Saving Many Lives: Bible

I am writing a paper on 'Osama' and I then felt the need of citing where we find the quote 'writes straight through tortuous lines'. I then ended up seeing the fixing, which is 'crooked lines' and the particular website I visited brought Genesis 50:20 as origin of the quote. I then went there and there was a message for me: "20 You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives." May God bless!

Israel Has Once Worshiped Baal

https://shereadstruth.com/israel-worships-baal/ It says here that Israel once worshiped Baal and God punished them by killing 10s of 1000s of people. Yet I could not find any bible for Baal and we need to find this book, since there has to be one, in my humblest. The book should come from at most the Canaanites. May God bless!

There Is Only God

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0SPXfkzKwg, this professor makes one point: that we need God to make sure we all have altruistic feelings and morality. That, if we don't have the figure of the higher authority, we don't have where to ground those claims on morality and altruism, so that those are necessary for life in society. 'Nathaniel' says that humans are naturally altruistic and moral and the professor says that it may be so but at least sometimes we get people like 'Hitler'/the satanic (since we have proven Hitler was usurped and was, as for all evidence, actually a very good person), who don't care about how they get to feel good in society, so that they can appeal to homicide and usurpation of assets. It is then implied that, with God, so, if the usurpers were believers instead of satanic, that wouldn't have happened, and only with Him that wouldn't have happened. Of course, we must also talk about the love for wisdom, for true knowledge/information, so that perhaps that comes first, so making sure that all humans are set up to the same direction, which is achieving maximum development also of the spirit while on earth in the human shape. Our God gives us a few things but the main thing is wisdom, as we have been proving our entire lives, but mostly in the last segment of life, so last year, when we were closer to God because of being together somehow, me and him. He is the only God we KNOW gives us wisdom, therefore the pursuit for knowledge and information of true nature should logically lead to believing or following Him. May God bless!

Resurrection of Jesus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je9lI5jPTnQ, some good arguments to defend that Jesus did resurrect on the third day. By the way, Our God and Jesus DO NOT WANT TO OWN US, we belong to ourselves in what depends on them. Who wants to own us and does own us through the head bugs is the devil/satan/Al Qaeda instead. May God bless!

You Said It, Satanic!

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/2jUCquDOePA This wise woman talks about the sentence found in the satanic bible, Genesis 2:18, which got translated into 'I will make him a helper meet for him' in the King James version of the bible. She tells us that the meaning of the 'helper' used there, when the original Hebrew term is studied, is the same as that implied by God when saying He, therefore Our God, is a helper of Israel. She then makes a point: when we see the sigmatoid 'helper' there, the first idea that comes to mind is that of a secondary person, as in 'person who helps the primary person'. Yet, if God says He is a helper for Israel, it is obviously that God is not a secondary person there and the word, used in Hebrew, is the same in both cases. She says the meaning in Hebrew is that the woman is going to help in a way the man cannot help himself, which does coincide with what we said: no man can have the word of God if he remains unmarried. It is as if man can only be in sync with the Holy Ghost through the vibrations of spiritual love, which should be that of the human marriage. A man should marry at most when he has his first ejaculation, which, for some reason, in the bible, is associated with sleep time. I am not a man and I really don't know that part, yet we proposed that kids are put with a companion of the opposite gender since almost birth, if possible. If things go wrong, that they put someone else of the opposite gender with the kid and so on so forth. In this way, whenever time comes, all is available and coupleship should be the result. Now, having a wife does not yet qualify the man to becoming a spiritual guide, even though he could then teach, instruct, give talks and so on. He would need to be with his God's coupleship to be in that realm, of God authorizing him to speak in that quality. It is in this sense that the woman is the helper of man. May God bless!

Demons: Possession and Exorcism

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/zdEC10jEpns It is interesting watching this video. It looks true. We can study this during Marcia Hope as well. Yet, it is here for the curious mind. An idea that occurs to me on how to study this is using the head device: we then could easily see if there is brain activity of the person corresponding to her thinking about it, when the claimed possession could have been something like a short play instead. May God bless!

Buddhism: Compatible with Christianity?

So, this question came to me today through spiritual processes. I then stopped to think: A person can obviously be a Buddhist and also a Christian, but, if so, they cannot have statues of the Buddha or adore Buddha. God has to be above Buddha and Buddha is just a fellow enlightened human. I then asked Co-pilot if Buddha ever said he was a god. Co-pilot confirmed my suspicion: Never. I then asked if Buddha ever told people to build statues at his image or adore those. Co-pilot confirmed my suspicion: Never. Well, the rule is if the entity never said so, don't invent they did and don't do it, basically. Our God is radically against statues and, more specially adoration of those. Our God is also a jealous God: no other god at all, just Him. I don't know the philosophy of Buddhism that well but, from what I have heard and seen, there is no conflict with Christianity, nothing at all. May God bless!

Split Brain Problem: One Side is Atheist, The Other is a Believer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFJPtVRlI64 brings the following problem: a biological phenomenon took place and the brain of a certain person was split into half, both hemispheres creating their own consciousness. They then asked to one side if they believed in God, they said no. They asked to the other side, they said yes. In this case, is this person going to hell or heavens?

That is a good question, even though simply believing in God is not enough to qualify for heavens but it is obviously one of the requirements. Well, if that were a problem for the subject, they obviously wouldn't be able to say yes or no when asked that question from outside of their body. Yet the researcher says that his answer, from outside of the body, was a 'no', therefore they don't believe God is their internal conclusion. God does not seem to consider or judge our inner thinking, different from the devil: God considers our actions, more than anything else, like if you simply believe in God but don't do anything with that, so don't praise, don't pray, don't spread the word, don't do good, don't comply with His instructions, then you obviously don't go to heavens, like simply thinking means nothing. Now, verbalizing might mean something because you could be influencing someone else. In his example, he says the verbalization is 'no, I don't believe God', despite his confusion in the end of the video. That means no heavens for them, since that will influence others negatively in what regards Our God. Now, I do have a problem with this narrative: I can easily detect flaws. It is obvious to me that the person DOES NOT have full consciousness in each one of the sides because they are able to get to an agreement and utter a 'no', only one answer, with no mistake. If they had equal amount of consciousness in each one of the sides, they would be confused, obviously and trivially, like they could say a yes followed by a no, say nothing or whatever that meant confusion. I am sorry, but that is wrong science and I do suspect that non-believers will always commit some type of mistake in their research, quite sincerely.

I got to the conclusion that the researcher is a non-believer because we observe that he talks about the person preferring blondes or brunettes and that is satanic thinking, since, in that way, we see people as physicality only or first, yet we should see them with the eyes of the soul if we look for a God's coupleship, which is what everyone should be aiming at. I would think he is an atheist.

God: No Show Problem

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZZOaXkLGMY talks about Logic and what is reasonable for God to do if He wants us to believe Him. One of the things he does is asking what strategy God should use if He ever wanted to be the god of all of us, humans. The response that I chose was (to me obviously) that He should then communicate with us all at all times. Yet, as we know, Our God claimed to be the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, therefore of the Jews from way before Christ, so that He never really intended to be the god of the entire human kind. Using this reasoning, we could reach the logical conclusion that The Jews would need to fix themselves for God to show up again in the skies as He used to do up to the time of Christ, as I told the 'Jew' that showed up in my head recently to do. Yet, we definitely would like to believe that God wants to be the God of all of us, as Jesus preached, according ot the Roman Empire, who is who effectively wrote the bible, which nowadays we call Christian but is actually satanic, as explained before. We also had proof recently, through my fasting and prayer sequence, that God exists, is alive and still communicates with us, just that He does that through the Holy Ghost. We also have proof that God sent us as one soul to fix the world, human kind, get us all rid of the devil and its hell's creatures, such as satan, so me and twin. Now, if the Jews never fix themselves, despite God having reduced them to usurpers (like yet to be proven, but that being the intuition that comes to me), so to no Jewish blood, and second chance for the 'same' ID, we probably have to convert, all of us, and then leave these Jews out of the circle of trust to see if they finally apologize to the world, human kind and God in the ways we described, so all of them, absolutely all of them, who are alive and appear as Jews, and, if they finally do what I said recently to the one who showed up in my head, all of them, our God will probably show up again. Notwithstanding, that is not a requirement for us to know what we must do, as explained before. That is obviously luxury, like you do not need to meet the CEO of a company in person to learn what you need to do in your job there, basically, like you can learn that from a leader or a manager, actually even from a more experienced fellow, so that is what we are, one of those, you decide which. It is nice if you do, like you feel valued, yet why would God give you even more value, where is your merit? We are all satanic at the moment, even us, some more some less, yet all satanic, having a mechanical soul in place of our original soul, put in us by Our God, a soul made of brainwashing, satanic brainwashing. So, yet other arguments for you to accept that we do need Our Solution implemented ASAP, starting with God's Brainwashing. May God bless!

The Bible: Why The Soul Is not in the Womb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8OyGdBNFqI&t=1s misquotes a passage from the bible. Please acknowledge that the passage refers exclusively to Jeremiah, an extremely special case, so much so that God decides to talk about that, when He never did that with the other prophets, so, exclusively in Jeremiah's case, God had his soul ready before the body was formed, basically, so that his birth, with that body, was certain, would definitely happen, meaning that was a prophecy and nothing could happen to his mother that would stop his growth and birth. Of course it depends on what we define as this 'you' God refers to, like would that be soul plus body or just soul. Then we assume the body is just a vessel and God sees our soul all the time instead, so, in our best theory so far, God would see that matter, which is invisible to our eyes, but gets stuck to our neurons and memory after we are out of the womb. God knows us means God knows our soul to most people, I am sure, so that is what it actually means and there is no conflict with what we said before. Here the entire passage, so without satanic manipulation/deviation from intended meaning: "The Call of Jeremiah

The word of the Lord came to me, saying,

“Before I formed you in the womb I knew[a] you,

before you were born I set you apart;

I appointed you as a prophet to the nations.”

It is then clear that the passage refers exclusively to Jeremiah. Yet, even so, it is not true as it is currently read from the NIV, since, in Hebrew, the words "you in the womb", according to https://biblehub.com/jeremiah/1-5.htm, are "ḇab·be·ṭen" and the words "I knew you" are "yə·ḏa‘·tî·ḵā" and therefore there is absolutely no word in common between the two groups of words, which means the 'you' from one group is radically different from the 'you' in the second group, if nothing else. I theorize that at most one means body and the other means soul, so that the passage means 'Before I formed your body in the womb I knew your soul' instead, if nothing else. Yet yadatika, according to Co-pilot, means 'like/as I knew' or 'as/like I have known', so that there is absolutely nothing else, so definitely no you. Yet this is the satanic bible, not the Christian one, as we have proven before, so that its passages shouldn't really be considered. Besides, Hebrew is now a satanic language, the language the devil has used to induce us all to highest possible mistake and, unless we have our God's Brainwashing going, we are never going to have the slightest clue about the actual meaning of these words in Hebrew, not even that. Yet, if you believe we belong to God, and I have already explained and proven beyond limit that we do, me and twin, plus if you believe God is always sending messengers to earth, like us, it is just that we stopped listening to the right ones or paying attention, and the devil was always killing and replacing them with satanic people, as we saw, then you know the message is renewed, not static, and therefore the thing is going with what we are saying now. Sometimes we use bits of the bible here and there because that seems to be the correct message but you cannot make of that a rule, as explained before. Once more, being literate cannot be a requirement for entering heavens, so that Our God wouldn't do that, like forcing you to read His words from a book. There are still those who are blind and don't have resources, if nothing else. Once more, and that bit is true, God does not appear to Jacob the first time and says, 'so, Jacob, now please go and read what happened between me and Isaac, then come back in two days' time, and I will tell you what you must do', no, God is about here and now, please.

If whoever is speaking to you insists that the soul is prepared by God in advance of the body being born and therefore is already assigned to that particular body before the birth of the human being, you remind them of the stillborn babies: so, what happened to those, did God fail? That is obviously blasphemy in highest degree, since God would not fail in His calculations, please. May God bless!

Pact with the devil

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkqKLcxB9WE brings a PhD in Philology who studied such things in the available literature. He then proved that what appears in history as rite to obtain a pact with the devil is summoning them and writing a contract in blood. My theory is that there is no such a thing and all that is Al Qaeda, basically, like, were it nowadays, they would simply use the bug and give the stuff to the person while keeping their soul as they made it be, mechanical/satanic/in hell. I now have thought of how we can prove that there is no such a thing, having already explained, in another post, why that is not plausible, like, if pacts with the devil exist, then it would not be a written contract where the devil or his creatures, such as demons, have not signed: we will get a volunteer, so someone, who different from us, doesn't fear this sort of thing, so ending up with the soul in hell, and they will go through a rite that has been claimed to be the one that works on camera after saying what will be the gift/power they will request that the devil gives them in exchange for their soul, so let's say we determine it will be higher IQ, just because that would be a good one for us to check immediately after the supposed pact. They will then go through the rite after we measure their IQ. If the IQ doesn't change after all the stuff has been said and done, we have proven that such a thing does not exist. In the same way, we can prove macumba doesn't work or voodoo, so that we actually can, and will, have serious scientific research about those things, which, so far, are left out of the mainstream science, obviously for pure bias of the satanic, who have an interest in keeping this stories going. We obviously can, and will, interview figures such as Dynamo at that stage, since God's Brainwashing will be on and so on. They will then tell us how their pact took place and I think I am sure it had no contract whatsoever. We will then invent ways of proving their souls are indeed in hell, so say the sparkles in the eyes that we seem to have isolated as factor that means we are in permanent contact with our soul or it is detached from our bodies/blocked somehow. We can also make use of mediums and things like that. I had suggested that they created a discipline called Phenomenology at a certain stage so that we could study this sort of thing in it. I now found out they already had this name associated with other type of research (apparently since 1900), so that is why they didn't do that when I asked, like the name already existed, yet they could have created a new discipline with yet another name. According to Co-pilot, "Phenomenology is the study of structures of experience and consciousness. It focuses on how we experience things and the meanings that things have in our experiences. The goal is to describe phenomena as they are perceived by individuals, without any preconceived notions or interpretations." That means we could study this sort of thing only from the perspective of how it feels, what is obviously not enough to prove actuality of things. We can and will, if Our Plan gets executed, create a new discipline for that sort of study, like the other possibility would be Religion, but that also does not make sense here.

Hell: A Nun Received a Revelation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVXKpBgIibg says that there is purgatory, so not sure that it is saying that there is hell, like are they the same and one thing? Anyway, this is Sister Mary of the Cross (Elisa Sofia Clementina Eber), who existed in France in the 19th century and she got a message in 1873 that says there are 3 levels of purgatory and, by the time of the judgement, God Himself appears and we then see everything we have done in life before us, thus understanding how little we are and all that is involved in our condemnation if we are condemned. Who sent the message was Sister Mary Gabriella. She says that the longing for God is an unceasing martyrdom and the sufferings are extreme. That the souls suffer but do not complain. That the souls know that punishment is just and that every suffering brings them closer to heaven. That each purification is necessary for their complete union with God. The burning desire to see The Lord is their greatest torment. That that is also a source of hope and consolation. That the prayers of the living aleviate their pains and make liberation quicker. That the soul in purgatory perfectly understands divine justice and sees how imperfect it was during its earthly life. That they then embrace the process of purification with love as a gift of God's mercy. That she spent 2 years in the Great Purgatory without experiencing any relief in an indescribable pain that penetrated every fiber of being and consumes with a purifying fire that gives no respite. Then, for one year, she was on the second purgatory, where suffering is still very great but accompanied by a vivid hope because they begin to glimpse the light of divine mercy and to understand God's infinite goodness. That she then finds herself in the third purgatory, the least painful, where there is no longer fire but an ardent desire to see God.

She says that the souls in purgatory love each other with a pure and selfless love, for they know they are united in the same destiny of purification and eagerly wait for the day they will be able to see God face to face again. We then notice discrepancy between this letter and the other one, received by the other nun, which we published here too, since there the lady says that the souls hate each other in hell. Yet, what I am thinking now is that there is purgatory and hell, two different places we may go after death, so that there are three places, since to those we must add paradise. That was a nun, so that her sins would have to be something that may demand light punishment, and, for the heavy sinner, say killers, they go to hell, where there is probably no way out and the soul, from there, is destroyed, as said before, so that the nun's soul evolved and will soon be with God once more but the same doesn't happen to the other one. This letter is even more credible than the other one, since it comes from a nun, the message was sent by another nun, there is year, full name of the nun who received it, location and so on.

Co-pilot confirms our intuition (that there is hell and purgatory, two different places our soul may go after death): "The Bible does mention hell, often referred to as Gehenna or Hades, and it is described as a place of punishment for the wicked after death. However, the concept of purgatory is not explicitly mentioned in the Bible. Purgatory is a doctrine more commonly associated with the Roman Catholic Church, which teaches that it is a temporary state of purification for souls who have died in a state of grace but still need to be purified of venial sins before entering heaven." May God bless!

Valentin Felixovich Voyno-Yasenetsky: Russian Icon, Researcher

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPGz2ewseZI, finally some serious theory about the soul, body and heart. This researcher studied these entities for long and came up with these conclusions. He apparently believes that who does all the thinking is actually the soul. Co-pilot says the following about his results/thinking: "Regarding his thoughts on the body, heart, and soul, Voyno-Yasenetsky viewed a person as a triune psychosomatic organism. He described the body as the physical integrity of all organs and systems, the soul as a combination of organic and sensory perceptions, memories, thoughts, feelings, and acts, and the spirit as a smart, strong-willed, life-giving principle. He emphasized the importance of the "inner man" (spirit and soul) dominating the flesh." Because they got his name wrong in the video, I assume Co-pilot has more accurate information about him. Co-pilot says he never stated that the brain does not do the thinking. In the quote above, he seems to be saying who does the thinking is the soul. His formation seems to be in Medicine, though. Co-pilot says he is called Saint Luke as well. May God bless!

Reincarnation III: More Proof?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBoNznZXUD8 brings one more case. Also this one was something Leinha would have conversed with me about, so that it is also satanized, not a genuine case to make us prove reincarnation, unfortunately. She would have found someone to go through the library documents and put the information in his head. Besides, I now clearly remember her asking me like this, 'a man is starring at the water, what is he thinking?' I then think she thought I could have contact with the spiritual world, for some reason, like she could give me a prompt like that and the spirit would then tell me. I remember having asked her why that was important, who that man was and things like that. She told me nothing. I then said, he probably jumped in the water for you to be asking me that or something, and she then would ask me yet another question like, if I could see the water and I actually saw exactly this sight of water in my head, I now remember. She then asked for more details, if I was imagining something. The way I 'lived' life was like that, like I then simply felt that image in my head and went with it, as if it were all very natural, so that I answered I can only think that he jumped into the water. For some reason, back then, I did think it had been death, that the man had died. She then put it there just like that, what obviously does not make any sense: a person who simply jumps into the water cannot die from drowning, which is how they say he died, unless he had a heart attack already before jumping into the water. May God bless!

Reincarnation II: More Proof?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQZknnZpgDg brings the story of Ray Bryant. He would have been regressed by an hypnotherapist and he then said he was in the Crimea. They then got the name of the soldier he would have been, Reuben Stafford. They then confirmed facts with him by means of documents they were able to retrieve from the library. Ray said he had never done any research into the Crimea before that date and he described precisely how the army forces male died. The time of such events would have been after the 1900s, which means it could have been the marginal. Unfortunately, the marginal has now made me remember that also this one was me conversing with Leinha, like sorting out how it was going to be, basically, when I was little. Leinha seems to then have a relationship with this show as well. Once more, we can only get to the truths of all that matters on earth if we get Our Plan in place. May God bless!

Reincarnation: More Proof?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrcX16GOGic, so this movie brings people who ended up attending the same hypnotherapist's office. First it was Maureen Williamson. She then described things that happened more than 135 years ago in detail. After a few sessions she mentioned the name of a person who lived in the same location as hers. They went after that person and asked him to accept being hypnotized by the specialist. While under hypnosis, he told similar story, details were also compatible. Maureen then came up with yet another name from that location in yet another session. The second male initially refused to take part into such a thing, but, some three years passed, he accepted. Believe it or not, also him, under hypnosis, told similar story, details that were compatible. Maureen claimed she was married to one of them at such a time before they hypnotized him and he said the same thing under hypnosis. The name of the place the three of them, in separate sessions, told the hypnotherapist was the same, so that she looked for it on a map and the three went there. Everything they said was then confirmed. They seem to have recorded things in real time as they went to the location together, the three of them. The male who was supposed to be the husband in the past life then led them to a house and to the second level of the house, when he then pointed at a particular bedroom and said that was his. In separate, Maureen took them to the same house and pointed at the same bedroom while saying it was theirs. Since this happened 135 years ago and the marginal should have gotten his first head bug about 144 years ago, we may finally have a solid proof of reincarnation being a fact at least sometimes. According to what they say, finding out these things led to no change in their current lives, so that the function of all might have been simply telling that the wife was murdered back then. The hypnotherapist, like myself, seems to worry about the fine detail: if the two found out they were married in that life, shouldn't they be together also in this one? The answer is no, like they both came back to their respective spouses from current times. I believe we have to keep on incarnating until a few things happen and one of them is finding our half, our spiritual match. I will make us invest in research of this type during Marcia Hope as well: we should obviously make comparative studies to see if there was an improvement in the match between husband and wife this time, or in their earthly experiences/physical qualities, or in their wisdom levels, if nothing else. Material like this is rarest and we can only start studying these things seriously once God's Brainwashing is on. Another piece of information that is important from this video is that, according to their research, half of the world believes in reincarnation. They also confirm what we have already said (some evidence was presented): that the satanic bible, so the current Christian bible, had reincarnation in it for a time but those satanic things, such as inquisition, eliminated such contents/teachings. As I wrote this and gave the case as closed, that we definitely have reincarnation, the marginal made me recall Leinha talking about similar thing with me, like her asking me what could be done to impress people in what regards the topic, so that this would also have been my idea, unfortunately. They were then all bugged and Leinha would have managed the process of collection of information and insertion of images and information in their heads. The reason as to why I thought that was not possible is because I imagined she would have to have had bugged those three people from the past to learn such details. Yet that 'finally' does explain why the memories would not come for the two of them, the couple, to be together again. It is all very unfortunate. May God bless!

Longinas: The Roman Centurion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RB98-W1PuU brings the story of 'Saint' Longinas. It is all so absurd that, if nobody had told me it were possible, I wouldn't really believe. Basically, the satanic invented that the centurion who brutally attacked the side of Jesus when he was on the cross, making Jesus' body expel blood and water, got blessed by Jesus, like the message is basically 'attack the holy figure to get their favors'. Obviously not! That absolutely never happened. God does not have any mercy: only Jesus does. The satanic then implies that one can steal God's favors somehow, first of all, so not be a believer or a follower and still get His favors, not have minimum respect for not even the body of the holy figure and still get miracles to their side and physical violence against the holy ones is a means to get blessings. The complete inversion of all: only the satanic could do things like this, quite sincerely. Here, once more, we obviously don't have any reliable records of the history of this man on earth, Longinas, and I find it hard to believe even that one can prove that he was ever alive, like we don't even have a surname. The marginal does that repeatedly: no first name, if first name no surname, no location, no date, no time and so on, yet narratives in which we are supposed to believe as if they were real-life stories. 'My' 'grandmother', 'Maria Ribeiro Ricci', used to recite a line each time she lost something: 'Sao Longuinho' something. I now forgot her line. Basically, this 'saint' would be the one for lost items. We have already seen that saints is a wrong thing, then now I believe this 'Sao Longuinho' translates into 'Saint Longinas' and therefore you can only be joking, like this can only serve as more support to the idea that saints should all have their kingdom attacked and finished, basically.

I am thinking that if one accepts this narrative as factual, then one can easily extend the reasoning involved and therefore all atrocities against the Christians, or the holiest figures around, perpetrated by the marginal are made acceptable and still very logically justified: they could then enjoy our blessings. Oh, God!

Herman The Recluse: Czech Republic Icon, Religion (The Devil's Bible Writer)

We hear about this figure when watching the YouTube video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0djS7abKM. He is then told to have been a Benedictian Monk who had been condemned to be bricked alive and starved to death (is this really something that can be told in books and not lead to the end of the Catholic Church, I wonder), yet nobody is able to tell what sin he committed, not even that. This man would then have proposed a deal to the abbot of the monastery: that he gave him one day for him to write a book containing all knowledge available in human kind in exchange for saving his life. Unable to write everything in time, he appeals to the devil and the devil then helps him write the Codex Gigas, a 75 Kg tome. The problems with this are several: Wikipedia has a different report and says that the deal was 1 year instead of 1 day and that is way more reasonable and a person could definitely have the time to write this tome in one year. All the knowledge of human kind resumed to only a few areas of knowledge, as we see mentioned in the own video, so that it was, by no means, all knowledge available. Besides, the contents of the book are clearly plagiarism, as we can read from Co-pilot: "The "Devil's Bible," also known as the Codex Gigas, is a large medieval manuscript created around the early 13th century. It contains a variety of texts, including:

The Complete Latin Bible: Both the Old and New Testaments in the Vulgate version.

Works of Flavius Josephus: "Antiquities of the Jews" and "The Jewish War".

Isidore of Seville's Encyclopedia: "Etymologiae".

Chronicle of Cosmas of Prague: "Chronica Boemorum".

Medical Texts: An early version of the "Ars medicinae" compilation of treatises, and two books by Constantine the African.

Other Texts: Various shorter texts on topics such as penitence and exorcism.

The Codex Gigas is also famous for its full-page portrait of the Devil, which is where it gets its nickname. Despite its ominous name, the manuscript is a remarkable piece of medieval literature and art."

The portrait of the devil is absolutely ridiculous, like a cartoon sort of thing.

I am sure, after examining the information available to us, that this book was no miracle, was written in one year (consisted of simply copying the work of others!), and does not contain the full knowledge of human kind from that time, like there are many things that were known at that time that are not present, such as Engineering and Architeture.

In this case, the monk got revolted with his monastery and called the abbot devil, since he had a deal with him instead. There is nothing that he has written in the devil's bible that implies he got it through a deal with the devil and he was a benedictian monk, so that this is like 99.9% unlikely. To become this type of monkey, according to Co-pilot, he would have studied at least 5 full years the liturgy of the Catholic Church, which means heaviest brainwashing as possible against the devil. It is realistically impossible that this man would have said he got the book through the devil or any agreement with it. Saying that is again satanism: that is a satanic narrative of the life of this man, for God's sake. We don't say such a thing about people unless we are absolutely sure, specially about people who are supposed to be those who least sin on earth. No, please, let's fix this one more biography. The video further states that it was weird that the book was written on vellum, which is animal skin. Yet, I asked Co-pilot and it told me that that was common practice back then, so that there is nothing special about that either. The video then says that the book would take a normal person 20 to 30 years to write, yet, in the same way we have reports on it taking 1 day, we have reports on it taking 1 year, so that we may as well say anyone could have said 20 years and it would be all the same, quite sincerely, like we don't have anything proving that the book started being written at a certain date and had its last page written at another, so that it is all guesses. The presenter states that if Herman had taken 30 years to write the book then the book would present change of calygraphy style somewhere but it doesn't. Co-pilot helps with this one: "(I asked if there is any book written by human hands during a period of more than ten years that presented no change in size or shape of letter) One example is the Book of Kells, an illuminated manuscript Gospel book in Latin, containing the four Gospels of the New Testament. It was created around 800 AD and is known for its intricate and consistent calligraphy, although it was likely produced by multiple scribes over several years." Basically, we get to know that the writing was 'the same' even though the scribes were different, so that there the argument is stopped. The presenter also talks about ermine loincloth having been used to cover the genitalia of Herman's drawing of the devil as being something special, as if he revered the devil since the royals were told to dress in such fabric. Well, I consulted Co-pilot and found out that the ecclesiastic garnments were made of those when the priests had highest ranks. In this case, he was probably calling the abbot a devil if the fabric of the nappies of the devil are supposed to mean something. I observe however that my first impression was that of a ridiculous figure, so that I see absolutely no respect for the devil whatsoever and, if for the presenter, that looks like a royal attire, to me it looks like nappies, calling the devil a retarded person, which I do think is adequate, a person who did not grow up. The presenter also talks about 10 missing pages of the book possibly containing he devil's prayer and, because of that, having been removed: Mary Madaglene's book had 9 pages missing and nobody ever said that about hers. Mark's gospel is missing entirely and again nothing like that was invented, so that there is no reason for such a belief. As a last point, though, worth adding, his book has nothing to praise the devil or his creations or rhetoric, so that we should definitely change its name, from devil's bible to Herman's Book or something. May God bless!

Christoph Heizmann: Austrian Icon, Painter

This YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0djS7abKM, says this man signed actual paper contracts with the devil and even though he met the devil and the image of the devil was human, the pact he then acquired with him, of being given talent and fame for his paintings for 9 years, returned nothing in practice to him, like he still had the same mediocre performance during those 9 years. The devil would have said he would come after his soul after 9 years and Christoph started having convulsions exactly 9 years after the contract was made. He signed two contracts: one by ink and another by blood. Freud would have examined him and determined he had a mental problem instead of a genuine experience with the beyond. It seems unreasonable that an entity that does not belong to this world would ask for contracts that belong to it. To make it worse, we never see the devil signing those in any of the reports on paper contracts with him, but, if he demands such, it would be expected that he would also sign them, isn't it? Well, once more, the devil doesn't wait: he puts the soul immediately in hell. I don't believe on a single apparition of a single 'saint': first of all, saints are not creatures of God. They are creatures of the Catholic Church. As such, they don't have such power. Notice here that, if such a thing existed, and therefore if the Catholic church ever represented God on earth (since that is definitely their claim and attitude), such a thing would always have existed. Yet, as far as we know, apparitions of saints 'exotically' coincide with the start of existence of the Catholic Church (it is like this: you only learn if you are wise. On AD 30-33, according to Co-pilot, the (Roman: therefore that one, of Joseph of Arimathea) Catholic Church starts. On AD 40, the first ever recorded apparition of a saint is recorded. God!!!). It also looks like one more flavor of the 'same': putting together a satanic book and imposing it to the Christian churches as the only truth. In this case, Christoph never actually saw the saint in question. Everyone else who had a pact with the devil claims to have received what they asked in return, so that this is also not matching history of contact with the devil that we know about. That is then, all together, perhaps plus some extra, what led 'Freud' to conclude it was all mental, rather than actual. We are with 'Freud' on this one too. I am not so sure about how those people would have claimed to have seen things they have not seen when they were not mentally ill. Notwithstanding, nowadays we know what the satanic did in those few cases we here studied (in these Blogger blogs), so that we imagine similar things took place: they could have done voice to skull on the people who hallucinated, those people could have simply lied to help the Catholic Church at their own will, it could be that the Catholics always kept secrecy of the important data (who saw, when, where, what time, full name and contact details of those who saw, so that we can speak to them directly) and so on. May God bless!

Francesco Bartos: Italian Icon, Arts (Sculptor)

This man got caught by Inquisition, as https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0djS7abKM shows: the reason would be that nobody, at that time, believed he himself had shaped marble in such a delicate and complex way. Inquisition accused him of collaborating with the devil. He had to then prove that it wasn't by shaping marble in front of the court staff. His work is satanic: one that is a statue and any statue is satanic, two that people are naked in those and one of them seems to even contain a skull on top of a baby sort of flying on the top of a tree and very distant from its possible carers. It is said that, back then, they believed demons could make objects appear from nowhere, similar to magicians. I wouldn't say his work is admirable to me because I don't like statues or naked people that be not my husband and at most me, even so, without an audience. In this case, it may as well have been made by the devil, just that it would be the 'devil in him'. He then would have achieved the spiritual entitlement to those skills, when Jesus, who is the manager of the life in-between earth and heavens, would have awarded those to him according to his choice, so following a model that is similar to the one we will have after Marcia Hope starts in what regards the bug and the centrals. Yet, he would have chosen, using God's free choice, to apply those skills to satanic activities. That should mean he chose the devil as his Lord, since whoever is not with Our God is with the devil, but there is a chance he never learned the word, like never attended a Christian church or read what we are now calling satanic bible but, so far, is known as the Christian bible. In this way, he could not know that those things were wrong, when God may forgive and still accept him in heavens. May God bless!

John Lennon: English Icon, Music

They say, on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0djS7abKM, that John Lennon would have gone to a bridge at midnight because there was a story going around saying that whoever went to that bridge at midnight would see the devil. That he formed his band in 1960 and only succeeded in creating the 'wow' effect on the audience after he made such a deal. What we found out, and publish here, is that he got usurped. We don't know when exactly that happened, since the information we have access to at the moment is very limited. I would think that that is an absurd lie, so that they marginal/satanic create that story to try to defend that the usurper is better than the original. I am sure God would only allow the original Lennon to go like that if he were ready for ascension, like the time of learning with that body and ID was over for him for some reason, and this reason was probably that he planned, with his heavenly tutor, in the spiritual realm, spending that limited amount of time in that shape and identity before incarnating. The need for the ID to keep on going has probably to do with the dreams or requests of his parents to God, like perhaps they wanted a son that shone highest, was recognized by his art and marked history or something. The usurper probably stole his essence via bug, so that the talent that made the usurpers ascend probably came from the originals. That is probably the place where the first usurpation took place, like where they killed the original Lennon. To make him go there, they would have bugged him first to then brainwash. That was to justify the satanic narrative they would later on impose to his history on earth. We observe that the narrator never mentions statements of the own Lennon that prove that to us, so that that would have been known by someone, who, we conclude, was obviously the marginal, so that whoever got this token of information, and we believe that is the presenter of the video, got it from the marginal. Leinha actually talked to me about this bridge thing, I now remember, so that she can help us clear the history of Lennon (provided that, at that stage, she is alive and well, like the same version of Leinha as well, so the same multiple) after God's Brainwashing is on. The presenter ads that the devil would come back after 20 years to collect his soul. Here we observe that the devil 'cashes' immediately, not after 20 years or the enjoyment, like the soul goes to hell immediately and lives there permanently too, probably being destroyed after enough punishment has been applied, just like the satanic bible says. Yet, satan, when allowing the usurpation to happen, or making it possible, could easily have told the usurper that they would only have 20 years of usurpation of that particular ID, like they may remain alive and usurp yet another or they may be killed, in there copying the process of after-death of God, like making the equivalent happen in the human life realm, this given that they split life in 5 blocks of 20 years, as said before. The symbology involved is that they would have to 'return' the essence of that ID to the devil, that is, they will have to use another or their own, so the mechanical or satanic soul. That 'Lennon' would have said that they were bigger than Jesus: no, obviously not, who said that was the usurper in case that was indeed said by 'Lennon'. They say a certain man, who appeared to be connected to satanism, would have appeared on the cover of one of the Beatles' albuns. That was obviously the touch of the usurpers, once more, not of the original 'Lennon'. The same with the cover where babies appear beheaded and bleeding and stuff: the marginal then had the intentions of trivializing such crimes through brainwashing. The same with the story of saying he was possessed when speaking to photographers: usurpers' thing to spread and trivialize satanism, so now being possessed would allow a person to perform activities that are considered normal (obviously not possible). Cases of possession are studied by the Catholic Church for ages and kept as secret, no images taken, by the satanic, who obviously have an interest of not showing what actual possession looks like. Even so, they let some images available online of pretty bad cases, which I am sure you can see if you try. Yet, he was probably referring to the device in his head, thinking about it, so maybe the marginal didn't like that particular usurper very much and imposed a little martyrdom to him each time he was being photographed, quite possible. If the pictures showed 'Lennon' with looks of possessed or demoniac, then that was the reason: to brainwash us, trivialize satanism again, associate good things, such as good sounds and nice looks, to evil stuff. I actually just remembered Leinha again: she managed this guy's head. She told me the reason they did that: it is apparently that they didn't like his ways a lot, like maybe they feared he would get too proud of his own image or maybe he enjoyed having his pictures taken too much or something. I now think she was probably having sex with him, that particular usurper and she then handled him that way or something. 'Imagine there is no heaven' 'or hell below us' is something they also mention as satanic: indeed, it seems that, so far, we need God to punish the really evil people, like human kind, so far, is powerless to manage those adequately, but there is very little in the satanic bible about heavens and hell. The message of the lyrics is mostly positive even though it has this line: 'a brotherhood of men'. That means he also ignores women, as all satanists, like they are not someone, otherwise they would have said 'a siblinghood of humans or something. 'Nelson' has that plan of having, in the end, only men, as said before, so that is compatible and indeed brainwash us with that being a good thing, therefore it makes men more likely to join their system. At the same time, satanic is any message that makes us be deceived and there is certainly heavens and hell, even though, at the moment, I am unable to provide a full account on those that be 100% accurate. We need Our Plan coming to life to be able to do better and that includes the twins of God as one in flesh. the video mentions Mark David Chapman, assassin of 'Lennon'. This guy is innocent, since he was used by Leinha to kill him, nothing else: he is obviously bugged. He is one of the many names in human history that need to have their history recovered by us during the execution of Our Plan and onwards. It looks like 'the devil' killed the usurper 20 years later in this case, so no chance for a new usurpation. May God bless!

Jonathan Moulton: American Icon, Army General

Defamation is everywhere, since the world is ran by the satanic for ages, as said many times now: this man was a Brigadier General, which is a bit lower than a General, still part of the 5 top positions of the army, yet the video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZQrw3caM3w, makes us think this man was a soldier instead. They then talk about unexplainable wealth, yet a General should receive a reasonable pay, just like when 'Braganca' became a General in Brazil. I observed that from close, so that I really know: the armed forces salaries are no way spectacular and the soldiers barely have what to eat, like me when enjoying the IPRS from Australia in 2001, so with about 10k per year, which means not enough for a person to live on their own in a place satisfying Gropious' Laws, which should be the basic need of a researcher. I would bet he simply had gotten the minimum thing, like I don't see them referring not even to cars, so imagine airplanes and things like that. In this video, which is supposedly all evidence they could find on the man being a satanic person, only a house is mentioned as his property, so they don't even refer to size of land, which should mean wealth. Basic needs, like all other officers of the army, things getting a bit better when they get to Colonel or something. The own satanic, in this video, say he was a 'legendary civil war hero', so how can a man be such and still be demoniac, we wonder, and then the things that came to mind is that perhaps the people he defended were not Christians but we then know he was American and the civil war would then have been a war inside of America but the detail that is not told in the video and appears in Wikipedia is that that was the independence war of America, against the British, therefore they were defending freedom of God's chosen people from oppressive forces and that was then Christian against Christian, in principle, but Our God is against domination by force of other Christians, only accepting that in what regards people of other beliefs, so that the English were not really being Christians there, just claiming to be, and therefore the applauded participation of this man in the war was not a satanic thing. The video says he was despised by the 'poor puritan population' of where he lived, despite his war glories. The fact that they say 'puritan' implies that the General would have sinned or would have been impure. Yet, the only sin they seem to mention would be that of 'flaunting his wealth over their faces'. His wealth, once more, is a house, if we understand well. We observe the person presenting never said money. That is then absurd claim, which is not seen in Wikipedia, despite it being a satanic vehicle and it doing wrong lots of times. They then say he was satanic because he had too much money, that being the first cause of the claim. We have then canceled this one. The second cause would be that he married another woman too quickly after his wife passed away, yet on Wikipedia we see that that he married the other one one year after the wife's death. One year is not too quickly: too quickly would have been next day or month or semester or something. Yet, they are right: the husband, if the marriage is Christian, should remain single after the wife dies. At the same time, a match made in heavens would usually mean the two die together or close to each other in time. It is not easy to find our heavenly match in this world and most men from the military would be brainwashed with marrying the first woman that appears in their lives, a practical thing: men need to solve that problem to be allowed to have the etereal wisdom, the word of God on earth, and so on. The military then decides for pretending that they solved that problem in the same way they brainwash them with things such as that your Country/nation/people are worth your life, like all military does that to them, regardless of how unChristian the people or nation is. If men are not brainwashed, they will obviously desert at a certain stage of the thing, like they won't fight the entire battle or fight. It is their soul versus brainwashing, as it is with me and the highly satanized world we live in: as said before, it is truly difficult even proving to yourself that you have been brainwashed. He then obviously did not have his heavenly match with him and therefore it was easier for him to marry another woman than it would be for most people in the town he lived. Again, no satanism or deal with the devil. We observe that, if someone has such, people get to be told by them they do at a certain stage, since satan wishes for advertising that whenever the gain could come across as something good and that obviously depends on the others praising whatever they do as if it were admirable. May God bless!

Holy Musical Instrument: Is that Possible?

So, we heard the YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZQrw3caM3w, and couldn't believe what they said also about violins: that they are the devil's instrument. First of all, any musical instrument, therefore any work of art that allows for sound to come out of it, could be used to praise our Lord and He could enjoy its sounds. A violin, in particular, has one of the most beautiful sounds we find, like 'Andre Rieu' is extremely popular and people seem to love his sound, some Christians included among those. There is obviously not such a thing as the devil's musical instrument. The devil should not like music: he should like at most noise, so maybe things such as punk or hardcore and, even so, probably not that he will like listening to those himself, he just likes the effect of those. Satan, however, who works on the demoniac system, does use noise as a tool to satanize people. The noiser a melody is, the more likely it is to deprive us from our natural judgement, therefore the more it will induce us to commit crime, therefore to sin in highest degree. All violin music I've heard has got harmony, like it is always all very interesting, if not pleasant. No way this is or was ever true then. There should be no such a thing as a demoniac or devil's thing, like an object charged with demoniac spiritual energy: the devil builds nothing. He just destroys everything and everyone. Objects were build by people and, as 'my' Seicho speaker taught, they contain the love of the person for human kind (I am changing the teaching a little bit): everything human kind builds should contain the love of the builder for us all, since, even when it does not make immediate sense to us, say someone put a bunch of sticks together and wrapped them on a lace and gave that to us, it still means the soul of those building it, so that those sticks would still mean something, even if it is a message of the type 'I am in spiritual trouble', and communication is loving others, is trying to connect to them somehow. We have to then investigate the reasons for such a popular belief. Co-pilot then helps us again: "(I asked: who invented that violin is the devil's instrument and why?)The idea that the violin is the devil's instrument has evolved over centuries and doesn't have a single inventor. The association can be traced back to several factors:

Ancient Greek Beliefs: Musical instruments were often linked to deities and ethical attributes. Aristotle, for instance, criticized the aulos (a wind instrument) for being too exciting.

Renaissance Period: During this time, dance and music were often associated with sinful behavior. The devil was blamed for the existence of dance, and by extension, the instruments that accompanied it, including the violin.

Niccolò Paganini: The legendary violinist Niccolò Paganini (1782-1840) was rumored to have made a pact with the devil due to his extraordinary talent. His striking appearance and virtuosity fueled these rumors.

Cultural Myths: Various cultural myths and artistic depictions have contributed to this association. For example, paintings like Pieter Brueghel's "The Triumph of Death" and Hendrik Goltzius's "Couple Playing, with Death Behind" depict the devil playing a violin-like instrument.

The combination of these factors has cemented the violin's reputation as the devil's instrument in popular culture." We here read that there was never a statement coming from the devil saying the violin belonged to him and, as with God, why would we care otherwise? A striking appearance and virtuosity is what would have 'reinforced' that: I am sorry, but that would also come from God, perhaps the description here is a bit satanized, so say glowing appearance instead. As for the art pieces, why should we allow those to exist or be around? Painting of the devil? God really does not like this sort of thing: only one God and that is Him. No art, at most books with illustrations or something, so that we see the devil's face, yet the devil has incarnated in the shape of 'my' 'father', therefore we know his shape and it has nothing to do with those. Hopefully he will still be alive and well when we get to Marcia Hope's time, so that we can interview him, since the satellite thing is already going to be on, and he is then going to tell us all and in those things we will be able to believe, at such time.

We tend to associate harps with God, though, like the praise from Psalms/bible appears associated with those. Would it then be the case that all praise should be done with the aid of harps if we sing it? Probably not. I am sure God prefers no instrument because those may come on the way to sincerity and grandiosity of the praise. A person who is creating the song as it goes or playing an instrument should not be able to think deeply about the words they are saying, yet that is a necessity for a good praise, as we saw (meaning those in my head) recently. We really need to feel the things we say, to the level of that 'knowing' of 'Jung' for it to be something Our God appreciates.

It also seems to be the case that music is for our entertainment, a gift from Our God, and the way we please Him is with actions, sacrifices and compliance instead. It seems that when the Ancient people, from Psalms, classified a praise as good, that was something to do with the music as well and their personal taste, therefore the person who is playing is then not worrying only about God, but also about the crowd that watches, what destroys the purity of the act of praise, like it is now polluted by the intentions of pleasing humans but, as 'Mother Theresa' said, it should be about us and God only.

Now, we do notice the person the YouTube refers to, in what regards reinforcement of the satanic theory, that the violin belongs to the devil, is a bit ugly, like he looks like 'Murillo', so has that enormous chin and so on, which could mean deformity or satanic looks (yet, I have never seen satan, so how can I tell if he is ugly or beautiful? At most I think black 'Nelson' is satan and he is not that ugly), yet he seems clean and tidy, even slim, and obesity does reinforce uglyness plus is satanic, since it means you overeat and do not exercise, therefore you do not take care of the house of your soul. Well, the man, according to the picture they present, is slim, actually very slim, clean and tidy in all his looks and at most he wears always black, as the presenter says, but then don't priests and Orthodox Jews also do that? We are used to be told they are holiest instead, so that black doesn't seem to mean satanic, like it is just one more color and it usually makes us become more elegant in presentation than the white color, usually associated with angels. Yet, black does close things and makes us less likely to receive good energy from the person, like it seems to block the transmission of energy from one being to another somehow and, indeed, they say the color black, in science, blocks the sun, so the light, which is usually associated with God. We also chose to dress black in funerals and we chose to say funerals are a reason for mourning instead of joy, so that it does not really make sense associating the same color to God's people. Then, once more, we have proven here that priests and Jews CANNOT be God's people and that may then match their choice of colors, finally, since God writes straight through tortuous lines. As another point, by giving him the gift of good music, God is making people stop noticing his ugly features, so say his chin, and connect to him via the sound of his soul instead and therefore he is being more blessed by God for some reason. The reason shouldn't ever be that he is demoniac, therefore we may cross that one out, please. I also observe that they have another picture of his in the beginning of the report and that one brings him wearing some white at the top, so that the claim is not even true, that he was always wearing black. The story involving the homicide is obviously not true, since we cannot even imagine how one can use intestines as strings of violin, please. Also, no human being should have the power to steal our souls: at most the devil, so the satanic system, these devices and so on. Now, it may be true that he was womanizing and drinking alcohol in excess, in case Our God could withdraw part or all of his blessing. Since they say he even played better or something, then he wasn't really womanizing or doing anything evil from that alcohol drinking habit. They invented all this, in the same way they invented the homicide. It is all satanic narrative. Then it is said that he died of cancer and refused the priest by the time of death. It might be that God punished him through the painful disease in that case, so while alive, and the priests are satanic creatures, so that refusing them should have no connection to being demoniac, like perhaps he could see beyond the established rules and that could imply even the opposite. They say his body was refused by the church and went around for a long time until 'the pope' forgave 'him'. Oh, God, what a long satanic string: a body contains no soul and therefore it makes no sense bothering about it but we decided, for hygiene and mourning purposes, to keep it intact and buried somewhere. The pope is an authority established by humans, not by God, and therefore he never had the rights to forgive the sins of anyone on earth: that is obviously only with the Lord and it is highest blasphemy to imagine they someday had this power. Shocking that these things would mean, so far, that this man was demoniac instead of most blessed. Notice, though, that you cannot get confused: the devil has been giving the essence of the original person to the usurper in some cases and that is then when God most worries about His kids, since he is protecting their history on earth in what regards at least a few things that mattered the most for us, humans, he is again using that usurper so that they still glorify the name/id of His creature, despite them being dead. We then imagine the IDs the devil preserves are those of the most gifted, most blessed by God, and those could then have their souls collected by God at that time, which was the time God decided meant completion of their cycle of evolution, more than likely, when they should then join Him and His wife in the Elohim Planet or paradise. May God bless!

Bernard Fokke: Frisian Icon, Navigator

The story of Bernard Fokke reached our ears through the YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZQrw3caM3w, and we got interested in proving that the speed involved can only have been given by God, not by the devil, this because the 'curse' involved doesn't seem to be a big deal, yet the cost of a deal with the devil is not minor: becoming a ghost and haunting people for eternity? First of all, we really do not believe ghosts, specially objects or animals associated with those coming back with them or staying here with them in the shape of a perispirit. Second, there is no suffering and pain in that and the evil person may find that even entertaining, since they live to terrorize human kind and that is then just a continuation. We then first thought of chasing the actual history of this man on earth but, as the video says, it is all satanized: the interesting thing that the devil succeeds in doing is not letting us know anything about this man apart from 'his miracle' and the deal with the devil, just like it was with Katryn Khulman, who we later found out had been usurped. That has to be part of the satanic narrative scheme. In this case, we theorized that the navigator was a top Christian, just like the original Khulman. We then tried to reach documents that had his name associated with Christianity but found nothing again. We then thought of trying his surname associated with saints: nothing again. We then thought that perhaps a study involving the place were he was born could return Christians and that one finally worked: Co-pilot then said "(I asked it: were the frisians christians?) Yes, the Frisians eventually converted to Christianity. Christianity spread to the Frisian region during the 8th and 9th centuries under the dominion of the Franks. However, it didn't completely eradicate indigenous traditions, and some pre-Christian beliefs still persisted, especially in rural areas." According to the so little they let us know about the life of this poor man, he existed on earth by the 17th century, so that his people were already Christian and therefore he also was. People don't stop to think: they even created an expression for that sort of miracle, therefore making us understand that God has given speed to a number of people along the years. They used to say frequently, in the past, 'God's speed'. His deal was obviously with God, there is no ghost ship because there are no ghosts of objects and a ship is an object, even if there is a chance there is a ghost on earth but we believe at most on apparitions, those from the Catholic church plus a bit extra, so any disincarnate spirit. We would have to investigate that during Marcia Hope, though, so through science, to get to a conclusion that we can rely on. I myself can assure you that I never had a contact with a creature which had a perispirit, like at most through humans or as an invisible (to our eye) presence. We then had a basic question, which could finally lead to a confirmation of all: who came up with the theory involving this man having a deal with the devil? We obviously expected to find a satanic on that end. What we got from Co-pilot seems to confirm all, though: "(We asked: who came up with the theory that fokke had a deal with the devil?) The theory that Captain Fokke, a legendary Dutch sea captain, made a deal with the devil is part of maritime folklore. The story is often linked to the legend of the Flying Dutchman, a ghost ship doomed to sail the oceans forever. This tale has been passed down through generations and has been popularized in various literary and artistic works. The origins of the theory are not attributed to a single individual but rather to the collective imagination and storytelling traditions of sailors and coastal communities." Imagination that is satanic generated this theory, we then conclude. May God bless with GOD'S SPEED!

Books

As I was going through the available knowledge about Jesus' and his followers, the satanic challenged me somehow, that the book was important. I said, no, the book is not important, so once more, repeated that: 'God is about here and now, not about the past'. Why would you have a God, someone above you, commanding you or interfering with your life and body? The answer is that you want miracles from them, something out of the ordinary that is going to improve your stay on earth. In this case, you need to learn the miracles that are happening right now, not in the past, and God knows that, so that He continuously feeds His followers with miracles of the type having food and clothes, where to live, health, getting a job, heal diseases, getting access to etereal knowledge/wisdom, and so on. At the moment, and throughout my life so far, all 'my followers' have access to my own head and body, to what I think, feel and experience as I am doing those things, and that is obviously a miracle and, as much as we want to say who performed this one was the devil and I never wanted this for my life, God writes straight through tortuous lines, so that everything is actually coming from Him too. God is not good, but human kind needs to believe He is, so that he split Himself into two and, whatever is not so good comes from the devil, this for as long as we need to reach the higher notes, the higher truths, which is by now. As guides, all we can do is provide recipes, as in witchery, since miracles belong to that sort of sphere, are just a bit higher in nature, since they are immersed in the Holy Ghost. Yet our recipes involve lifetime things instead of instantaneous things, such as grabbing a piece of a dirty snake and putting together with a piece of a dirty bat in a pot and cook or burn or whatever. Once you learn, you get addicted to it in the same way and one cannot ever have enough of the bread and wine of life, the bread and wine that the satanic invented Jesus said was his flesh and blood. I always thought that had to be wrong, since that sounds as if those people there were cannibal-like creatures and would literally eat human flesh and drink human blood and Jesus was saying, 'not mines, please, my flesh is THIS bread and my blood is THIS wine instead'. That is obviously ALSO coming from satanism: We have just seen, on the other post, that Baal demands sacrifices of entire human bodies. I will bet he also asks us to eat flesh and drink blood, however, you may also find that in the sumerian gods' thing or even another. The Roman officer then adds those tokens to satanize all that he can and the limits of his twisting would probably be what was known to be the truth by the Roman Empire, who were probably the only ones who could read and write and publish at that time.

Accidentally, we mentioned 'love' trying to make a comparison, but twin was probably not watching, so that I ended up misusing the word. That led to us having to define what 'love' is, since this is one of the words of the devil, which caused a lot of trouble: love, in the case of God, so what Our Lord understands as love, is compliance, as we saw that man saying on the YouTube on one of these blogs. Love, in a coupleship, means spiritual completion. Love for a relative means treating them as if they were a fellow in Christ even when they are not such. Love for human kind means sacrificing yourself in the name of positively and meaningfully contribute to human kind's existence, so that a researcher should always be told to love human kind, unless what they produce misleads, as in satanism. Love for the world is doing your best to preserve it as beautiful and nice as possible. Love for yourself is what shouldn't exist: God should love you, it is between you and Him, so that you don't love yourself, God will love you according to your deeds, behavior, sacrifices in His name, the beauty of your praise (and that has to do with feeling it in your flesh) and so on. The others will love you according to the love of God for you since the Holy Ghost will then embelish you, like you get sparkles in your eyes, a superior or more attractive aura, more beauty in your physical body, more beauty on your hair and so on. Love for your neighbor is respect and care: respect for the rules and laws while interacting with them, respect for their feelings, attention to their wants, respect for their issues, so if they tell you the music is too loud, you go and put it down immediately, since that is bothering them somehow, even if that is because they are in a bad mood, and so on. Care for when they are fainting or screaming or asking for your aid, say for things such as keeping their postal items while they travel or feeding their pet. Love for your church or workplace is helping the official carers in whatever you can, doing what they are not doing to keep the places in order, beautiful and pleasant and so on. Love for your kids is respect and care again, so never hurting their feelings, never violating them, never committing violence of any kind against them, making sure they have enough food and clothes and shoes and studies and support in life up to the age of legal majority and so on.

As another point, the beard and mustache of Jesus and his followers would have also been invented by Joseph, the Roman officer, because of the deity he adored, which should be either Baal or Yahweh but could also be someone else. We are sure that, as soon as we have God's Brainwashing going, we should be able to locate this deity/demon. A forked long beard and perhaps a long black vest will be part of the visual of this creature from hell, whoever they may be. In this case, our Jesus had a super clean face, since that has to be better for everyone who speaks to him and to attract newcomers. The followers of Jesus should be plenty, instead of only 12, so that they may have any looks they like, but perhaps majorly clean shaven if they are males. The oldest people I accompanied going to church would be those portrayed in the movies I watched when little and those usually had clean face, since that is best, so that it is simply logical to infer they were all clean shaven or almost all of them. I couldn't locate any text giving the physical appearance of the Jews back then, yet it is all satanized. There are no pictures, only paintings and drawings, and those are apparently made many years later, like the paintings involving Christ, so perhaps more than one millennia later. In this case, one can invent whatever they like about how they looked and impose that as a rule to the Jews by the time of at most Inquisition, which I think I am sure is what happened here. There seems to be no citation, also in their books (consulted Co-pilot) in what regards having a forked long beard or even having a beard, dressing long vests, which are still black, nothing. The Romans satanized all in those regards is my modest conclusion.

Hell: Fact or Fiction

Matthew 10:28, so the satanists' Bible, says "And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell." In this case, there seems to be a male figure that is able to finish with both soul and body in hell. We then go: we didn't know that we would have a body in hell. In this case, they must be referring to the perispirit instead, the case the Elohim gives to our neurons and memory. If we lose that, we must also lose the 'privilege' of living forever. https://www.facebook.com/groups/koinegreekstudygroup/posts/1339387456949857/ however brings a discussion on the Greek term that leads to the English word 'him', and that is τὸν. They say the right meaning for it is 'that which is', so that there is actually no gender associated with the assertion and it may actually refer to several devils, so also females, if we think that is the authority with those powers in hell. The word for body in Greek is σῶμα and that may also mean 'heavenly body'(https://www.billmounce.com/greek-dictionary/soma) therefore perispirit, like no other term for it in Greek. I then tried Google Translate and got the word περιπνεύμα for perispirit in Greek, yet, when I tried this word on Google using Greek and English as other terms for the search, I found nothing like that, so that the word doesn't exist in Greek and therefore the only way they could use to express such a thing is that, so heavenly body. As for the word used for 'soul' there, that is ψυχὴν, which may also mean 'life' (https://biblehub.com/greek/psuche_n_5590.htm), so that this is the meaning they intended: fear that who can destroy both perispirit and life in hell, therefore your neurons and memory plus perispirit, which means can reduce you to non-existence, to nothing.

Here I got my original words for this passage: https://biblehub.com/matthew/10-28.htm#lexicon (it is at the bottom of the page). We then understand that the authorities in hell, whoever they may be, have the power of destroying all that means your individuality, which means you may then lose your eternal life or have your permanent death through their hands.

