In this case, God loved dinosaurs, who were royalty on earth, and hated us, who were then the lowest servants of all. Yet, our bodies are exactly the same as the Elohim's, therefore they don't like themselves or something? They created a parallel world where they suffer instead of being royalty? Then they are going to say that one day for God is equivalent to millions of years for us, so that, when it is written that God created earth on the first day of creation, that was year one, but, when God created human kind, that was something like one million years ago. Yet we can then say that the day, night, water and vegetables all co-existed with the dinosaurs, what makes day 1 of creation be the same day as the day of creation of those, so as day 2 and day 3. We have then just proven that the days of God would be hours of ours or something, thus the exact opposite to what was alledged.
I do believe all existed at the same time, though, and humans were indeed food for a long time, so creatures as any other animal on earth: rights to almost nothing, like lucky if you ever get your food without being injured or killed by a bigger or stronger/more violent animal.
Now we understand, if believing Genesis, and thinking with logic, that we must actually have been created before the time of the dinosaurs, since we would have been created soon after there was night and day, vegetables and so on. Co-pilot, from Microsoft, says that earth existed long time before the dinosaurs: It dates from about 4.5 billion of years ago. In this case, we were there too, that is, Genesis would have happened about 4.5 billion of years ago. The problem with this account is that there could be no writing that survived, given the amount of natural catastrophes, which even finished with the era of the dinosaurs, catastrophes the world experienced. In this case, once more, there can't be any Genesis or Bible that can be trusted in anything, there cannot be such a thing as a 'holy book': it is just a book, so that we can spit over it, step over it and so on. It is an object like any other and objects would be the same as idols if adored or considered holy therefore one of the worst sins according to our God. Once more, the God of the Jews, therefore of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, does not rely on books at all: it is all about the now, what is being said and done right now.
Some things in the Bible can still be used as a reference, probably what is least tampered with by those men, those who rejected the most basic function of their genitalia (obviously making oneness with their wives in a more special way, trying to reach heavens through that), who voluntarily chose to kill part of their bodies while alive and, to make it worse, the most blasphemious ever, for they married Jesus is what we hear. Once more, you can't marry God and Jesus is God. God is not interested in that. He has His Godess, first of all: it is just the terrorists of that time, therefore the satanic, shaping all on earth according to their beliefs instead of doing what they declared to be doing, therefore something holy. If you cannot even use the name of God in vain, as they themselves say, how can you disrespect Him to such an extent: Jesus is God is what they say. He doesn't even count in the absurd marriage, He can't say a word. Yet, according to the same men, He would have refused to properly marry Mary Madaglene, a woman who was even seen as prostitute back then, so that of the type that goes with anyone, like she would never refuse his sexuality. It was the right gender, at least, as determined by God when He created us, as for their liturgy. Co-pilot says the priests from the Catholic Church do not marry Jesus, though, like this is something that only the nuns do: they marry the Church. The Church should be all of us, who are Catholic, and I also am sure that it is a global preference that a man's minimum social utility be marriage, so at least making one woman happy, and therefore the Church ALSO did not ever support their celibacy even though the Church could agree with having women who cannot have sex marrying those men, I suppose, so say a paraplegic, like some of us would have problems like that and would certainly benefit from a husband of that type.
It is worth mentioning that if there were any chance the stories of the Bible were true, all those people, including Jesus, would have lived billions of years ago, since the stories go in sucession, from father to kids, with no gaps, yet we say we are in 2025 now, so how would that ever be possible?
I suppose that ruins the entire Old Testament, which makes sense to me, since it has nothing in common with the new Testament. The New Testament would be what Christians should believe and follow, since that is supposed to be the life of Christ. Yet, it was put together by the same type of terrorists and therefore can only suffer from the same problems. The most basic problem I have with the New Testament is that Jesus would have frontally opposed several strong instructions of His father, such as that the body of the husband belongs to the wife and vice-versa. He goes there and splits 12 men from their wives and children and takes them to the desert. We are never told why that should or could be done and nobody in all the Christian churches I have been is able to provide a single explanation as to why that is acceptable. I came to the conclusion that, if God created us, something could still be of use in the Bible, and that God could still be that of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (however their lives were never those in the Bible in that case), yet He would be one of the Elohim and had a wife and so on. If we introduce the wife, the Goddess, then we can certainly come up with a theory as to why ALSO Jesus would PREFER men to women, which is what I previously said, the Goddess does not trust earthly women enough yet and proposes challenges as tests to try to include us so that she is not overshadowed or commanded by us, and she is above our God in powers and decisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment