. I also observe that they have another picture of his in the beginning of the report and that one brings him wearing some white at the top, so that the claim is not even true, that he was always wearing black. The story involving the homicide is obviously not true, since we cannot even imagine how one can use intestines as strings of violin, please. Also, no human being should have the power to steal our souls: at most the devil, so the satanic system, these devices and so on. Now, it may be true that he was womanizing and drinking alcohol in excess, in case Our God could withdraw part or all of his blessing. Since they say he even played better or something, then he wasn't really womanizing or doing anything evil from that alcohol drinking habit. They invented all this, in the same way they invented the homicide. It is all satanic narrative. Then it is said that he died of cancer and refused the priest by the time of death. It might be that God punished him through the painful disease in that case, so while alive, and the priests are satanic creatures, so that refusing them should have no connection to being demoniac, like perhaps he could see beyond the established rules and that could imply even the opposite. They say his body was refused by the church and went around for a long time until 'the pope' forgave 'him'. Oh, God, what a long satanic string: a body contains no soul and therefore it makes no sense bothering about it but we decided, for hygiene and mourning purposes, to keep it intact and buried somewhere. The pope is an authority established by humans, not by God, and therefore he never had the rights to forgive the sins of anyone on earth: that is obviously only with the Lord and it is highest blasphemy to imagine they someday had this power. Shocking that these things would mean, so far, that this man was demoniac instead of most blessed. Notice, though, that you cannot get confused: the devil has been giving the essence of the original person to the usurper in some cases and that is then when God most worries about His kids, since he is protecting their history on earth in what regards at least a few things that mattered the most for us, humans, he is again using that usurper so that they still glorify the name/id of His creature, despite them being dead. We then imagine the IDs the devil preserves are those of the most gifted, most blessed by God, and those could then have their souls collected by God at that time, which was the time God decided meant completion of their cycle of evolution, more than likely, when they should then join Him and His wife in the Elohim Planet or paradise. May God bless!
Bernard Fokke: Frisian Icon, Navigator
Friday, 17 January 2025
Books
Accidentally, we mentioned 'love' trying to make a comparison, but twin was probably not watching, so that I ended up misusing the word. That led to us having to define what 'love' is, since this is one of the words of the devil, which caused a lot of trouble: love, in the case of God, so what Our Lord understands as love, is compliance, as we saw that man saying on the YouTube on one of these blogs. Love, in a coupleship, means spiritual completion. Love for a relative means treating them as if they were a fellow in Christ even when they are not such. Love for human kind means sacrificing yourself in the name of positively and meaningfully contribute to human kind's existence, so that a researcher should always be told to love human kind, unless what they produce misleads, as in satanism. Love for the world is doing your best to preserve it as beautiful and nice as possible. Love for yourself is what shouldn't exist: God should love you, it is between you and Him, so that you don't love yourself, God will love you according to your deeds, behavior, sacrifices in His name, the beauty of your praise (and that has to do with feeling it in your flesh) and so on. The others will love you according to the love of God for you since the Holy Ghost will then embelish you, like you get sparkles in your eyes, a superior or more attractive aura, more beauty in your physical body, more beauty on your hair and so on. Love for your neighbor is respect and care: respect for the rules and laws while interacting with them, respect for their feelings, attention to their wants, respect for their issues, so if they tell you the music is too loud, you go and put it down immediately, since that is bothering them somehow, even if that is because they are in a bad mood, and so on. Care for when they are fainting or screaming or asking for your aid, say for things such as keeping their postal items while they travel or feeding their pet. Love for your church or workplace is helping the official carers in whatever you can, doing what they are not doing to keep the places in order, beautiful and pleasant and so on. Love for your kids is respect and care again, so never hurting their feelings, never violating them, never committing violence of any kind against them, making sure they have enough food and clothes and shoes and studies and support in life up to the age of legal majority and so on.
