Saturday, 3 May 2025
satanic bible: The Actual Truth
We concluded that the man who 'wrote' the satanic bible (we now know almost all of it is the stolen research from an Egyptian woman, therefore white) never gave it to the cannibals who later on took it from the slave to whom he gave it. We concluded that he never spoke to the cannibals who lived next door perhaps for knowing better, like being used to that sort of culture, people and place and knowing those were, for sure, cannibals. He then gave it to the slave he liked the most or the slave he thought was most inerested in reading, growing in intelligence or culture. The cannibal then took it from the slave because they have respect for nothing and nobody, like the undomesticated beast. We reached this conclusion for analyzing the life of the 'writer' of the satanic bible: all he wanted was coming back to Egypt after he saw himself obliged to join his parents in killing the enemy of the father. As he came back, he had done all he needed and wanted to do from the book he himself 'wrote', so that he could already get rid of it. Not seeing any sense in giving the book to a library because it contained a philosophy that is illegal everywhere on earth, even in Egypt from back then, he decided to give it to someone who understands the necessity of that book never coming to people outside of a reduced circle. Perhaps he gave it to the slave with whom he had sexual intimacy, perhaps that was only one. He is obviously homosexual and might have observed the guys next door to him in Nubia, those who were owners of slave, doing anything he wanted with those negros, including sex and that might even have been why he wanted to have slaves himself. The story is changed into what we told because, once more, the satanic wants to pass rhetoric: everyone calculates their moves, nothing is what seems, nobody is spontaneous and everyone manipulates others. Also what you do with those next to you is programming their lives, interfering with their destiny, without them realizing it. They also want to pass rhetoric in the direction of no manager/power person being able to act in a generous manner toward anyone under them, like that we should always be suspicious when they at most 'seem' to gift us with something, like there would be ulterior motives, that is not sincere. In this way, that neighbor is a cannibal and gets another guy 'just like him' to join him as they move to Arabia. That is when the brotherhood is founded and they then shape things according to their own thinking. In this case, the supposed neighbor who 'accidentally' spotted the book being given to the slave, is someone like the negros we see today: opportunists, like the negro/marginal/satanic never changed. In this case, he may as well never have been a neighbor and be like those negros on the top of the hills in Rio in the beginning of the satanic bringing them from Africa and putting them there, just observing everyone all the time until they find what they call 'soft' target. This type of 'vagrant' from Egypt was around the man's house and had been there observing him and the slaves for a while, since they arrived, just because the ID he was usurping was that of a foreigner and the negro satanic man's eye still nowadays locks on the foreigners before they lock on anyone else, like they are the most detached, the most likely not to be missed and also the most likely not to be remembered or identified by the locals. He then did not collect the book from the hands of the slave immediately: instead, he observed the slave walk toward his house in the back of the owner's property or wherever it was, waited for the night and violated the place to steal the book. Perhaps he killed the slave for him not to complain to the owner and then disappeared with his body. Yet we believe he just stole the book. The slave would not complain because he probably thought the only person who could have done that was the own owner. Because who stole it is a cannibal, it could even be his habit stay around properties with lots of slaves in order to kill and eat them once in a while, like that was his 'garden'. Because he already did that and the owners in Egypt probably did not count their slaves therefore, must have had many each, it was easy for him. The book was there and he then decided to eat precisely that one that time. We then believe the 2 of them, cannibals, adapted the book to their style of living, perhaps then creating the theory on heavens and hell and the entire plot to take over the Elohim or be the sole survivors, when Our God, as imagined by them, second theory, Ethyopian bible, so an exact copy of themselves, would approach them and wish for friendship because they would finally be rid of sin, so not tempted by any flesh, therefore not practicing cannibalism anymore, and not tempted by any being capable of sex with humans, therefore not having erections anymore, also not tempted by any sort of property, since they now live underground in Easter Islands, in holes, or have all the same things, perhaps have nothing, yet enjoy access to maximum human wisdom via computers or something. Not sure. Please draw your theories and contribute. By adding their bits to the satanic bible, they learned that they could always do that, so find a book of someone else and add their bits to it, then using it as if it were theirs, written by them. That is why they are able to find our book, containing the actual biographies of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, book of the Christians, written by the Phoenicians, the only Our God's people on earth back then, and add their bits, this time substantial bits, enormous. They got into the habit and then obviously included that as a practice of the satanic brotherhood. We concluded the owner never reported losing his slave, even though he noticed he disappeared next day after receiving his gift, because he thought the slave did exactly what he expected, which was what he did himself: he used the book to brainwash himself with the 'right' thinking, so to align his spirit with hell, and perpetrate after that, so that he could get rid of being a slave and acquire property and whatever else. In this case, the cannibal took the slave or ate him there and then took the book. As we guessed this, the satanic let us have a memory glimpse and there 'Braganca'/the devil said exactly that (the cannibal 'fishing' from among the slaves, those with lots of them, observing the slave from a distance, actually behind the property, on a mount, if I remember well. He waited for the night and then visited the slave's house, where he probably lived on his own. I see an image in my head as if I think or speak about it, but only after I guessed, and that seems to be of a small house at the front of the property, on a corner, left from those walking from the entrance of the house of the 'writer' toward his house. In my head, I see a rectangular front yard and his house to the left corner/vertex, a wall around it and on the line of the rectangle. We don't know if that is a depiction of the reality back then, in terms of physicality, but it certainly doesn't look possible, since I see a modern house for the writer and a wall that seems to be made of concrete, but the material they used in Egypt back then must have been different. Perhaps it is just an idea of location in the property and entrance door of the writer plus entrance door of the slave. We conclude the 'writer' did intend to free the slave through his book. May Our God bless who does what we ask immediately.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment