Longinas: The Roman Centurion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RB98-W1PuU brings the story of 'Saint' Longinas. It is all so absurd that, if nobody had told me it were possible, I wouldn't really believe. Basically, the satanic invented that the centurion who brutally attacked the side of Jesus when he was on the cross, making Jesus' body expel blood and water, got blessed by Jesus, like the message is basically 'attack the holy figure to get their favors'. Obviously not! That absolutely never happened. God does not have any mercy: only Jesus does. The satanic then implies that one can steal God's favors somehow, first of all, so not be a believer or a follower and still get His favors, not have minimum respect for not even the body of the holy figure and still get miracles to their side and physical violence against the holy ones is a means to get blessings. The complete inversion of all: only the satanic could do things like this, quite sincerely. Here, once more, we obviously don't have any reliable records of the history of this man on earth, Longinas, and I find it hard to believe even that one can prove that he was ever alive, like we don't even have a surname. The marginal does that repeatedly: no first name, if first name no surname, no location, no date, no time and so on, yet narratives in which we are supposed to believe as if they were real-life stories. 'My' 'grandmother', 'Maria Ribeiro Ricci', used to recite a line each time she lost something: 'Sao Longuinho' something. I now forgot her line. Basically, this 'saint' would be the one for lost items. We have already seen that saints is a wrong thing, then now I believe this 'Sao Longuinho' translates into 'Saint Longinas' and therefore you can only be joking, like this can only serve as more support to the idea that saints should all have their kingdom attacked and finished, basically.

I am thinking that if one accepts this narrative as factual, then one can easily extend the reasoning involved and therefore all atrocities against the Christians, or the holiest figures around, perpetrated by the marginal are made acceptable and still very logically justified: they could then enjoy our blessings. Oh, God!

Herman The Recluse: Czech Republic Icon, Religion (The Devil's Bible Writer)

We hear about this figure when watching the YouTube video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0djS7abKM. He is then told to have been a Benedictian Monk who had been condemned to be bricked alive and starved to death (is this really something that can be told in books and not lead to the end of the Catholic Church, I wonder), yet nobody is able to tell what sin he committed, not even that. This man would then have proposed a deal to the abbot of the monastery: that he gave him one day for him to write a book containing all knowledge available in human kind in exchange for saving his life. Unable to write everything in time, he appeals to the devil and the devil then helps him write the Codex Gigas, a 75 Kg tome. The problems with this are several: Wikipedia has a different report and says that the deal was 1 year instead of 1 day and that is way more reasonable and a person could definitely have the time to write this tome in one year. All the knowledge of human kind resumed to only a few areas of knowledge, as we see mentioned in the own video, so that it was, by no means, all knowledge available. Besides, the contents of the book are clearly plagiarism, as we can read from Co-pilot: "The "Devil's Bible," also known as the Codex Gigas, is a large medieval manuscript created around the early 13th century. It contains a variety of texts, including:

The Complete Latin Bible: Both the Old and New Testaments in the Vulgate version.

Works of Flavius Josephus: "Antiquities of the Jews" and "The Jewish War".

Isidore of Seville's Encyclopedia: "Etymologiae".

Chronicle of Cosmas of Prague: "Chronica Boemorum".

Medical Texts: An early version of the "Ars medicinae" compilation of treatises, and two books by Constantine the African.

Other Texts: Various shorter texts on topics such as penitence and exorcism.

The Codex Gigas is also famous for its full-page portrait of the Devil, which is where it gets its nickname. Despite its ominous name, the manuscript is a remarkable piece of medieval literature and art."

The portrait of the devil is absolutely ridiculous, like a cartoon sort of thing.

I am sure, after examining the information available to us, that this book was no miracle, was written in one year (consisted of simply copying the work of others!), and does not contain the full knowledge of human kind from that time, like there are many things that were known at that time that are not present, such as Engineering and Architeture.