I tried Co-pilot and got this upon asking "does the bible say that demons are fallen angels or that is inferred somehow, then how":

"Isaiah 14:12-15: This passage describes the fall of a being referred to as "Lucifer," who is often associated with Satan. It speaks of this being's pride and fall from heaven. Ezekiel 28:12-17: This passage addresses the "king of Tyre" but is often interpreted as a description of Satan's fall from grace due to his pride and rebellion. Revelation 12:7-9: This passage describes a war in heaven in which Michael and his angels fight against the dragon (interpreted as Satan) and his angels. The dragon and his angels are defeated and cast out of heaven to the earth. 2 Peter 2:4: This passage mentions that God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them into hell and delivered them into chains of darkness. Jude 1:6: This passage speaks of angels who did not keep their proper domain but left their own abode, and are reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day." We then clearly see a plethora of creatures from hell: a dragon (interpreting that as satan simply means they invented that that was satan), king of tyre (again, interpreting as satan means inventing it is when it isn't, just like it was with the variety of gods in the bible, when they reduced that to one) and Lucifer. Yet, there is still satan and the devil in the bible, so that, just like the gods, which are plenty, the Elohim society, with us simply getting one that is kind to us or give us attention, we have plenty of actors from hell. I tried Co-pilot again for this one, and asked "does the bible mention a hierarchy between satan, the devil, lucifer, the dragon and the king of tyre or we could interpret them to be all authorities in hell". It answered: "Satan: Often depicted as the primary adversary of God and the ruler of evil forces. The Devil: Another name for Satan, often used to emphasize his role as a tempter and deceiver. Lucifer: A name derived from a passage in Isaiah 14:12-15, traditionally interpreted to refer to the fall of a once-glorious angel who becomes Satan. The Dragon: Symbolically represents Satan in the Book of Revelation (e.g., Revelation 12:9). The King of Tyre: Mentioned in Ezekiel 28:12-17, often interpreted allegorically to describe Satan's pride and fall from grace." We then understand that if satan means top authority in hell, they all are such, like after we slightly desatanize their rhetoric.

I did consult Kardec on this one and got that "only a part of the devils are in Hell; the rest of them are roving about in freedom, intermeddling with all that is going on upon the Earth, and gratifying themselves by doing evil" (https://kardecpedia.com/en/study-guide/886/heaven-and-hell-or-the-divine-justice-according-to-spiritism/6803/part-first-doctrine/chapter-ix-demons/demons-according-to-the-church). In the same paragraph, it says that the devils will exist on earth until the end of times. I disagree: I am sure we can exterminate all evil through God's Brainwashing, which should be about to happen. Yet, this part of the theory, regarding them existing until the end of times, is probably not supported by conversations with spirits that Kardec had and we have to remember here that Kardec's life was also usurped.

"They are thus, at once, the cause and the chastisers of the sins of their victims, and moreover – what human jurisprudence, imperfect though it be, would never sanction – the victim who succumbs, through weakness, to the temptation which these devils contrive to throw in his way for the express purpose of leading him astray, is punished as severely as the tempter who employs his or her superior cunning and clearness in inducing the unfortunate individual to do wrong; in fact, the victim of superior cunning and malignity is punished more severely than the tempter who misled that victim, for on quitting the Earth that individual is sent straight to Hell, from which he or she will never be let out for a single minute, and where the victim is made to suffer in its fires without a moment’s relaxation of that individual’s tortures, through all time as well as through all eternity." We then understand what I also heard from YouTube reports that a time ago I could still find: that the evil doers who became evil doers for following the rhetoric of the demons will be in hell without being left out for a single fraction of second, and will suffer in its fires, tortures for eternity. It then says that the demons themselves do not get punished. That I doubt, so that that part must have been added by the satanic after usurpation. We here observe that they say those who were cajoled by them would be paying and those that cajoled wouldn't but we, in democracy, believe those that cajole should pay higher instead. Besides, we have decided that those who are bugged in the head can easily win a case at the courts if they are able to prove brainwashing is what happened to them, what we should be able to get through God's Brainwashing and interviewing the puppeteers. There are possibilities with the potentiality of the brainwashing as well. We also talked about the change in system, so that, if the person gets arrested after confessing their crimes because they are now speaking truth, they should be in jail for at most one year, since we will then change the system through Marcia Hope and just get the perpetrators recorded as criminals, returned the original name, perhaps producing an apology to society, and brainwashed/brainedited to then be put back to society.

Basically, how can we do research and find out about hell? Obviously only contacting the dead, those who are or have been there. Who has studied life after death that we know about for longer and has left books for us to read? That was Kardec or Chico Xavier, as for what the satanic let us know, like there would be a large number of sources coming from ancient times, since we do find necromancers in the bible, Old Testament, and several ancient civilizations revered the dead or sought contact with them. Both Chico's and Kardec's lives have been usurped, as we proved here, so that it is really hard. We then imagine that the satanic specialize in destroying all possible actual knowledge about life after death and the matters of the spirit, since they would like us all to sin. If you pay attention to what I am letting you know here, you will understand their 'philosophy', so what guides them in their actions on earth: the more we sin, the closer they are to God, basically, and also the farthest they are from going to hell, like it is the usurpation thing. I say, if we can prove that an extremely large number of people have usurped, and we obviously can, people are going to be way readier to accept God's Brainwashing, which is the start of a solution, and at-most-one-year prison system (brainwashing and brainediting via bug, returning the name to the original people and whatever else society deems adequate, so say publishing a letter somewhere showing sincere repentance and will to repair human kind). The satanic then thinks: if hell gets everyone, God may change His mind, so come up with less strict rules or punishment, and perhaps find a way of having a sort of amnesty or something. I am tired of having sources disappearing on the World Wide Web as they please. May God help me and see if I can find even one survivor of a true medium's report somewhere, where they talk about at least one of the so many cases I heard about in the past, of people who have experienced hell for real, not in NDE. I also think that the right theory is that there is no spiritual experience during an NDE, since the researcher we mentioned here, Leinha let me know, found nothing for a few years and I felt nothing as I went through at least 3 NDE, having trying suicide three times through pills during this time. The Elohim obviously know the difference between an NDE and an actual death, if nothing else, like we cannot ever deceive them because, as said before, the Holy Ghost is inside of us all all the time and works like a CIA, from the time it was managed by originals, from heavens.

https://bibliotecacatolica.com.br/blog/sem-categoria/carta-de-uma-alma-condenada-ao-inferno/?srsltid=AfmBOoqzH9h7SQwbNMFmq_lSTSmsiY-3EpUw1thgIwohamyVCw5_jbnf, here we see a letter received by a Catholic nun, which was recovered after her death. A young woman she knew, called Ani, would have passed these contents to her while the nun was alive. It is in Portuguese, but I do agree that that is a description of hell, with me now believing I also had a quick glance of it at a certain stage of my life and it does coincide with large part of what it is in this letter. Scientific details are that we don't have not even the full name of the nun or of the woman or the location or the dates involved, so that this evidence is very weak, yet there is very little they let me have access to and it is kinda miracle I found this letter, so that I will talk about pieces of it that coincide with my own experience and intuition (Add 'she says that' to the beginning of every item, please):

1) Everyone hates each other ('Odiamo-nos mutuamente') and they also hate God ('Mais do que tudo, odiamos a Deus')

2) They don't love anymore ('Aqui nao amamos a ninguem mais')

3) They don't acknowledge good on anyone else ('Nos aqui nao reconhecemos bem algum em ninguem')

4) They stare, in shock, at their failed lives, howling and grinding our teeth, tormented and full of hate ('Fitamos, estarrecidos, a nossa vida falhada, uivando e rangendo os dentes, atormentados e cheios de odio')

5) All in hell think in the same way ('Pensamos todos da mesma forma'). Our will is petrified on evil ('A nossa vontade esta petrificada no mal') even when we do something good ('mesmo quando fazemos algo de bem'). As me now ('como eu agora'). We don't do good with good intentions ('Nao o fazemos com boa intencao').

6) All recollections show us that terrifying side of that being a grace that we despised. ('E todas essas lembrancas nos mostram aquele medonho lado que fora uma graca que desprezamos'). How this torment us! ('Como isso atormenta!')

7) We don't eat, we don't sleep and even less do we walk with our legs. ('Nao comemos, nao dormimos, nem andamos com as pernas')

http://crimeinthe21stcentury.blogspot.com/2025/01/jorge-lafond-brazilian-icon-tv.html brings a supposedly psychographed letter about hell, but also proof that this guy had been usurped and therefore this could never be his psychographed letter, therefore hell is not such, the misinformation campaign of satan...

https://www.amazon.com.au/Letters-Hell-C-Kollmyer/dp/1163846384 claims to bring some letters from hell with descriptions. It says 2010, which should mean sure falsehoods, since the marginal would have manipulated everything involved through the bugs and others, but the description of the book seems to state that it is a reprint, therefore maybe the original was old enough (should be from before 1880 to be something we can trust). It took me a lifetime to find this book and I had to then use the terms psychographed letter hell but I had tried a lot of other terms before that with no success, like perhaps the marginal cannot guess certain words that are present in the description of the works we look for and we then can sometimes win this race, but, without God's Brainwashing, we get nowhere, as said.

If the marginal had not satanized everything, we obviously would have become aware of many communications from the dead mentioning usurpation and apologizing for that. It is all truly satanized.

I dug and found the original letter, which we talked about earlier on here, which belonged from a Sister Claire from Germany: https://www.theworkofgod.org/Library/catholic/letter_from_hell.htm We now get a location and 2 first names, which is better than nothing. We then also get more details about their lives, like, provided we can uniquely identify this 'Claire', we are then able to get to the full name of the young woman. Still missing dates, precise addresses and so on. I also found it here: https://www.traditioninaction.org/religious/e003rp.LetterBeyond1.htm

"ROMANS 2:6-10,12 God “will give to each person according to what he has done.” (7) To those who by persistence in doing good, seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. (8) But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger. (9) There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil: first for the Jew, then for the gentile; (10) but glory, honor and peace for everyone who does good: first for the Jew, then for the gentile…(12) All who sin apart from the law will also perish apart from the law." (https://www.hellhadesafterlife.com/hell-know/what-bible-says-about-hell). We then understand that there is hell and that will be trouble and distress, wrath and anger, which matches the description of hell that the nun mentioned above received.So, hell, according to the satanic bible, is what you see in the just-mentioned link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUKisMev1XI brings a first person report on how hell feels like. He says it is as if your flesh is being ripped over and over gain, worst pain he ever felt in life. That he didn't know if it was ever gonna end. Terrible pain, agonizing thoughts. Misleading information, voices: that Jesus and God wanted that to happen to him.

Jung: I Know God

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEExxtdc0fU, Jung says he doesn't need to believe, since he knows God. It is quite interesting and deep coming from a usurper. He would have said, "The knowledge of god means a condition of inner integration, blessedness, wisdom, harmony with oneself and all nature that our psyches are pursuing all our lives." I have never heard something as interesting and deep as this: it does explain the feeling those who really had an experience with God feel.

ζωὴν: A Word of Difference

One of the last YouTubes we mentioned here quoted a biblical passage from the book of John (5:26): "For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself." That is a fundamental passage for us to understand the satanic bible's view on the soul: if God Himself has a soul. This because there was obviously mistranslation there. Now, the word from the Greek that got translated into 'life in' is ζωὴν, and, while the first two letters in it mean 'to live' or 'life', according to most sources, the last two mean 'imperfect indicative for a subject that might be he, she or it', as for the best source we found (we need to know if that is indicative present, past or future, on top of all, but the source doesn't say that).

I now theorize that what is meant is that God has a 'she in' or a she inside of Him, therefore He is one flesh with a particular she and therefore His son also has a 'she in' or a particular she inside of him. What that means is that, without the wife, they cannot tell us what is right in a perfect manner, that then being why Jesus goes to Egypt and marries first, to only then tell us The Word. As said before, God also has His Goddess and, while the hes should need their shes to be able to tell The Word, the shes should be able to tell it even without the hes (not considering or telling how painful their journey is then, so if on their own).

The sources that teach us Greek to the needed level - and in a non-satanic way - are inexistent, just like it was with Hebrew before, so in 2001. I then asked 'Trevor' for researchers to put some work into that and they did: they came up with things such as Biblehub and Bibleglot. It is impossible to believe how human kind is given to make things impossible to themselves and also to subject itself to manipulation by others, therefore allowing for their only opportunity in the current body in this world to be literally used by others instead of themselves. I still cannot believe how long it took human kind (and that happened only thanks to me, as far as I know, so that is 2001 years only for those TWO institutions) to simply start challenging the teachings, writings and practices of the Catholic Church and Islam in a meaningful manner, like it was always obvious that they were not even given authority to do what they did by anyone who matters or who should be involved in the position of 'only one'. Shocking.

