Split Brain Problem: One Side is Atheist, The Other is a Believer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFJPtVRlI64 brings the following problem: a biological phenomenon took place and the brain of a certain person was split into half, both hemispheres creating their own consciousness. They then asked to one side if they believed in God, they said no. They asked to the other side, they said yes. In this case, is this person going to hell or heavens?

That is a good question, even though simply believing in God is not enough to qualify for heavens but it is obviously one of the requirements. Well, if that were a problem for the subject, they obviously wouldn't be able to say yes or no when asked that question from outside of their body. Yet the researcher says that his answer, from outside of the body, was a 'no', therefore they don't believe God is their internal conclusion. God does not seem to consider or judge our inner thinking, different from the devil: God considers our actions, more than anything else, like if you simply believe in God but don't do anything with that, so don't praise, don't pray, don't spread the word, don't do good, don't comply with His instructions, then you obviously don't go to heavens, like simply thinking means nothing. Now, verbalizing might mean something because you could be influencing someone else. In his example, he says the verbalization is 'no, I don't believe God', despite his confusion in the end of the video. That means no heavens for them, since that will influence others negatively in what regards Our God. Now, I do have a problem with this narrative: I can easily detect flaws. It is obvious to me that the person DOES NOT have full consciousness in each one of the sides because they are able to get to an agreement and utter a 'no', only one answer, with no mistake. If they had equal amount of consciousness in each one of the sides, they would be confused, obviously and trivially, like they could say a yes followed by a no, say nothing or whatever that meant confusion. I am sorry, but that is wrong science and I do suspect that non-believers will always commit some type of mistake in their research, quite sincerely.

I got to the conclusion that the researcher is a non-believer because we observe that he talks about the person preferring blondes or brunettes and that is satanic thinking, since, in that way, we see people as physicality only or first, yet we should see them with the eyes of the soul if we look for a God's coupleship, which is what everyone should be aiming at. I would think he is an atheist.