As another point, the beard and mustache of Jesus and his followers would have also been invented by Joseph, the Roman officer, because of the deity he adored, which should be either Baal or Yahweh but could also be someone else. We are sure that, as soon as we have God's Brainwashing going, we should be able to locate this deity/demon. A forked long beard and perhaps a long black vest will be part of the visual of this creature from hell, whoever they may be. In this case, our Jesus had a super clean face, since that has to be better for everyone who speaks to him and to attract newcomers. The followers of Jesus should be plenty, instead of only 12, so that they may have any looks they like, but perhaps majorly clean shaven if they are males. The oldest people I accompanied going to church would be those portrayed in the movies I watched when little and those usually had clean face, since that is best, so that it is simply logical to infer they were all clean shaven or almost all of them. I couldn't locate any text giving the physical appearance of the Jews back then, yet it is all satanized. There are no pictures, only paintings and drawings, and those are apparently made many years later, like the paintings involving Christ, so perhaps more than one millennia later. In this case, one can invent whatever they like about how they looked and impose that as a rule to the Jews by the time of at most Inquisition, which I think I am sure is what happened here. There seems to be no citation, also in their books (consulted Co-pilot) in what regards having a forked long beard or even having a beard, dressing long vests, which are still black, nothing. The Romans satanized all in those regards is my modest conclusion.
Thursday, 16 January 2025
Hell: Fact or Fiction
Here I got my original words for this passage: https://biblehub.com/matthew/10-28.htm#lexicon (it is at the bottom of the page). We then understand that the authorities in hell, whoever they may be, have the power of destroying all that means your individuality, which means you may then lose your eternal life or have your permanent death through their hands.
I tried Co-pilot and got this upon asking "does the bible say that demons are fallen angels or that is inferred somehow, then how":
"Isaiah 14:12-15: This passage describes the fall of a being referred to as "Lucifer," who is often associated with Satan. It speaks of this being's pride and fall from heaven. Ezekiel 28:12-17: This passage addresses the "king of Tyre" but is often interpreted as a description of Satan's fall from grace due to his pride and rebellion. Revelation 12:7-9: This passage describes a war in heaven in which Michael and his angels fight against the dragon (interpreted as Satan) and his angels. The dragon and his angels are defeated and cast out of heaven to the earth. 2 Peter 2:4: This passage mentions that God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them into hell and delivered them into chains of darkness. Jude 1:6: This passage speaks of angels who did not keep their proper domain but left their own abode, and are reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day." We then clearly see a plethora of creatures from hell: a dragon (interpreting that as satan simply means they invented that that was satan), king of tyre (again, interpreting as satan means inventing it is when it isn't, just like it was with the variety of gods in the bible, when they reduced that to one) and Lucifer. Yet, there is still satan and the devil in the bible, so that, just like the gods, which are plenty, the Elohim society, with us simply getting one that is kind to us or give us attention, we have plenty of actors from hell. I tried Co-pilot again for this one, and asked "does the bible mention a hierarchy between satan, the devil, lucifer, the dragon and the king of tyre or we could interpret them to be all authorities in hell". It answered: "Satan: Often depicted as the primary adversary of God and the ruler of evil forces. The Devil: Another name for Satan, often used to emphasize his role as a tempter and deceiver. Lucifer: A name derived from a passage in Isaiah 14:12-15, traditionally interpreted to refer to the fall of a once-glorious angel who becomes Satan. The Dragon: Symbolically represents Satan in the Book of Revelation (e.g., Revelation 12:9). The King of Tyre: Mentioned in Ezekiel 28:12-17, often interpreted allegorically to describe Satan's pride and fall from grace." We then understand that if satan means top authority in hell, they all are such, like after we slightly desatanize their rhetoric.
I did consult Kardec on this one and got that "only a part of the devils are in Hell; the rest of them are roving about in freedom, intermeddling with all that is going on upon the Earth, and gratifying themselves by doing evil" (https://kardecpedia.com/en/study-guide/886/heaven-and-hell-or-the-divine-justice-according-to-spiritism/6803/part-first-doctrine/chapter-ix-demons/demons-according-to-the-church). In the same paragraph, it says that the devils will exist on earth until the end of times. I disagree: I am sure we can exterminate all evil through God's Brainwashing, which should be about to happen. Yet, this part of the theory, regarding them existing until the end of times, is probably not supported by conversations with spirits that Kardec had and we have to remember here that Kardec's life was also usurped.
"They are thus, at once, the cause and the chastisers of the sins of their victims, and moreover – what human jurisprudence, imperfect though it be, would never sanction – the victim who succumbs, through weakness, to the temptation which these devils contrive to throw in his way for the express purpose of leading him astray, is punished as severely as the tempter who employs his or her superior cunning and clearness in inducing the unfortunate individual to do wrong; in fact, the victim of superior cunning and malignity is punished more severely than the tempter who misled that victim, for on quitting the Earth that individual is sent straight to Hell, from which he or she will never be let out for a single minute, and where the victim is made to suffer in its fires without a moment’s relaxation of that individual’s tortures, through all time as well as through all eternity." We then understand what I also heard from YouTube reports that a time ago I could still find: that the evil doers who became evil doers for following the rhetoric of the demons will be in hell without being left out for a single fraction of second, and will suffer in its fires, tortures for eternity. It then says that the demons themselves do not get punished. That I doubt, so that that part must have been added by the satanic after usurpation. We here observe that they say those who were cajoled by them would be paying and those that cajoled wouldn't but we, in democracy, believe those that cajole should pay higher instead. Besides, we have decided that those who are bugged in the head can easily win a case at the courts if they are able to prove brainwashing is what happened to them, what we should be able to get through God's Brainwashing and interviewing the puppeteers. There are possibilities with the potentiality of the brainwashing as well. We also talked about the change in system, so that, if the person gets arrested after confessing their crimes because they are now speaking truth, they should be in jail for at most one year, since we will then change the system through Marcia Hope and just get the perpetrators recorded as criminals, returned the original name, perhaps producing an apology to society, and brainwashed/brainedited to then be put back to society.
Basically, how can we do research and find out about hell? Obviously only contacting the dead, those who are or have been there. Who has studied life after death that we know about for longer and has left books for us to read? That was Kardec or Chico Xavier, as for what the satanic let us know, like there would be a large number of sources coming from ancient times, since we do find necromancers in the bible, Old Testament, and several ancient civilizations revered the dead or sought contact with them. Both Chico's and Kardec's lives have been usurped, as we proved here, so that it is really hard. We then imagine that the satanic specialize in destroying all possible actual knowledge about life after death and the matters of the spirit, since they would like us all to sin. If you pay attention to what I am letting you know here, you will understand their 'philosophy', so what guides them in their actions on earth: the more we sin, the closer they are to God, basically, and also the farthest they are from going to hell, like it is the usurpation thing. I say, if we can prove that an extremely large number of people have usurped, and we obviously can, people are going to be way readier to accept God's Brainwashing, which is the start of a solution, and at-most-one-year prison system (brainwashing and brainediting via bug, returning the name to the original people and whatever else society deems adequate, so say publishing a letter somewhere showing sincere repentance and will to repair human kind). The satanic then thinks: if hell gets everyone, God may change His mind, so come up with less strict rules or punishment, and perhaps find a way of having a sort of amnesty or something. I am tired of having sources disappearing on the World Wide Web as they please. May God help me and see if I can find even one survivor of a true medium's report somewhere, where they talk about at least one of the so many cases I heard about in the past, of people who have experienced hell for real, not in NDE. I also think that the right theory is that there is no spiritual experience during an NDE, since the researcher we mentioned here, Leinha let me know, found nothing for a few years and I felt nothing as I went through at least 3 NDE, having trying suicide three times through pills during this time. The Elohim obviously know the difference between an NDE and an actual death, if nothing else, like we cannot ever deceive them because, as said before, the Holy Ghost is inside of us all all the time and works like a CIA, from the time it was managed by originals, from heavens.
https://bibliotecacatolica.com.br/blog/sem-categoria/carta-de-uma-alma-condenada-ao-inferno/?srsltid=AfmBOoqzH9h7SQwbNMFmq_lSTSmsiY-3EpUw1thgIwohamyVCw5_jbnf, here we see a letter received by a Catholic nun, which was recovered after her death. A young woman she knew, called Ani, would have passed these contents to her while the nun was alive. It is in Portuguese, but I do agree that that is a description of hell, with me now believing I also had a quick glance of it at a certain stage of my life and it does coincide with large part of what it is in this letter. Scientific details are that we don't have not even the full name of the nun or of the woman or the location or the dates involved, so that this evidence is very weak, yet there is very little they let me have access to and it is kinda miracle I found this letter, so that I will talk about pieces of it that coincide with my own experience and intuition (Add 'she says that' to the beginning of every item, please):
1) Everyone hates each other ('Odiamo-nos mutuamente') and they also hate God ('Mais do que tudo, odiamos a Deus')
2) They don't love anymore ('Aqui nao amamos a ninguem mais')
3) They don't acknowledge good on anyone else ('Nos aqui nao reconhecemos bem algum em ninguem')
4) They stare, in shock, at their failed lives, howling and grinding our teeth, tormented and full of hate ('Fitamos, estarrecidos, a nossa vida falhada, uivando e rangendo os dentes, atormentados e cheios de odio')
5) All in hell think in the same way ('Pensamos todos da mesma forma'). Our will is petrified on evil ('A nossa vontade esta petrificada no mal') even when we do something good ('mesmo quando fazemos algo de bem'). As me now ('como eu agora'). We don't do good with good intentions ('Nao o fazemos com boa intencao').