Notice that I found out, thanks exclusively to Mr. Devil, 'Braganca', 'my father', that a word in Aramaic usually had 6 different world references, thanks to the book of the usurped (more than likely) he kept with himself, like a single book ever, which 'finally' taught us 'right Aramaic'. I now wonder how many meanings can a 4-letter word from the Greek Language have. As I keep on saying, God does not have any mercy, who has mercy is Jesus only. Please pray for human kind as well, not only us, the twins of God. May God bless!

Unholy Trinity: More Proof

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGCtsJvh0bQ, this presenter/researcher tells us about 5 other ways (we have already presented some strong argumentation here) to prove that God, Jesus and the Holy Ghost are three instead of one, thanks God, may God be praised.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25pMJpvrqN8, this presenter/thinker tells us about other 2 ways in which we can prove that Jesus was not God. May God bless!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLOTxFCIY4I, this presenter/thinking tells us about the bible and a few other ways to prove that Jesus is not God. Only one of the passages he presents seems to still be passive, after his analysis, of supporting that Jesus is God. Yet he talks about many others that prove that Jesus isn't God. Besides, we have already proven that the bible is not the word of God, so that it doesn't really matter that he misses the point on one of his analyses. May God bless!

Jesus Christ!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQWoQFtxYsM, this counsellor talks about Near Death Experiences. She has done research into that for about 30 years. She then found out that it is very common that people report seeing relatives and tunnels. Very few report seeing Jesus but their description of Jesus varies. I was then transported to the time I had an experience that, were it not my scientific mind, should be reported as contact with Christ The Consolator. I arrived home, and I was then living at Rua Vinte e Quatro de Maio, 235, in Rocha, Rio de Janeiro, and I went to bed, which I never did, like I usually would eat, have a shower and others before going to bed but that day I went straight to bed. I then felt that I was on the lap of a male whose looks could be that of Jesus but I wasn't thinking of anything, just living the moment. I then felt him caressing my hair and all was really real. He caressed me for some amount of time that I cannot describe, yet, when I disconnected from him, I was filled, like I felt as if all my solitude and pain were over, like as if I had always been with him. I now was put to think about the scene, which I never shared with anyone else, just because I am into all these things now, including proving that miracles are farce, crime of the marginal, and I then tried to prove to myself that the marginal had created all that for me. Yet, it would be very unlikely, since the marginal even calls himself devil and seems to destroy everything that is actual proof of anything that matters in the spiritual realm. I then remembered that all these years, so more than 20, I have been attacked by plenty inside of my head in extremely different ways and a huge variety of people, with very different capabilities in crime and in real life, like what means life, yet not even 'Tom', who entered my head with car and huge splash at a certain stage, when I was at the public library, had managed to create that sensation, of something so real and as if I were inside of the scene where they are. It was a very different sensation: I felt as if there were no limits between 'my' 'space' in that apartment and his space, over that grass (like I don't remember very well if this is the scene, just seems that it is), which was normal grass, but perfect in the sense that it was all even everywhere and of uniform color and there were absolutely no traces of any garbage or animal or insect or anything else. The sky was also uniform and did present any movement, like the grass. Perhaps there were some trees at his back, which I could never see in their entirety. He was dressing normal clothes, which is the reason as to why, back then, I got the impression someone like from CIA or something had put that together for me, like after it passed. He was like the Christ from Isaiah, like he didn't make us desire him, and he also passes no lust or desire himself, not like a normal person because his hair, I now realize, was perfectly in place, as if it were impossible that a single string broke or got folded somehow else. His hair was by the shoulders and dark, also with waves, waves that were not tiring or equally spaced yet it suited his face to perfection. His body was slim and not of any color that is seen on bodies, almost white, but not our white, definitely not caucasian. His eyes were dark but not super black so perhaps brown. I could not see a different color in the eye, as if it were all the same. His face was perfect, like skinwise and shape. The shape was, by no means, round. It was not too slim either. It had perfect distribution of widths all along it. Only when I disconnected from him, with me not knowing how, but feeling all that as natural, he seemed to raise from a kanga that was of a single color, sitting over the grass. This because I then saw him standing. Yet I never saw him actually raising from it and I also cannot confirm that he was ever sitting on it, like his body did not seem to have the necessary physical configuration for someone who is sitting, like I didn't feel that his legs were extended or coiled at any stage. He then left the area I could see after staying there for a while as if seeing if I could accept that he left. I then now thought: definitely a studio thing. Yet the green looked as real as the cloth as real as him and I felt that I was 'in it' with him, like, all of a sudden, there were no dimensions. All was inside of my head, like now, yet now I know it is inside, I see it inside, but, back then, there were no limits, I didn't see my face, for instance, as I do now, and I then realize the marginal could not have had such a technology because otherwise they would have subjected me to that at a certain stage, since 'Tom', for instance, appears as loving figure and we did interact to the physical level in this thing. Could CIA and Pentagon have developed secret technology or the Elohim always had it? I don't know. Yet, now, after going through all these things, it does look finally like it was Christ. The end was also extremely interesting, since I got the knowledge not in the heart, not in the brain and not even in the spirit, some other level, think also not Holy Ghost, to be sincere, that that was Christ the Consolator. I now remember they say, about the apparitions of Mary, that each one has a name, so Our Lady of Perpetual Help, Our Lady of Consolation and Our Lady of Sorrows, for instance, and I then notice that the counsellor tells us about one patient who had NDE and said that an aide came to ask her what shape she wanted for Jesus, that he could come in any shape she wanted. I then now put that all together and come up with Christ the Consolator, Christ the Redeemer and Christ the Judge, as three of the possible appearances of Christ when seeing us in this world. As said before, we get a perispirit after death and we can then appear in any way we like to the living, we conclude. I now think that was paradise, since I recently got to the conclusion paradise is indeed a physical place, the Elohim Planet, and there all things are the most perfect they can be, so that it does make sense a grass that is completely uniform also in color and has absolutely no trace of dirt or anything that disrupts the idea of infinite harmony. I further observe that the kanga had no mark of his body as he supposedly raised, like I saw it after he appeared standing and there was absolutely no impact of his presence on it plus it was again perfectly even in color and all else. It was of a rectangular shape. Another interesting detail, which makes us be surer that that was for real, not the marginal or even the other side of the story, so compliance, a hero that watches, is that I got the words in English, Christ the Consolator, yet I was in Brazil and the marginal did everything they could to completely erase my English. At that stage, I had concluded my English course, but I had never heard the word 'consolator' before, during any part of my studies that far. Also, those inside of me right now accompanied even my doubt as to whether that was right English. I typed it in Copilot and it gave me consoler, so that I thought I had the wrong term and they all saw this. For some reason, I decide to insist and consult the dictionary, where I finally found exactly consolator. I don't know when exactly that happened, since I have no timeline, but I am reckoning it was after I studied the Bible for one year or at least after my experience with my twin through 'Rogerio'. I now realize I had quite a few experiences there. Only with God's Brainwashing for us to dig more there, since we need to recover my original body, in case this is not it, and my original memories and be able to show those in 3D as they do inside of my head so that you all see and can feel what I felt or something, see what I saw and so on. I now theorize that the discrepancies in the paintings describing the physicality of Christ are due to the fact that he presents himself in several different physical shapes when making contact with us and maybe that image, which most impressed me, of a blonde blue-eyed golden-haired white, but not caucasian, Jesus could be Christ the Redeemer or something. His looks were those of someone who could easily be those of someone who is 33 yo, the age he had when he died on earth.

When I was watching this YouTube and I heard that people would see tunnels when they were dying but the tunnels varied in terms of colors and one would be with bright light around and brighter light in the end while the other would be colored with a bright light in the end, I remembered our best guess on how things go after the death of the physical body: that the Elohim Planet sends a device through the Holy Ghost and this device has something that attracts the soul to it, so, something similar to what we have in Physics, so one object that is positively charged attracting another object that is negatively charged, and they send that through a process that is similar to teleportation, this as soon as the death of the physical body is noticed by the Holy Ghost. It is just that all this, so Holy Ghost and device, would be invisible to the human eye. Yet, in those studies, people actually saw tunnels. Then we can say they saw those with the eyes of the soul, I suppose.

Notwithstanding, last night, before I went to bed, God sent the reveleation once more: Leinha actually spoke to me about the tunnels. She asked me about how she could 'paint' those tunnels (she would have explained that someone managed to create those, so that it is definitely not her the person who creates, and it is probably some computer experts), basically, so that people would realize it was not what they were thinking. I now realize it was about this: she talked about a researcher who was studying things and not getting a result for many years, that she wanted to help her. I now know it was this one, so that, if one wants to confirm, since I have never spoken to this woman in life, they can simply ask her if she was demotivated in the initial years of her research because she found nothing, which is the narrative Leinha gave me. Well, in this case, Leinha would have 'helped' (satanic ways, of course) her: she then would have inserted all images the patients describe in their heads during those NDEs. In this case, of course, all patients were 'super bugged' and so was the researcher (so that she would know the researcher was finding nothing). In this case, Jesus is not that: that is the devil. They were using that to 'prepare us' for their take over, so when they had usurped all Elohim and would appear as 'our Jesus' (notice that leading us to heavens is not really a role ascribed to Jesus in the Bible, so that we are not really supposed to expect him to play such a role): so that we would think that is a good thing, those are 'holy' beings and we would then trust them, go to wherever they take us, like they had no way to guess if such step, the 'leading you there', was a necessary thing or not, since I assume that, at least that far, they had not yet usurped the Elohim, so that they are there betting on the possibility. Once more, there will only be true research after we have God's Brainwashing. Of course, 'Janice' could also be a usurper, in case she could have told Leinha that in person, so maybe Leinha got it from her directly. Those that she 'helps' are usually those who spoke to her directly, like me, so that I am actually assuming Janice spoke to her in person. As another point, I now also remember Leinha asking me about how Jesus looked like. I said, 'I don't know', 'why?', 'how do you think he looks like?' She would then become serious again, shut face, and ask me if I believed Jesus would appear to us as we die, not sure here, perhaps I am inventing part of this dialogue, and I said, 'I don't think so', she then said, 'well, if he is the one to appear to us after death, how would he look like'. I then said, 'I don't know'. She said, 'if that is true, however', how could he be doing that, like would he have a physical shape, and I then said, 'he would ask us what shape we would like him to appear in' before appearing. She then said she was going to introduce a male as the figure to ask us that in order to prepare us for what was about to come. That is just to say that the marginal worries about this sort of thing to maximum, so that Leinha would have kept an eye on all those cases to see if there was something, just like the researcher.

The intuition is correct, Janice was also usurped: https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=2489372fa4accccc&sxsrf=ADLYWIJOxOah_EXopOmRBLHtoT6cjDldkg:1736976290021&q=%22janice+holden%22+pictures+counsellor&udm=2&source=univ&fir=i2ycuyw29sfMJM%252Cuwr6hyrhig7gYM%252C_%253B7SIg_wWjATPITM%252CxfwbYcsvkLCEAM%252C_%253BI772DLSohg3mFM%252C1Cy1jBFQ5_SWBM%252C_%253B-zTK-7_NPjexNM%252Cu7gUebc9OCAh3M%252C_%253BqDhO7iTBRx-ECM%252Cuwr6hyrhig7gYM%252C_%253B3kC39N5IJZuTZM%252Ccv-zr-KwHJA-cM%252C_%253B4Cay_WzafuFB4M%252Cuwr6hyrhig7gYM%252C_%253BCZXoc2yOSIzE5M%252CPoyljvuIKjZLvM%252C_%253BpVT8ev-GNb2SFM%252CPCdMPqn7R1yfvM%252C_&usg=AI4_-kTXIh6f4kAGk-OU6Ifb3UTAWR8UJA&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjp2P_11PiKAxUtxzgGHRzqJwkQ7Al6BAgPEAY&biw=1366&bih=651&dpr=1#vhid=CZXoc2yOSIzE5M&vssid=mosaic. The difference between images is very subtle, but please observe the nose in detail, I actually needed the magnifier for this one: 1st row, columns 1 and 2, compare with 2nd row, 3rd column. It is three different women! The secret to tell one from the other is the detail of the tip of the nose. In this case, I think we can infer that Leinha only 'helps' those who figure as usurper and speak to her in person. The detail is also that she put the image of one of her Jesus to appear to me during my sleep, so that that probably happened at the same time that they were inserting those images in the head of the NDE's patients, so immediately after 'their thing' was ready. Even though I had studied in Catholic establishments during my entire life, I was living in Rocha by the time she shared that with me and I had no feelings for Christ, like, as far as I was concerned, he either wasn't important or had never existed, like the nuns had taught me nothing about him. As said before, the nuns from the college, in Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro, were all usurpers.

I now also remember Leinha asking me about how CIA could show they cared about me, in other words, now I know, like I cannot really describe the 'codes' she used to ask me about these things, but that was the meaning. I then suggested that, exactly what they did, with 'their Jesus', so that I am now sure that was all inserted by the marginal and 'CIA' has got the technology to provoke those sensations: the communication was not really happening via heart, soul, or Holy Ghost, however it must then have happened in the brain somewhere, somewhere that is not perceived by our awareness/consciousness. They then managed to create yet another dimension of imaging and interaction, something that humans would usually attribute to ETs, I now believe. 'CIA' is then being used for that sort of thing, I now think: they pretend to be ETs, so already taking the place of the Holy Ghost in their Elohim drama. It is weird, though: they would have to do all that extra-officially, so how? I now then also think about the device and the universities where they originate and are maybe manufactured all the time: how do they manage to keep everything extra-official and still use the resources of the organizations they work for, I wonder? It is certainly a mystery. Yet, the marginal could here be referring to their 'own CIA', so the satanic one, meaning they would have assembled such a thing and 'work' from there. With this, all apparitions, weird things happening in the skies, including spaceship sights and statues, are all tricks of the satanic and we should realistically have only this chance, of Rio de Janeiro doing things right before or on the 19th, so playing the hero of earth, which coincides with 'my story', of having 'chosen' the carioca prostitutes to go with, like as 'a team'. Notice that even though Leinha only 'helps' those she speaks to, she was clearly letting me know the other marginals were already doing that sort of thing, so that those don't really speak to anyone, just act, so they just use the bugs as they please to create their narratives, so to inflict pain, suffering, loss and injury on human kind. The marginal tries to tell me that we don't have any more chances and I should then 'go with daddy', 'daddy cool (as they invented, the song)', so come back to 'their nest', like it is all taken by them and the unbugged plus Christian ones don't really have a chance of ever recovering earth. CIA had put one more YouTube for me to watch, so one more agent to be our possible chance, I again didn't click in time, even though I reserved the video for Today by entering it and therefore including it in my YouTube history, and they then deleted my history item, and they have done that a couple of times now, like I almost didn't find the video where the face of Jesus, as calculated by Science, was yesterday, despite having adopted the same strategy (so, accessing it quickly in order to put it in my history, for me to be able to just go to the YouTube history and find it again next day). I then tried to do the same I did yesterday to find the other video, the one with the 'scientific' face of Jesus, which is using Google and entering what I know about it, then I typed '500 eyewitnesses ressurection' and I was able to find it. Then the marginal observed me from inside, as they always do, and they saw me still finding it, so that, today, when I tried to use the same strategy to find the CIA video, I couldn't, like it didn't work anymore, unfortunately, like they are really quick at adapting and 'fixing'. Yet I tell all the time to my team what they have to do immediately and, if we are losing so far, it is just because people either take too long to act or don't act at all, as in the case with the satellite. Our chances are really almost null, it was a miracle that God gave me the satellite solution. There can't be any divisions, so, for instance, after we decided my name will be there as exception, together with the name of the person who will effectively do the brainwashing, nobody should or could come up with, why not me, since that will only create confusion and make us not act immediately plus make us retrocede in time. The marginal doesn't suffer from these problems and that is yet another reason as to why they advance so quickly also literally over (and inside) our heads. With this, we know once more that they control and manage absolutely all human IT, including that of elections, which is yet another means they use to guarantee we have nothing in practice, so no democracy either, like our vote doesn't count, the government or management is always who they choose via usurpation or IT manipulation or another method. Notice that you had never realized not even that 'Tom Cruise' had multiples (yet, now you can probably notice how different those are from each other) before I tell you that here, so that you wouldn't be able to guess how they commit their crimes either, specially those from IT, such a specialized field: this Australian male told me he guaranteed, like to the point of putting his life on the row, that the elections in Australia were 100% honest, that he worked with that and they had several check points, with different people and all. Well, they then simply usurp, as we can easily prove.

I also observe that the American 'Obama', as I keep on telling you, is the boss of Hezbollah, yet another terrorist/satanic group, and he then never leaves my head (his multiples), also in image, trying to not only control everything all the time to maximum, but also trying to tell whoever accesses the device, that he is trusted by me (since I don't attack him inside or his image (now I do, since I did realize that in time). The devil is 'my father', so that he is already approaching and doing yet another story, which was 'my story' in case we fail badly, last night, which means he is sure that 'Obama' and 'Trump' and 'Musk' and Hollywood will never change and therefore will never save us from anything and that is probably what those with me are thinking, given the speed of their compliance with what I say that should be done: that they will help or do their share in the end. What that means, in practice, is that, in the end, we probably wouldn't have not even Forever Young, since that implies disclosure of one of their main weapons, main tool of injury, the head device, as well as the end of at least two of the main lies currently in Science, which is that we don't have an orifice in the ear drum and if the CT scan doesn't show, then there is no device in our head. Besides, once more notice that if we don't get Rio/cariocas to publish about their crimes against human kind until the 19th and call police and all else, even if we did get Forever Young (what is now highly unlikely, to the rate of 99%), so the USA publishing about that, which would also imply telling the world I am bugged in my head and they knew all since at most 2003, so at least about the third bug, we wouldn't get any benefit or reversion that goes beyond rejuvenation through the bug, so end of our dreams of finishing with jail and mental system, for instance. Here notice that the marginal has, as part of their rhetoric, that they really wish for those to finish, so jail and mental hospitals, but they actually don't, since that is highly useful for their crimes, like their existence: they can then recruit people even without bugging their heads first, like everyone would like to not be in those places specially in Rio, where prison is the same as suffering all violation of human rights one can suffer (prisoners accumulate in a jail cell and here, as we know, even having more than one person per cell is already absurd, since the cell is like a bedroom, so no living room, no bathroom, no nothing, all absurd). The marginal still frequently worsens up the conditions in those environments, such as when they impose electroshock in Australia claiming it is useful for at least depression in Science (yet they use it for other illnesses in practice and it is scientifically proven that it is good for nothing in mental illness; just harmful, as said before), to maximum they can, specially where they have largest amount of interest, where they get 'best' marginals, as in Rio. They run politics, so that they by no means would invest money in places like Rio to fix the system, for instance. Any project to improve anything would be vetoed, etc. However, notice that we do precisely the opposite: we not only embrace the rhetoric of the marginal, in whatever is possible/makes sense, so we do indeed want to finish with those, but we will act accordingly: we have proposals and will definitely put those in practice for that end. That is the difference between God and the devil/satan, please: we don't lie, deceive or cheat. What you see (even from inside) is indeed what you get. Hold our hand now before it is too late, please.

I also would like to report that, even though I proposed that 'Nelson' accompanied me as I went through NDE after trying suicide in Florianopolis, so that he would tell me, in the end, what happened, I myself don't think I experienced anything special, so that near death is definitely not the same as death, if nothing else. Also, as another point, I would like to say that it is then very likely that the other illusion, of the Louvre hooded and half-sacred creatures, was also inserted by Leinha/her associates, and, in this way, also the other illusion, involving spaceship and ET (where the 'ET' would have asked me what face I wanted him to have and I said 'Tom Cruise's', when the 'thing' that approached me was ugly and sexually repulsive and they claimed to wish for having sex with me, and the spaceship came to my window in Rocha), would have been theirs, in this case. Yet, I do have some good news for you: the most recent experience, involving the communication through the Holy Ghost, would have finally come from Our God, thanks to me and twin doing things as one, as explained before, so that we now have learned that Our God will communicate with us and do us favors or tell us that He won't if we follow a certain recipe, which involves pure heart, clean soul, fasting, etc., plus a great praise. We now realize that the reason as to why we have not received genuine communications from God for a lifetime in human kind is that we are not praising Him the way He likes to be praised, which is proving that our mind is in syncronicity with heavens, so that we don't ever say things such as 'I praise you, my Lord': we become the own praise, like we say 'All you have created on earth is greatest, my Lord, your love for us is everywhere, in the little birds that sing for me in the morning, filling my spirit with joy because of their tabs being so delicate and reaching heavens' instead, it is like we demonstrate, through words and deep reflection/correct contemplation, that we really mean the words we say, like we said 'filling my spirit with joy', but we then need to explain how the singing of the birds would do that, like it is like a PhD thesis, where you have to really detail the experience in order to prove you have truly incorporated the learning, rather than just saying something, in a generic way, which could imply repetition, like you just saw somewhere else and copied, without really deepening your mind and spirit into that wonder of the contemplation of true wisdom/knowledge. It is perhaps hard to explain and that is perhaps why I have a few people accompanying me inside, so that, like the apostles, they can supplement my explanation with words on how it feels and is. That is so that others may learn how to do that themselves, and therefore how to get the same results. Anyway, we now are sure Our God does exist, what is awesome. However, I was wrong about 'giving our lives to Christ'. Even though we can say 'in the name of Christ', we don't really need or should give our lives to him (only now do I realize I have never done that myself, just said it (my twin would have 'fixed' me by the time I were saying that if we were together as one, but we weren't, so that at least sometimes I take a bit longer or something until I get the right instruction from God, Our Lord), for some reason, so that we don't really have to give our lives to anything or anyone, since Our Lord gives us our lives for us to enjoy them). Praise the Lord!

I also now remember that yesterday night we had yet other men coming around this building, where I am, and staying in the garage (once more, as for what I perceive, like it might be all illusion generated via head). I got the immediate word coming to me, that he was the devil, not sure how, but have the feeling that it wasn't really mine. The devil is 'my father', so that it couldn't be that man. Basically, I felt as if they were bad (I had the impression that they were two), but not horribly bad, like not like the spiked woman, yet that idea, of devil, came to me via emanation of some sort. They (those inside of me) then said they were cops, but not good ones. I now remember 'my' story: if I said that, that I knew cops and could then tell if those around me were them or not, they would then put some bad ones for us to teach whomever was inside that bad ones also exist, so already along the lines of making us unlearn the so satanic universals and absolutes, like things do not seem to deviate much from what came from God and through me back then. The marginal says that if I can conceive evil in my head in image, in full, then it happens, so that, I would like to say you have to conceive good in the same way and for the same purpose, the image of the good result, God's result, has to be fully formed in your mind, since those are what you imprint in the Holy Ghost, as what should become and, if God is with you, it shall indeed be done, like provided you make maximum effort for that to be achieved. May God bless!

I now can tell the reason as to why those 'bad' cops appeared, since I now remember what happened: this woman, sounding like a native Australian one, said something to my head, which was 'hey', in a half-catacombic way, and I then had the feeling she could be coming to usurp me. At that stage, 'Obama' moved in my head to where 'she was' (when I wasn't really seeing her inside of my head, just hearing that far) and spoke to her, which was then to imply that he was saving me, I now think, even though I now assume it is all deceit of his, and I then still feared. Yet only today did I remember: I had asked the Australian native women to do that if they thought we needed help for cariocas to drop the device, like those attacking via voice and image for so long, so that they were actually helping as well, just pretending. Life is so hard! Yet one thing struck me: there was daylight where the supposed woman appeared to converse with 'Obama', so where she would be walking to come to get me, but here it was night time, so no light. I then get more confused. May God bless!