Ancient Greek Beliefs: Musical instruments were often linked to deities and ethical attributes. Aristotle, for instance, criticized the aulos (a wind instrument) for being too exciting.
Renaissance Period: During this time, dance and music were often associated with sinful behavior. The devil was blamed for the existence of dance, and by extension, the instruments that accompanied it, including the violin.
Niccolò Paganini: The legendary violinist Niccolò Paganini (1782-1840) was rumored to have made a pact with the devil due to his extraordinary talent. His striking appearance and virtuosity fueled these rumors.
Cultural Myths: Various cultural myths and artistic depictions have contributed to this association. For example, paintings like Pieter Brueghel's "The Triumph of Death" and Hendrik Goltzius's "Couple Playing, with Death Behind" depict the devil playing a violin-like instrument.
The combination of these factors has cemented the violin's reputation as the devil's instrument in popular culture." We here read that there was never a statement coming from the devil saying the violin belonged to him and, as with God, why would we care otherwise? A striking appearance and virtuosity is what would have 'reinforced' that: I am sorry, but that would also come from God, perhaps the description here is a bit satanized, so say glowing appearance instead. As for the art pieces, why should we allow those to exist or be around? Painting of the devil? God really does not like this sort of thing: only one God and that is Him. No art, at most books with illustrations or something, so that we see the devil's face, yet the devil has incarnated in the shape of 'my' 'father', therefore we know his shape and it has nothing to do with those. Hopefully he will still be alive and well when we get to Marcia Hope's time, so that we can interview him, since the satellite thing is already going to be on, and he is then going to tell us all and in those things we will be able to believe, at such time.
We tend to associate harps with God, though, like the praise from Psalms/bible appears associated with those. Would it then be the case that all praise should be done with the aid of harps if we sing it? Probably not. I am sure God prefers no instrument because those may come on the way to sincerity and grandiosity of the praise. A person who is creating the song as it goes or playing an instrument should not be able to think deeply about the words they are saying, yet that is a necessity for a good praise, as we saw (meaning those in my head) recently. We really need to feel the things we say, to the level of that 'knowing' of 'Jung' for it to be something Our God appreciates.
It also seems to be the case that music is for our entertainment, a gift from Our God, and the way we please Him is with actions, sacrifices and compliance instead. It seems that when the Ancient people, from Psalms, classified a praise as good, that was something to do with the music as well and their personal taste, therefore the person who is playing is then not worrying only about God, but also about the crowd that watches, what destroys the purity of the act of praise, like it is now polluted by the intentions of pleasing humans but, as 'Mother Theresa' said, it should be about us and God only.
Now, we do notice the person the YouTube refers to, in what regards reinforcement of the satanic theory, that the violin belongs to the devil, is a bit ugly, like he looks like 'Murillo', so has that enormous chin and so on, which could mean deformity or satanic looks (yet, I have never seen satan, so how can I tell if he is ugly or beautiful? At most I think black 'Nelson' is satan and he is not that ugly), yet he seems clean and tidy, even slim, and obesity does reinforce uglyness plus is satanic, since it means you overeat and do not exercise, therefore you do not take care of the house of your soul. Well, the man, according to the picture they present, is slim, actually very slim, clean and tidy in all his looks and at most he wears always black, as the presenter says, but then don't priests and Orthodox Jews also do that? We are used to be told they are holiest instead, so that black doesn't seem to mean satanic, like it is just one more color and it usually makes us become more elegant in presentation than the white color, usually associated with angels. Yet, black does close things and makes us less likely to receive good energy from the person, like it seems to block the transmission of energy from one being to another somehow and, indeed, they say the color black, in science, blocks the sun, so the light, which is usually associated with God. We also chose to dress black in funerals and we chose to say funerals are a reason for mourning instead of joy, so that it does not really make sense associating the same color to God's people. Then, once more, we have proven here that priests and Jews CANNOT be God's people and that may then match their choice of colors, finally, since God writes straight through tortuous lines. As another point, by giving him the gift of good music, God is making people stop noticing his ugly features, so say his chin, and connect to him via the sound of his soul instead and therefore he is being more blessed by God for some reason. The reason shouldn't ever be that he is demoniac, therefore we may cross that one out, please. I also observe that they have another picture of his in the beginning of the report and that one brings him wearing some white at the top, so that the claim is not even true, that he was always wearing black. The story involving the homicide is obviously not true, since we cannot even imagine how one can use intestines as strings of violin, please. Also, no human being should have the power to steal our souls: at most the devil, so the satanic system, these devices and so on. Now, it may be true that he was womanizing and drinking alcohol in excess, in case Our God could withdraw part or all of his blessing. Since they say he even played better or something, then he wasn't really womanizing or doing anything evil from that alcohol drinking habit. They invented all this, in the same way they invented the homicide. It is all satanic narrative. Then it is said that he died of cancer and refused the priest by the time of death. It might be that God punished him through the painful disease in that case, so while alive, and the priests are satanic creatures, so that refusing them should have no connection to being demoniac, like perhaps he could see beyond the established rules and that could imply even the opposite. They say his body was refused by the church and went around for a long time until 'the pope' forgave 'him'. Oh, God, what a long satanic string: a body contains no soul and therefore it makes no sense bothering about it but we decided, for hygiene and mourning purposes, to keep it intact and buried somewhere. The pope is an authority established by humans, not by God, and therefore he never had the rights to forgive the sins of anyone on earth: that is obviously only with the Lord and it is highest blasphemy to imagine they someday had this power. Shocking that these things would mean, so far, that this man was demoniac instead of most blessed. Notice, though, that you cannot get confused: the devil has been giving the essence of the original person to the usurper in some cases and that is then when God most worries about His kids, since he is protecting their history on earth in what regards at least a few things that mattered the most for us, humans, he is again using that usurper so that they still glorify the name/id of His creature, despite them being dead. We then imagine the IDs the devil preserves are those of the most gifted, most blessed by God, and those could then have their souls collected by God at that time, which was the time God decided meant completion of their cycle of evolution, more than likely, when they should then join Him and His wife in the Elohim Planet or paradise. May God bless!
No comments:
Post a Comment