6) All recollections show us that terrifying side of that being a grace that we despised. ('E todas essas lembrancas nos mostram aquele medonho lado que fora uma graca que desprezamos'). How this torment us! ('Como isso atormenta!')
7) We don't eat, we don't sleep and even less do we walk with our legs. ('Nao comemos, nao dormimos, nem andamos com as pernas')
http://crimeinthe21stcentury.blogspot.com/2025/01/jorge-lafond-brazilian-icon-tv.html brings a supposedly psychographed letter about hell, but also proof that this guy had been usurped and therefore this could never be his psychographed letter, therefore hell is not such, the misinformation campaign of satan...
https://www.amazon.com.au/Letters-Hell-C-Kollmyer/dp/1163846384 claims to bring some letters from hell with descriptions. It says 2010, which should mean sure falsehoods, since the marginal would have manipulated everything involved through the bugs and others, but the description of the book seems to state that it is a reprint, therefore maybe the original was old enough (should be from before 1880 to be something we can trust). It took me a lifetime to find this book and I had to then use the terms psychographed letter hell but I had tried a lot of other terms before that with no success, like perhaps the marginal cannot guess certain words that are present in the description of the works we look for and we then can sometimes win this race, but, without God's Brainwashing, we get nowhere, as said.
If the marginal had not satanized everything, we obviously would have become aware of many communications from the dead mentioning usurpation and apologizing for that. It is all truly satanized.
I dug and found the original letter, which we talked about earlier on here, which belonged from a Sister Claire from Germany: https://www.theworkofgod.org/Library/catholic/letter_from_hell.htm We now get a location and 2 first names, which is better than nothing. We then also get more details about their lives, like, provided we can uniquely identify this 'Claire', we are then able to get to the full name of the young woman. Still missing dates, precise addresses and so on. I also found it here: https://www.traditioninaction.org/religious/e003rp.LetterBeyond1.htm
"ROMANS 2:6-10,12
God “will give to each person according to what he has done.” (7) To those who by persistence in doing good, seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. (8) But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger. (9) There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil: first for the Jew, then for the gentile; (10) but glory, honor and peace for everyone who does good: first for the Jew, then for the gentile…(12) All who sin apart from the law will also perish apart from the law." (https://www.hellhadesafterlife.com/hell-know/what-bible-says-about-hell). We then understand that there is hell and that will be trouble and distress, wrath and anger, which matches the description of hell that the nun mentioned above received.So, hell, according to the satanic bible, is what you see in the just-mentioned link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUKisMev1XI brings a first person report on how hell feels like. He says it is as if your flesh is being ripped over and over gain, worst pain he ever felt in life. That he didn't know if it was ever gonna end. Terrible pain, agonizing thoughts. Misleading information, voices: that Jesus and God wanted that to happen to him.
Jung: I Know God
Wednesday, 15 January 2025
ζωὴν: A Word of Difference
I now theorize that what is meant is that God has a 'she in' or a she inside of Him, therefore He is one flesh with a particular she and therefore His son also has a 'she in' or a particular she inside of him. What that means is that, without the wife, they cannot tell us what is right in a perfect manner, that then being why Jesus goes to Egypt and marries first, to only then tell us The Word. As said before, God also has His Goddess and, while the hes should need their shes to be able to tell The Word, the shes should be able to tell it even without the hes (not considering or telling how painful their journey is then, so if on their own).
The sources that teach us Greek to the needed level - and in a non-satanic way - are inexistent, just like it was with Hebrew before, so in 2001. I then asked 'Trevor' for researchers to put some work into that and they did: they came up with things such as Biblehub and Bibleglot. It is impossible to believe how human kind is given to make things impossible to themselves and also to subject itself to manipulation by others, therefore allowing for their only opportunity in the current body in this world to be literally used by others instead of themselves. I still cannot believe how long it took human kind (and that happened only thanks to me, as far as I know, so that is 2001 years only for those TWO institutions) to simply start challenging the teachings, writings and practices of the Catholic Church and Islam in a meaningful manner, like it was always obvious that they were not even given authority to do what they did by anyone who matters or who should be involved in the position of 'only one'. Shocking.
