Jesus and the Crucifixion

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/7DBSxRONcI0 tells us how things actually were: Jesus had his intestines out of his body when he died on the cross, meaning he resisted all the negro here says, still alive, and died only at the end of it. Since his intestines were out AS WELL, he obviously never resurrected (even though the marginal, after replacing him, comes up with wounds that were almost self-inflicted, as explained before, he obviously wouldn't put intestines out or anything like that. Jesus at most showed up in spirit therefore, once more, after death. Longinus was a good guy, good centurion, but he got replaced by the marginal before Jesus was taken, so that the marginal could maximize suffering and pain for Jesus. Even though the replacement of Longinus received such instructions, the marginal ended up pitying Jesus Christ when he saw his intestines out and the scenery the negro describes in this video, so that the marginal couldn't cope and replaced the replacement, then inventing that Longinus had visual impairment and got healed through the suffering/pain/mutilation of Jesus Christ for several reasons: one was to spread rhetoric in the direction of us acquiring a picture, in the Collective Unconscious (my definition), that, by hurting the Christians or Christ, we would get favors/good things/miracles happening, two was to spread rhetoric in the direction of us acquiring a picture, in the Collective Unconscious, that the satanic did something good to Our Jesus by hitting him (to legitimize their methods/approach to life, which is violence, brutality, maximum disloyalty, no mercy, and so on) and something way less worse than they had done (they used the history of Longinus to spread their version of the centurion, their slave, was actually a devotee, loved Christ like nobody else and so on) and three to keep on going with the myth they were there creating in order to pass way more satanic rhetoric. Also observe that the level of violence employed by the centurion was infinite and therefore frontally disagrees with what the supposed veteran said on his page. By the way, the satanic seem to have exterminated almost all veterans. I was watching the Anzac Parade yesterday and couldn't believe how meagre it was.

Notice here that, as the marginal did all things he did to Our Jesus, he concluded he was a crook and 'Mary' invented he was the savior to save herself from stonning, which was a version of the story that came to my mind when I was heavily satanized as well. In concluding such things, the marginal felt empathy and that is the only reason as to why he decided to replace Jesus and therefore invent some satanic utility for his figure. Our God is wise and great, so that He made good use of that, since it was only thanks to the marginal that the world got to know Jesus and Our God somehow and is therefore already inclined to join us. Our God has this thing: of writing straight through tortuous lines.

Upon asking a few things regarding human anatomy and situation of Christ in relation to the centurion to Co-pilot, also forensics, we are absolutely convinced that the marginal did not lie in what regards intestines being exposed: the satanic centurion (replacement of the good Christian Longinus, may Our God take good care of him now and forever) obviously would like to guarantee Christ's death, so that they could run their own program, of the satanic brotherhood, which would be that of confirming the prophecies they had invented, like Jesus couldn't keep on being alive after all that, he had to actually die, so that they could replace him. The own marginal says 'side' as the injured part (more than once, like when he is getting pierced and when the 'apostle' is checking, so that we are sure sure that is what they meant, the entire side), not lungs, torax, or stomach, so that it was the entire side and, to guarantee death, according to Co-pilot, that was best strategy, so that the marginal pierced on a single strike the entire side of Jesus, starting from below, where he was located, since things are similar to what we see in the movies. Just like the chin knock, the satanic make moves that remain unacknowledged by the human eye, so quick, so that the satanic centurion made a straight line from behind intestine and upwards, taking his entire side, what made the intestines show. To have the immediate flow of water and blood they describe, Co-pilot says it would have to be heart (blood) and pericardium (water), and it is possible to simply drag the spear in such a way starting from below the intestine. As another point, the satanic brotherhood wanted maximum humiliation of Our God's creatures, as always, if possible that they be proven to have a God that doesn't care enough or at all about them: that would be rhetoric to the own satanic brotherhood/sisterhood (then satan is right: powerful and caring, in the sense of protection and revenge, is only the devil). We observe that Christ never cried or yelled during the entire process of crucifixion (never yelled, ever), according to the own satanic brotherhood members: Our God takes away the pain from his body, process some described as being his soul being taken out, but it isn't. Our Lord Jesus also takes away the pain from my body during the entire process that I go through of crucififixion from inside over and over, like perhaps every single day in the last 3 years and 3 months plus, and I do not split from my soul: it is there all the time. We then believe human life is not a big deal for Our God and it became even less with the figure of Jesus and the process of incarnations. According to the satanic, Jesus would have asked Our God why he abandoned him, yet noticed that the word used was Abba, which is father (we now believe his adoptive father spoke Arabic instead and was never named Joseph, in the same way his mother was never named Mary. They should have Arabic names instead), therefore 'Joseph', since we never see his figure mentioned during the crucifixion, only the female figures instead and Jesus was then missing him (this is all told by the satanic, so that we cannot really testify on that being true). The marginal would have frugal contact with the history/life of Jesus, things changing a bit since 1880s because of the 666, like they can now accompany all the process of a human life, if wanting, through their atrocities but, before the 666, they had to guess most of it, specially in what comes to people like Jesus/true Christians, since they, first of all, would have some respect, and would naturally keep distance, and second, in the case of Jesus, some protection from the Highest, so that those elements would not be close to him in life. They could not spot Jesus' adoptive father anywhere around Jesus after he starts mentoring/guiding humans, as Co-pilot says, and their assumption, which is obviously Co-pilot's, is then that 'Joseph' died before he started doing that (again, all these reports cannot really be believed, since it is all coming from the satanic brotherhood). It is all very unfortunate, that the only true source of information we are left with, in such a world, before we start executing Our Salvation Plan, is the own marginal. If Our Jesus really worked with wood together with his adoptive father, then he must have been very fond of him, which does make it possible that Our Jesus would call for him at the cross, yet we really cannot trust the reports we have got so far, as said.

Here we also prove that the marginal needed to change rhetoric/narrative: from what actually happened and was seen by the eyes of the satanic centurion to the story they tell, which is that the centurion's eyes were healed, like Jesus still said, 'Thank You', to him after being pierced, or worse, Our God did. The intestines were not showing either, according to their narrative, so that the blow was 'just to check things' and the centurion was obliged to do 'at least that' by his commander, like the 'war' 'veteran' describes in his paper (https://jmvh.org/article/saint-longinus-at-the-cross-a-veterans-story/), which we mentioned here somewhere, and so on. We learned, long time ago, that the marginal replaces usurpers with new usurpers each time he changes narrative, so that this also corroborates the version of the story we told here and perhaps, finally, the marginal never really had any good intention when replacing the replacement. May Our God bless those who do what we ask immediately.