In this case, the monk got revolted with his monastery and called the abbot devil, since he had a deal with him instead. There is nothing that he has written in the devil's bible that implies he got it through a deal with the devil and he was a benedictian monk, so that this is like 99.9% unlikely. To become this type of monkey, according to Co-pilot, he would have studied at least 5 full years the liturgy of the Catholic Church, which means heaviest brainwashing as possible against the devil. It is realistically impossible that this man would have said he got the book through the devil or any agreement with it. Saying that is again satanism: that is a satanic narrative of the life of this man, for God's sake. We don't say such a thing about people unless we are absolutely sure, specially about people who are supposed to be those who least sin on earth. No, please, let's fix this one more biography. The video further states that it was weird that the book was written on vellum, which is animal skin. Yet, I asked Co-pilot and it told me that that was common practice back then, so that there is nothing special about that either. The video then says that the book would take a normal person 20 to 30 years to write, yet, in the same way we have reports on it taking 1 day, we have reports on it taking 1 year, so that we may as well say anyone could have said 20 years and it would be all the same, quite sincerely, like we don't have anything proving that the book started being written at a certain date and had its last page written at another, so that it is all guesses. The presenter states that if Herman had taken 30 years to write the book then the book would present change of calygraphy style somewhere but it doesn't. Co-pilot helps with this one: "(I asked if there is any book written by human hands during a period of more than ten years that presented no change in size or shape of letter) One example is the Book of Kells, an illuminated manuscript Gospel book in Latin, containing the four Gospels of the New Testament. It was created around 800 AD and is known for its intricate and consistent calligraphy, although it was likely produced by multiple scribes over several years." Basically, we get to know that the writing was 'the same' even though the scribes were different, so that there the argument is stopped. The presenter also talks about ermine loincloth having been used to cover the genitalia of Herman's drawing of the devil as being something special, as if he revered the devil since the royals were told to dress in such fabric. Well, I consulted Co-pilot and found out that the ecclesiastic garnments were made of those when the priests had highest ranks. In this case, he was probably calling the abbot a devil if the fabric of the nappies of the devil are supposed to mean something. I observe however that my first impression was that of a ridiculous figure, so that I see absolutely no respect for the devil whatsoever and, if for the presenter, that looks like a royal attire, to me it looks like nappies, calling the devil a retarded person, which I do think is adequate, a person who did not grow up. The presenter also talks about 10 missing pages of the book possibly containing he devil's prayer and, because of that, having been removed: Mary Madaglene's book had 9 pages missing and nobody ever said that about hers. Mark's gospel is missing entirely and again nothing like that was invented, so that there is no reason for such a belief. As a last point, though, worth adding, his book has nothing to praise the devil or his creations or rhetoric, so that we should definitely change its name, from devil's bible to Herman's Book or something. May God bless!

Christoph Heizmann: Austrian Icon, Painter

This YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0djS7abKM, says this man signed actual paper contracts with the devil and even though he met the devil and the image of the devil was human, the pact he then acquired with him, of being given talent and fame for his paintings for 9 years, returned nothing in practice to him, like he still had the same mediocre performance during those 9 years. The devil would have said he would come after his soul after 9 years and Christoph started having convulsions exactly 9 years after the contract was made. He signed two contracts: one by ink and another by blood. Freud would have examined him and determined he had a mental problem instead of a genuine experience with the beyond. It seems unreasonable that an entity that does not belong to this world would ask for contracts that belong to it. To make it worse, we never see the devil signing those in any of the reports on paper contracts with him, but, if he demands such, it would be expected that he would also sign them, isn't it? Well, once more, the devil doesn't wait: he puts the soul immediately in hell. I don't believe on a single apparition of a single 'saint': first of all, saints are not creatures of God. They are creatures of the Catholic Church. As such, they don't have such power. Notice here that, if such a thing existed, and therefore if the Catholic church ever represented God on earth (since that is definitely their claim and attitude), such a thing would always have existed. Yet, as far as we know, apparitions of saints 'exotically' coincide with the start of existence of the Catholic Church (it is like this: you only learn if you are wise. On AD 30-33, according to Co-pilot, the (Roman: therefore that one, of Joseph of Arimathea) Catholic Church starts. On AD 40, the first ever recorded apparition of a saint is recorded. God!!!). It also looks like one more flavor of the 'same': putting together a satanic book and imposing it to the Christian churches as the only truth. In this case, Christoph never actually saw the saint in question. Everyone else who had a pact with the devil claims to have received what they asked in return, so that this is also not matching history of contact with the devil that we know about. That is then, all together, perhaps plus some extra, what led 'Freud' to conclude it was all mental, rather than actual. We are with 'Freud' on this one too. I am not so sure about how those people would have claimed to have seen things they have not seen when they were not mentally ill. Notwithstanding, nowadays we know what the satanic did in those few cases we here studied (in these Blogger blogs), so that we imagine similar things took place: they could have done voice to skull on the people who hallucinated, those people could have simply lied to help the Catholic Church at their own will, it could be that the Catholics always kept secrecy of the important data (who saw, when, where, what time, full name and contact details of those who saw, so that we can speak to them directly) and so on. May God bless!