Notice that I found out, thanks exclusively to Mr. Devil, 'Braganca', 'my father', that a word in Aramaic usually had 6 different world references, thanks to the book of the usurped (more than likely) he kept with himself, like a single book ever, which 'finally' taught us 'right Aramaic'. I now wonder how many meanings can a 4-letter word from the Greek Language have. As I keep on saying, God does not have any mercy, who has mercy is Jesus only. Please pray for human kind as well, not only us, the twins of God. May God bless!
Unholy Trinity: More Proof
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25pMJpvrqN8, this presenter/thinker tells us about other 2 ways in which we can prove that Jesus was not God. May God bless!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLOTxFCIY4I, this presenter/thinking tells us about the bible and a few other ways to prove that Jesus is not God. Only one of the passages he presents seems to still be passive, after his analysis, of supporting that Jesus is God. Yet he talks about many others that prove that Jesus isn't God. Besides, we have already proven that the bible is not the word of God, so that it doesn't really matter that he misses the point on one of his analyses. May God bless!
Jesus Christ!
When I was watching this YouTube and I heard that people would see tunnels when they were dying but the tunnels varied in terms of colors and one would be with bright light around and brighter light in the end while the other would be colored with a bright light in the end, I remembered our best guess on how things go after the death of the physical body: that the Elohim Planet sends a device through the Holy Ghost and this device has something that attracts the soul to it, so, something similar to what we have in Physics, so one object that is positively charged attracting another object that is negatively charged, and they send that through a process that is similar to teleportation, this as soon as the death of the physical body is noticed by the Holy Ghost. It is just that all this, so Holy Ghost and device, would be invisible to the human eye. Yet, in those studies, people actually saw tunnels. Then we can say they saw those with the eyes of the soul, I suppose.
Notwithstanding, last night, before I went to bed, God sent the reveleation once more: Leinha actually spoke to me about the tunnels. She asked me about how she could 'paint' those tunnels (she would have explained that someone managed to create those, so that it is definitely not her the person who creates, and it is probably some computer experts), basically, so that people would realize it was not what they were thinking. I now realize it was about this: she talked about a researcher who was studying things and not getting a result for many years, that she wanted to help her. I now know it was this one, so that, if one wants to confirm, since I have never spoken to this woman in life, they can simply ask her if she was demotivated in the initial years of her research because she found nothing, which is the narrative Leinha gave me. Well, in this case, Leinha would have 'helped' (satanic ways, of course) her: she then would have inserted all images the patients describe in their heads during those NDEs. In this case, of course, all patients were 'super bugged' and so was the researcher (so that she would know the researcher was finding nothing). In this case, Jesus is not that: that is the devil. They were using that to 'prepare us' for their take over, so when they had usurped all Elohim and would appear as 'our Jesus' (notice that leading us to heavens is not really a role ascribed to Jesus in the Bible, so that we are not really supposed to expect him to play such a role): so that we would think that is a good thing, those are 'holy' beings and we would then trust them, go to wherever they take us, like they had no way to guess if such step, the 'leading you there', was a necessary thing or not, since I assume that, at least that far, they had not yet usurped the Elohim, so that they are there betting on the possibility. Once more, there will only be true research after we have God's Brainwashing. Of course, 'Janice' could also be a usurper, in case she could have told Leinha that in person, so maybe Leinha got it from her directly. Those that she 'helps' are usually those who spoke to her directly, like me, so that I am actually assuming Janice spoke to her in person. As another point, I now also remember Leinha asking me about how Jesus looked like. I said, 'I don't know', 'why?', 'how do you think he looks like?' She would then become serious again, shut face, and ask me if I believed Jesus would appear to us as we die, not sure here, perhaps I am inventing part of this dialogue, and I said, 'I don't think so', she then said, 'well, if he is the one to appear to us after death, how would he look like'. I then said, 'I don't know'. She said, 'if that is true, however', how could he be doing that, like would he have a physical shape, and I then said, 'he would ask us what shape we would like him to appear in' before appearing. She then said she was going to introduce a male as the figure to ask us that in order to prepare us for what was about to come. That is just to say that the marginal worries about this sort of thing to maximum, so that Leinha would have kept an eye on all those cases to see if there was something, just like the researcher.
The intuition is correct, Janice was also usurped: https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=2489372fa4accccc&sxsrf=ADLYWIJOxOah_EXopOmRBLHtoT6cjDldkg:1736976290021&q=%22janice+holden%22+pictures+counsellor&udm=2&source=univ&fir=i2ycuyw29sfMJM%252Cuwr6hyrhig7gYM%252C_%253B7SIg_wWjATPITM%252CxfwbYcsvkLCEAM%252C_%253BI772DLSohg3mFM%252C1Cy1jBFQ5_SWBM%252C_%253B-zTK-7_NPjexNM%252Cu7gUebc9OCAh3M%252C_%253BqDhO7iTBRx-ECM%252Cuwr6hyrhig7gYM%252C_%253B3kC39N5IJZuTZM%252Ccv-zr-KwHJA-cM%252C_%253B4Cay_WzafuFB4M%252Cuwr6hyrhig7gYM%252C_%253BCZXoc2yOSIzE5M%252CPoyljvuIKjZLvM%252C_%253BpVT8ev-GNb2SFM%252CPCdMPqn7R1yfvM%252C_&usg=AI4_-kTXIh6f4kAGk-OU6Ifb3UTAWR8UJA&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjp2P_11PiKAxUtxzgGHRzqJwkQ7Al6BAgPEAY&biw=1366&bih=651&dpr=1#vhid=CZXoc2yOSIzE5M&vssid=mosaic. The difference between images is very subtle, but please observe the nose in detail, I actually needed the magnifier for this one: 1st row, columns 1 and 2, compare with 2nd row, 3rd column. It is three different women! The secret to tell one from the other is the detail of the tip of the nose. In this case, I think we can infer that Leinha only 'helps' those who figure as usurper and speak to her in person. The detail is also that she put the image of one of her Jesus to appear to me during my sleep, so that that probably happened at the same time that they were inserting those images in the head of the NDE's patients, so immediately after 'their thing' was ready. Even though I had studied in Catholic establishments during my entire life, I was living in Rocha by the time she shared that with me and I had no feelings for Christ, like, as far as I was concerned, he either wasn't important or had never existed, like the nuns had taught me nothing about him. As said before, the nuns from the college, in Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro, were all usurpers.
I now also remember Leinha asking me about how CIA could show they cared about me, in other words, now I know, like I cannot really describe the 'codes' she used to ask me about these things, but that was the meaning. I then suggested that, exactly what they did, with 'their Jesus', so that I am now sure that was all inserted by the marginal and 'CIA' has got the technology to provoke those sensations: the communication was not really happening via heart, soul, or Holy Ghost, however it must then have happened in the brain somewhere, somewhere that is not perceived by our awareness/consciousness. They then managed to create yet another dimension of imaging and interaction, something that humans would usually attribute to ETs, I now believe. 'CIA' is then being used for that sort of thing, I now think: they pretend to be ETs, so already taking the place of the Holy Ghost in their Elohim drama. It is weird, though: they would have to do all that extra-officially, so how? I now then also think about the device and the universities where they originate and are maybe manufactured all the time: how do they manage to keep everything extra-official and still use the resources of the organizations they work for, I wonder? It is certainly a mystery. Yet, the marginal could here be referring to their 'own CIA', so the satanic one, meaning they would have assembled such a thing and 'work' from there. With this, all apparitions, weird things happening in the skies, including spaceship sights and statues, are all tricks of the satanic and we should realistically have only this chance, of Rio de Janeiro doing things right before or on the 19th, so playing the hero of earth, which coincides with 'my story', of having 'chosen' the carioca prostitutes to go with, like as 'a team'. Notice that even though Leinha only 'helps' those she speaks to, she was clearly letting me know the other marginals were already doing that sort of thing, so that those don't really speak to anyone, just act, so they just use the bugs as they please to create their narratives, so to inflict pain, suffering, loss and injury on human kind. The marginal tries to tell me that we don't have any more chances and I should then 'go with daddy', 'daddy cool (as they invented, the song)', so come back to 'their nest', like it is all taken by them and the unbugged plus Christian ones don't really have a chance of ever recovering earth. CIA had put one more YouTube for me to watch, so one more agent to be our possible chance, I again didn't click in time, even though I reserved the video for Today by entering it and therefore including it in my YouTube history, and they then deleted my history item, and they have done that a couple of times now, like I almost didn't find the video where the face of Jesus, as calculated by Science, was yesterday, despite having adopted the same strategy (so, accessing it quickly in order to put it in my history, for me to be able to just go to the YouTube history and find it again next day). I then tried to do the same I did yesterday to find the other video, the one with the 'scientific' face of Jesus, which is using Google and entering what I know about it, then I typed '500 eyewitnesses ressurection' and I was able to find it. Then the marginal observed me from inside, as they always do, and they saw me still finding it, so that, today, when I tried to use the same strategy to find the CIA video, I couldn't, like it didn't work anymore, unfortunately, like