https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0iUmsekIlA, they present arguments of the type if Jesus had 500 watchers witnessing his ressurection, as the apostle Paul claimed, then one of those people would have given us a written report on that, something history could hang on to, so say a book. That it would not be possible that only after 30 years or so of his death someone would come up with a written report/account or book. Yet, Copilot tells us that at most 5% of the populations of Nazareth and Jerusalem were literate, like everyone else couldn't really speak or write. It is then very acceptable that nobody wrote a line and for 30 years things went from ear to ear, sort of Chinese Whispers game, like until someone who could 'finally' read and write was found. They also say that, for us, Christians, the ressurection is what proves that God exists. That has to be wrong: even if the satanic had invented the entire New Testament, including the ressurection bit, which is probably not far from the truth, so all invented, we are left with our personal experiences and history of interaction of God with humans, and those are not just a few.
I believe everyone who follows 'my recipe', which I copy from the Bible, when requesting things from Our God, will get the truth about what they seek, so that if God thinks that is not OK for Him or anyone to give, He will let you know at the end of the sacrifice of fasting and prayer, and if He thinks He can give and is willing to give, He will let you know so as well, as He recently did to us. It is likely that Jesus, as a semigod, so mix of human genes with God's genes, could not ressurect, like we have reports on the lives of the other sons of God in the Bible, where those married human women and all else, and, if they had ressurected, we assume they would have written something about that somewhere. It is more likely that the Roman Empire member who later on testifies on Jesus being God in a letter we have become aware of, someone who asked to have the body of Jesus, finally got the body of Jesus and did whatever he wanted with it, so say performed autopsy to see if the genes were different from those of humans, like that would perhaps be the first thing we would do nowadays.
As we know, documents and reports on the lives of people disappear in full very easily, like it is 144 years the satanic usurp and disappear with all that matters about the life of the usurped. This is just 144 years, imagine 2025? They disappear with every possible trace of the life of the person, so that what others are saying on YouTubes is not true at all: that if they hate someone as they hated Jesus some documents would always survive, like what documents if they didn't even read or write? Well, the most likely thing is that this same Roman, who, just like hell, is full of 'good intentions', then did whatever he wanted with the reports on the life of Christ for eternity, like through his acquaintances and contacts. We must remember that the name of the Catholic Church is Roman Catholic Church, so that who would have 'taken care' of the 'word of God', for astonishing 2025 years, is the most blasphemious sinners of all, like The Jews and the Romans, exactly those who imposed that martyrdom to Jesus, so people who seriously could never be the choice of God in terms of communications in His name or reports on the existence of any of His people.
If we were satanic, now we know, we would like 'one-things', universals and absolutes, so that they would have invented several things to twist the message and make us go to hell instead of heavens, just like we saw the satanic did to Katryn's Kuhlman's life/history on earth: they there reduced her existence to healing, as if her healing power had come as a gift which could be given to absolutely anyone, as the usurper of her existence says, that anyone can have the Holy Ghost helping them heal. Obviously that the life of Katryn before she receives that power matters the most instead and here we could be referring even to her past life, so say she has healing powers since birth or something. They simplify, reduce and manipulate, as in rhetoric, with the objective of satanizing all, so that Jesus was not he and his wife, as the scriptures seem to refer to (the prophecy), in what could be still accurate despite all satanism involved, but a single person, travelling on his own in the desert for 40 days. They do that so that splitting husband from wife and taking the husbands to the desert, and only those, makes sense, there reinforcing the 'truth' of the story involving Adam, 'the first man': on his own, king of all (so to make it all be consistent).
They also say Jesus took the 'prostitute', Madaglene, with them to the desert. Yet, it is way more likely that those reports on his life in Egypt for a few years before the mother sent people after him, since she was being bullied in Nazareh and so on, like the Messiah had to start performing miracles, with him then marrying there, perhaps having a kid, as the prophecy seems to suggest, before he decides for coming back to where the mother was, as she was requesting that he did, are more accurate. Instead, the satanic would create a weird thing for Jesus, when we cannot tell if he was married or not, still with a prostitute, the most unholy woman therefore, the filthiest, what is not really acceptable or understandable (simply having intimate contact with such a creature would make the holy man not be able to have a pure heart or a clean soul anymore). It is obviously the case that Jesus at most stopped the stonning of the woman, just because no law regarding the men existed, just regarding the woman, and left her there, so behind them, and still had a loving wife that he got in Egypt before starting that part of the journey. It is also way more likely that he carried the entire family of those 12 apostles with him, not only the men, but the satanic want to reinforce that it is possible a holy man marrying an unholy woman and that it is possible for a man of God to split families and not be married himself before he starts teaching the word of God.
I had asked for the researchers to calculate the face of Jesus based on the information we have, so in Science, and they then came up with this face, which we see on the top of this YouTube. Yesterday, I spoke to this image feeling in me that it was Jesus indeed, so that I believe that might be his image for real. However, things could be in the same way they were with 'Tom Cruise': I connected to him as if he were my twin, so that it might be something spiritual, like Jesus using this image to communicate with me, as I believe it was the case with my twin. We really need God's Brainwashing and Marcia Hope to dig into this thing. Yet it is, at this stage, very unlikely that we can rely on the Bible to get any true information about his looks. Revelations apparently says his hair was white as wool and snow and his eyes were like blazing fire, so that is the New Testament. Isaiah says he had no beauty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that could make us 'desire' him (so here we see satanic language: desire is not a Christian word. Christians love, make love, but do not desire). The most reliable account on his looks would have to be the one provided by the king who offered him his town and asked him to come to heal his disease, so that who shows respect for him somehow, even though not complete (like he does not beg him, for instance, and talks about sharing the town with him, as if they both had the same power or deserved the same reverence). Yet, he never described Jesus' looks because the two never met: that was the King Abgar. Mary, the mother, or Joseph, the 'father', or the wife he acquired in Egypt, whoever they may be, would also have reliable descriptions but, unfortunately, if they knew how to read and write, their books have been destroyed or kept away from our sight so far by the satanic.
We also observe here that we can find no document to tell us if those three we just mentioned were literate or not or even the apostles. It could be that Jesus had asked Mary for advice, in what regards the apostles, so, he could have said, 'mum, who do you think is literate and could be a righteous person here?' Yet, there is nothing about literacy of those anywhere. That would be fundamental for us to judge if the apostles could have written those books themselves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IH69A4Z0iqQ, 'Kirk Cameron' here proves, with texts that also do not belong to the Bible, that the ressurection of Jesus was a true event.
May God bless!