Francesco Bartos: Italian Icon, Arts (Sculptor)

This man got caught by Inquisition, as https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0djS7abKM shows: the reason would be that nobody, at that time, believed he himself had shaped marble in such a delicate and complex way. Inquisition accused him of collaborating with the devil. He had to then prove that it wasn't by shaping marble in front of the court staff. His work is satanic: one that is a statue and any statue is satanic, two that people are naked in those and one of them seems to even contain a skull on top of a baby sort of flying on the top of a tree and very distant from its possible carers. It is said that, back then, they believed demons could make objects appear from nowhere, similar to magicians. I wouldn't say his work is admirable to me because I don't like statues or naked people that be not my husband and at most me, even so, without an audience. In this case, it may as well have been made by the devil, just that it would be the 'devil in him'. He then would have achieved the spiritual entitlement to those skills, when Jesus, who is the manager of the life in-between earth and heavens, would have awarded those to him according to his choice, so following a model that is similar to the one we will have after Marcia Hope starts in what regards the bug and the centrals. Yet, he would have chosen, using God's free choice, to apply those skills to satanic activities. That should mean he chose the devil as his Lord, since whoever is not with Our God is with the devil, but there is a chance he never learned the word, like never attended a Christian church or read what we are now calling satanic bible but, so far, is known as the Christian bible. In this way, he could not know that those things were wrong, when God may forgive and still accept him in heavens. May God bless!

John Lennon: English Icon, Music

They say, on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0djS7abKM, that John Lennon would have gone to a bridge at midnight because there was a story going around saying that whoever went to that bridge at midnight would see the devil. That he formed his band in 1960 and only succeeded in creating the 'wow' effect on the audience after he made such a deal. What we found out, and publish here, is that he got usurped. We don't know when exactly that happened, since the information we have access to at the moment is very limited. I would think that that is an absurd lie, so that they marginal/satanic create that story to try to defend that the usurper is better than the original. I am sure God would only allow the original Lennon to go like that if he were ready for ascension, like the time of learning with that body and ID was over for him for some reason, and this reason was probably that he planned, with his heavenly tutor, in the spiritual realm, spending that limited amount of time in that shape and identity before incarnating. The need for the ID to keep on going has probably to do with the dreams or requests of his parents to God, like perhaps they wanted a son that shone highest, was recognized by his art and marked history or something. The usurper probably stole his essence via bug, so that the talent that made the usurpers ascend probably came from the originals. That is probably the place where the first usurpation took place, like where they killed the original Lennon. To make him go there, they would have bugged him first to then brainwash. That was to justify the satanic narrative they would later on impose to his history on earth. We observe that the narrator never mentions statements of the own Lennon that prove that to us, so that that would have been known by someone, who, we conclude, was obviously the marginal, so that whoever got this token of information, and we believe that is the presenter of the video, got it from the marginal. Leinha actually talked to me about this bridge thing, I now remember, so that she can help us clear the history of Lennon (provided that, at that stage, she is alive and well, like the same version of Leinha as well, so the same multiple) after God's Brainwashing is on. The presenter ads that the devil would come back after 20 years to collect his soul. Here we observe that the devil 'cashes' immediately, not after 20 years or the enjoyment, like the soul goes to hell immediately and lives there permanently too, probably being destroyed after enough punishment has been applied, just like the satanic bible says. Yet, satan, when allowing the usurpation to happen, or making it possible, could easily have told the usurper that they would only have 20 years of usurpation of that particular ID, like they may remain alive and usurp yet another or they may be killed, in there copying the process of after-death of God, like making the equivalent happen in the human life realm, this given that they split life in 5 blocks of 20 years, as said before. The symbology involved is that they would have to 'return' the essence of that ID to the devil, that is, they will have to use another or their own, so the mechanical or satanic soul. That 'Lennon' would have said that they were bigger than Jesus: no, obviously not, who said that was the usurper in case that was indeed said by 'Lennon'. They say a certain man, who appeared to be connected to satanism, would have appeared on the cover of one of the Beatles' albuns. That was obviously the touch of the usurpers, once more, not of the original 'Lennon'. The same with the cover where babies appear beheaded and bleeding and stuff: the marginal then had the intentions of trivializing such crimes through brainwashing. The same with the story of saying he was possessed when speaking to photographers: usurpers' thing to spread and trivialize satanism, so now being possessed would allow a person to perform activities that are considered normal (obviously not possible). Cases of possession are studied by the Catholic Church for ages and kept as secret, no images taken, by the satanic, who obviously have an interest of not showing what actual possession looks like. Even so, they let some images available online of pretty bad cases, which I am sure you can see if you try. Yet, he was probably referring to the device in his head, thinking about it, so maybe the marginal didn't like that particular usurper very much and imposed a little martyrdom to him each time he was being photographed, quite possible. If the pictures showed 'Lennon' with looks of possessed or demoniac, then that was the reason: to brainwash us, trivialize satanism again, associate good things, such as good sounds and nice looks, to evil stuff. I actually just remembered Leinha again: she managed this guy's head. She told me the reason they did that: it is apparently that they didn't like his ways a lot, like maybe they feared he would get too proud of his own image or maybe he enjoyed having his pictures taken too much or something. I now think she was probably having sex with him, that particular usurper and she then handled him that way or something. 'Imagine there is no heaven' 'or hell below us' is something they also mention as satanic: indeed, it seems that, so far, we need God to punish the really evil people, like human kind, so far, is powerless to manage those adequately, but there is very little in the satanic bible about heavens and hell. The message of the lyrics is mostly positive even though it has this line: 'a brotherhood of men'. That means he also ignores women, as all satanists, like they are not someone, otherwise they would have said 'a siblinghood of humans or something. 'Nelson' has that plan of having, in the end, only men, as said before, so that is compatible and indeed brainwash us with that being a good thing, therefore it makes men more likely to join their system. At the same time, satanic is any message that makes us be deceived and there is certainly heavens and hell, even though, at the moment, I am unable to provide a full account on those that be 100% accurate. We need Our Plan coming to life to be able to do better and that includes the twins of God as one in flesh. the video mentions Mark David Chapman, assassin of 'Lennon'. This guy is innocent, since he was used by Leinha to kill him, nothing else: he is obviously bugged. He is one of the many names in human history that need to have their history recovered by us during the execution of Our Plan and onwards. It looks like 'the devil' killed the usurper 20 years later in this case, so no chance for a new usurpation. May God bless!

Jonathan Moulton: American Icon, Army General

Defamation is everywhere, since the world is ran by the satanic for ages, as said many times now: this man was a Brigadier General, which is a bit lower than a General, still part of the 5 top positions of the army, yet the video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZQrw3caM3w, makes us think this man was a soldier instead. They then talk about unexplainable wealth, yet a General should receive a reasonable pay, just like when 'Braganca' became a General in Brazil. I observed that from close, so that I really know: the armed forces salaries are no way spectacular and the soldiers barely have what to eat, like me when enjoying the IPRS from Australia in 2001, so with about 10k per year, which means not enough for a person to live on their own in a place satisfying Gropious' Laws, which should be the basic need of a researcher. I would bet he simply had gotten the minimum thing, like I don't see them referring not even to cars, so imagine airplanes and things like that. In this video, which is supposedly all evidence they could find on the man being a satanic person, only a house is mentioned as his property, so they don't even refer to size of land, which should mean wealth. Basic needs, like all other officers of the army, things getting a bit better when they get to Colonel or something. The own satanic, in this video, say he was a 'legendary civil war hero', so how can a man be such and still be demoniac, we wonder, and then the things that came to mind is that perhaps the people he defended were not Christians but we then know he was American and the civil war would then have been a war inside of America but the detail that is not told in the video and appears in Wikipedia is that that was the independence war of America, against the British, therefore they were defending freedom of God's chosen people from oppressive forces and that was then Christian against Christian, in principle, but Our God is against domination by force of other Christians, only accepting that in what regards people of other beliefs, so that the English were not really being Christians there, just claiming to be, and therefore the applauded participation of this man in the war was not a satanic thing. The video says he was despised by the 'poor puritan population' of where he lived, despite his war glories. The fact that they say 'puritan' implies that the General would have sinned or would have been impure. Yet, the only sin they seem to mention would be that of 'flaunting his wealth over their faces'. His wealth, once more, is a house, if we understand well. We observe the person presenting never said money. That is then absurd claim, which is not seen in Wikipedia, despite it being a satanic vehicle and it doing wrong lots of times. They then say he was satanic because he had too much money, that being the first cause of the claim. We have then canceled this one. The second cause would be that he married another woman too quickly after his wife passed away, yet on Wikipedia we see that that he married the other one one year after the wife's death. One year is not too quickly: too quickly would have been next day or month or semester or something. Yet, they are right: the husband, if the marriage is Christian, should remain single after the wife dies. At the same time, a match made in heavens would usually mean the two die together or close to each other in time. It is not easy to find our heavenly match in this world and most men from the military would be brainwashed with marrying the first woman that appears in their lives, a practical thing: men need to solve that problem to be allowed to have the etereal wisdom, the word of God on earth, and so on. The military then decides for pretending that they solved that problem in the same way they brainwash them with things such as that your Country/nation/people are worth your life, like all military does that to them, regardless of how unChristian the people or nation is. If men are not brainwashed, they will obviously desert at a certain stage of the thing, like they won't fight the entire battle or fight. It is their soul versus brainwashing, as it is with me and the highly satanized world we live in: as said before, it is truly difficult even proving to yourself that you have been brainwashed. He then obviously did not have his heavenly match with him and therefore it was easier for him to marry another woman than it would be for most people in the town he lived. Again, no satanism or deal with the devil. We observe that, if someone has such, people get to be told by them they do at a certain stage, since satan wishes for advertising that whenever the gain could come across as something good and that obviously depends on the others praising whatever they do as if it were admirable. May God bless!

Holy Musical Instrument: Is that Possible?

So, we heard the YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZQrw3caM3w, and couldn't believe what they said also about violins: that they are the devil's instrument. First of all, any musical instrument, therefore any work of art that allows for sound to come out of it, could be used to praise our Lord and He could enjoy its sounds. A violin, in particular, has one of the most beautiful sounds we find, like 'Andre Rieu' is extremely popular and people seem to love his sound, some Christians included among those. There is obviously not such a thing as the devil's musical instrument. The devil should not like music: he should like at most noise, so maybe things such as punk or hardcore and, even so, probably not that he will like listening to those himself, he just likes the effect of those. Satan, however, who works on the demoniac system, does use noise as a tool to satanize people. The noiser a melody is, the more likely it is to deprive us from our natural judgement, therefore the more it will induce us to commit crime, therefore to sin in highest degree. All violin music I've heard has got harmony, like it is always all very interesting, if not pleasant. No way this is or was ever true then. There should be no such a thing as a demoniac or devil's thing, like an object charged with demoniac spiritual energy: the devil builds nothing. He just destroys everything and everyone. Objects were build by people and, as 'my' Seicho speaker taught, they contain the love of the person for human kind (I am changing the teaching a little bit): everything human kind builds should contain the love of the builder for us all, since, even when it does not make immediate sense to us, say someone put a bunch of sticks together and wrapped them on a lace and gave that to us, it still means the soul of those building it, so that those sticks would still mean something, even if it is a message of the type 'I am in spiritual trouble', and communication is loving others, is trying to connect to them somehow. We have to then investigate the reasons for such a popular belief. Co-pilot then helps us again: "(I asked: who invented that violin is the devil's instrument and why?)The idea that the violin is the devil's instrument has evolved over centuries and doesn't have a single inventor. The association can be traced back to several factors:

Ancient Greek Beliefs: Musical instruments were often linked to deities and ethical attributes. Aristotle, for instance, criticized the aulos (a wind instrument) for being too exciting.

Renaissance Period: During this time, dance and music were often associated with sinful behavior. The devil was blamed for the existence of dance, and by extension, the instruments that accompanied it, including the violin.

Niccolò Paganini: The legendary violinist Niccolò Paganini (1782-1840) was rumored to have made a pact with the devil due to his extraordinary talent. His striking appearance and virtuosity fueled these rumors.

Cultural Myths: Various cultural myths and artistic depictions have contributed to this association. For example, paintings like Pieter Brueghel's "The Triumph of Death" and Hendrik Goltzius's "Couple Playing, with Death Behind" depict the devil playing a violin-like instrument.

The combination of these factors has cemented the violin's reputation as the devil's instrument in popular culture." We here read that there was never a statement coming from the devil saying the violin belonged to him and, as with God, why would we care otherwise? A striking appearance and virtuosity is what would have 'reinforced' that: I am sorry, but that would also come from God, perhaps the description here is a bit satanized, so say glowing appearance instead. As for the art pieces, why should we allow those to exist or be around? Painting of the devil? God really does not like this sort of thing: only one God and that is Him. No art, at most books with illustrations or something, so that we see the devil's face, yet the devil has incarnated in the shape of 'my' 'father', therefore we know his shape and it has nothing to do with those. Hopefully he will still be alive and well when we get to Marcia Hope's time, so that we can interview him, since the satellite thing is already going to be on, and he is then going to tell us all and in those things we will be able to believe, at such time.