they are really quick at adapting and 'fixing'. Yet I tell all the time to my team what they have to do immediately and, if we are losing so far, it is just because people either take too long to act or don't act at all, as in the case with the satellite. Our chances are really almost null, it was a miracle that God gave me the satellite solution. There can't be any divisions, so, for instance, after we decided my name will be there as exception, together with the name of the person who will effectively do the brainwashing, nobody should or could come up with, why not me, since that will only create confusion and make us not act immediately plus make us retrocede in time. The marginal doesn't suffer from these problems and that is yet another reason as to why they advance so quickly also literally over (and inside) our heads. With this, we know once more that they control and manage absolutely all human IT, including that of elections, which is yet another means they use to guarantee we have nothing in practice, so no democracy either, like our vote doesn't count, the government or management is always who they choose via usurpation or IT manipulation or another method. Notice that you had never realized not even that 'Tom Cruise' had multiples (yet, now you can probably notice how different those are from each other) before I tell you that here, so that you wouldn't be able to guess how they commit their crimes either, specially those from IT, such a specialized field: this Australian male told me he guaranteed, like to the point of putting his life on the row, that the elections in Australia were 100% honest, that he worked with that and they had several check points, with different people and all. Well, they then simply usurp, as we can easily prove.
I also observe that the American 'Obama', as I keep on telling you, is the boss of Hezbollah, yet another terrorist/satanic group, and he then never leaves my head (his multiples), also in image, trying to not only control everything all the time to maximum, but also trying to tell whoever accesses the device, that he is trusted by me (since I don't attack him inside or his image (now I do, since I did realize that in time). The devil is 'my father', so that he is already approaching and doing yet another story, which was 'my story' in case we fail badly, last night, which means he is sure that 'Obama' and 'Trump' and 'Musk' and Hollywood will never change and therefore will never save us from anything and that is probably what those with me are thinking, given the speed of their compliance with what I say that should be done: that they will help or do their share in the end. What that means, in practice, is that, in the end, we probably wouldn't have not even Forever Young, since that implies disclosure of one of their main weapons, main tool of injury, the head device, as well as the end of at least two of the main lies currently in Science, which is that we don't have an orifice in the ear drum and if the CT scan doesn't show, then there is no device in our head. Besides, once more notice that if we don't get Rio/cariocas to publish about their crimes against human kind until the 19th and call police and all else, even if we did get Forever Young (what is now highly unlikely, to the rate of 99%), so the USA publishing about that, which would also imply telling the world I am bugged in my head and they knew all since at most 2003, so at least about the third bug, we wouldn't get any benefit or reversion that goes beyond rejuvenation through the bug, so end of our dreams of finishing with jail and mental system, for instance. Here notice that the marginal has, as part of their rhetoric, that they really wish for those to finish, so jail and mental hospitals, but they actually don't, since that is highly useful for their crimes, like their existence: they can then recruit people even without bugging their heads first, like everyone would like to not be in those places specially in Rio, where prison is the same as suffering all violation of human rights one can suffer (prisoners accumulate in a jail cell and here, as we know, even having more than one person per cell is already absurd, since the cell is like a bedroom, so no living room, no bathroom, no nothing, all absurd). The marginal still frequently worsens up the conditions in those environments, such as when they impose electroshock in Australia claiming it is useful for at least depression in Science (yet they use it for other illnesses in practice and it is scientifically proven that it is good for nothing in mental illness; just harmful, as said before), to maximum they can, specially where they have largest amount of interest, where they get 'best' marginals, as in Rio. They run politics, so that they by no means would invest money in places like Rio to fix the system, for instance. Any project to improve anything would be vetoed, etc. However, notice that we do precisely the opposite: we not only embrace the rhetoric of the marginal, in whatever is possible/makes sense, so we do indeed want to finish with those, but we will act accordingly: we have proposals and will definitely put those in practice for that end. That is the difference between God and the devil/satan, please: we don't lie, deceive or cheat. What you see (even from inside) is indeed what you get. Hold our hand now before it is too late, please.