We tend to associate harps with God, though, like the praise from Psalms/bible appears associated with those. Would it then be the case that all praise should be done with the aid of harps if we sing it? Probably not. I am sure God prefers no instrument because those may come on the way to sincerity and grandiosity of the praise. A person who is creating the song as it goes or playing an instrument should not be able to think deeply about the words they are saying, yet that is a necessity for a good praise, as we saw (meaning those in my head) recently. We really need to feel the things we say, to the level of that 'knowing' of 'Jung' for it to be something Our God appreciates.

It also seems to be the case that music is for our entertainment, a gift from Our God, and the way we please Him is with actions, sacrifices and compliance instead. It seems that when the Ancient people, from Psalms, classified a praise as good, that was something to do with the music as well and their personal taste, therefore the person who is playing is then not worrying only about God, but also about the crowd that watches, what destroys the purity of the act of praise, like it is now polluted by the intentions of pleasing humans but, as 'Mother Theresa' said, it should be about us and God only.

Now, we do notice the person the YouTube refers to, in what regards reinforcement of the satanic theory, that the violin belongs to the devil, is a bit ugly, like he looks like 'Murillo', so has that enormous chin and so on, which could mean deformity or satanic looks (yet, I have never seen satan, so how can I tell if he is ugly or beautiful? At most I think black 'Nelson' is satan and he is not that ugly), yet he seems clean and tidy, even slim, and obesity does reinforce uglyness plus is satanic, since it means you overeat and do not exercise, therefore you do not take care of the house of your soul. Well, the man, according to the picture they present, is slim, actually very slim, clean and tidy in all his looks and at most he wears always black, as the presenter says, but then don't priests and Orthodox Jews also do that? We are used to be told they are holiest instead, so that black doesn't seem to mean satanic, like it is just one more color and it usually makes us become more elegant in presentation than the white color, usually associated with angels. Yet, black does close things and makes us less likely to receive good energy from the person, like it seems to block the transmission of energy from one being to another somehow and, indeed, they say the color black, in science, blocks the sun, so the light, which is usually associated with God. We also chose to dress black in funerals and we chose to say funerals are a reason for mourning instead of joy, so that it does not really make sense associating the same color to God's people. Then, once more, we have proven here that priests and Jews CANNOT be God's people and that may then match their choice of colors, finally, since God writes straight through tortuous lines. As another point, by giving him the gift of good music, God is making people stop noticing his ugly features, so say his chin, and connect to him via the sound of his soul instead and therefore he is being more blessed by God for some reason. The reason shouldn't ever be that he is demoniac, therefore we may cross that one out, please. I also observe that they have another picture of his in the beginning of the report and that one brings him wearing some white at the top, so that the claim is not even true, that he was always wearing black. The story involving the homicide is obviously not true, since we cannot even imagine how one can use intestines as strings of violin, please. Also, no human being should have the power to steal our souls: at most the devil, so the satanic system, these devices and so on. Now, it may be true that he was womanizing and drinking alcohol in excess, in case Our God could withdraw part or all of his blessing. Since they say he even played better or something, then he wasn't really womanizing or doing anything evil from that alcohol drinking habit. They invented all this, in the same way they invented the homicide. It is all satanic narrative. Then it is said that he died of cancer and refused the priest by the time of death. It might be that God punished him through the painful disease in that case, so while alive, and the priests are satanic creatures, so that refusing them should have no connection to being demoniac, like perhaps he could see beyond the established rules and that could imply even the opposite. They say his body was refused by the church and went around for a long time until 'the pope' forgave 'him'. Oh, God, what a long satanic string: a body contains no soul and therefore it makes no sense bothering about it but we decided, for hygiene and mourning purposes, to keep it intact and buried somewhere. The pope is an authority established by humans, not by God, and therefore he never had the rights to forgive the sins of anyone on earth: that is obviously only with the Lord and it is highest blasphemy to imagine they someday had this power. Shocking that these things would mean, so far, that this man was demoniac instead of most blessed. Notice, though, that you cannot get confused: the devil has been giving the essence of the original person to the usurper in some cases and that is then when God most worries about His kids, since he is protecting their history on earth in what regards at least a few things that mattered the most for us, humans, he is again using that usurper so that they still glorify the name/id of His creature, despite them being dead. We then imagine the IDs the devil preserves are those of the most gifted, most blessed by God, and those could then have their souls collected by God at that time, which was the time God decided meant completion of their cycle of evolution, more than likely, when they should then join Him and His wife in the Elohim Planet or paradise. May God bless!