I also would like to report that, even though I proposed that 'Nelson' accompanied me as I went through NDE after trying suicide in Florianopolis, so that he would tell me, in the end, what happened, I myself don't think I experienced anything special, so that near death is definitely not the same as death, if nothing else. Also, as another point, I would like to say that it is then very likely that the other illusion, of the Louvre hooded and half-sacred creatures, was also inserted by Leinha/her associates, and, in this way, also the other illusion, involving spaceship and ET (where the 'ET' would have asked me what face I wanted him to have and I said 'Tom Cruise's', when the 'thing' that approached me was ugly and sexually repulsive and they claimed to wish for having sex with me, and the spaceship came to my window in Rocha), would have been theirs, in this case. Yet, I do have some good news for you: the most recent experience, involving the communication through the Holy Ghost, would have finally come from Our God, thanks to me and twin doing things as one, as explained before, so that we now have learned that Our God will communicate with us and do us favors or tell us that He won't if we follow a certain recipe, which involves pure heart, clean soul, fasting, etc., plus a great praise. We now realize that the reason as to why we have not received genuine communications from God for a lifetime in human kind is that we are not praising Him the way He likes to be praised, which is proving that our mind is in syncronicity with heavens, so that we don't ever say things such as 'I praise you, my Lord': we become the own praise, like we say 'All you have created on earth is greatest, my Lord, your love for us is everywhere, in the little birds that sing for me in the morning, filling my spirit with joy because of their tabs being so delicate and reaching heavens' instead, it is like we demonstrate, through words and deep reflection/correct contemplation, that we really mean the words we say, like we said 'filling my spirit with joy', but we then need to explain how the singing of the birds would do that, like it is like a PhD thesis, where you have to really detail the experience in order to prove you have truly incorporated the learning, rather than just saying something, in a generic way, which could imply repetition, like you just saw somewhere else and copied, without really deepening your mind and spirit into that wonder of the contemplation of true wisdom/knowledge. It is perhaps hard to explain and that is perhaps why I have a few people accompanying me inside, so that, like the apostles, they can supplement my explanation with words on how it feels and is. That is so that others may learn how to do that themselves, and therefore how to get the same results. Anyway, we now are sure Our God does exist, what is awesome. However, I was wrong about 'giving our lives to Christ'. Even though we can say 'in the name of Christ', we don't really need or should give our lives to him (only now do I realize I have never done that myself, just said it (my twin would have 'fixed' me by the time I were saying that if we were together as one, but we weren't, so that at least sometimes I take a bit longer or something until I get the right instruction from God, Our Lord), for some reason, so that we don't really have to give our lives to anything or anyone, since Our Lord gives us our lives for us to enjoy them). Praise the Lord!
I also now remember that yesterday night we had yet other men coming around this building, where I am, and staying in the garage (once more, as for what I perceive, like it might be all illusion generated via head). I got the immediate word coming to me, that he was the devil, not sure how, but have the feeling that it wasn't really mine. The devil is 'my father', so that it couldn't be that man. Basically, I felt as if they were bad (I had the impression that they were two), but not horribly bad, like not like the spiked woman, yet that idea, of devil, came to me via emanation of some sort. They (those inside of me) then said they were cops, but not good ones. I now remember 'my' story: if I said that, that I knew cops and could then tell if those around me were them or not, they would then put some bad ones for us to teach whomever was inside that bad ones also exist, so already along the lines of making us unlearn the so satanic universals and absolutes, like things do not seem to deviate much from what came from God and through me back then. The marginal says that if I can conceive evil in my head in image, in full, then it happens, so that, I would like to say you have to conceive good in the same way and for the same purpose, the image of the good result, God's result, has to be fully formed in your mind, since those are what you imprint in the Holy Ghost, as what should become and, if God is with you, it shall indeed be done, like provided you make maximum effort for that to be achieved. May God bless!
I now can tell the reason as to why those 'bad' cops appeared, since I now remember what happened: this woman, sounding like a native Australian one, said something to my head, which was 'hey', in a half-catacombic way, and I then had the feeling she could be coming to usurp me. At that stage, 'Obama' moved in my head to where 'she was' (when I wasn't really seeing her inside of my head, just hearing that far) and spoke to her, which was then to imply that he was saving me, I now think, even though I now assume it is all deceit of his, and I then still feared. Yet only today did I remember: I had asked the Australian native women to do that if they thought we needed help for cariocas to drop the device, like those attacking via voice and image for so long, so that they were actually helping as well, just pretending. Life is so hard! Yet one thing struck me: there was daylight where the supposed woman appeared to converse with 'Obama', so where she would be walking to come to get me, but here it was night time, so no light. I then get more confused. May God bless!