Mohammad: Islam

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dXApZK4GZ4 This video adds to that of David Wood: there was still a challenge that Mohammad imposed to Christians when he lived: he said that the one with falsehood in his tongue would be cursed by Alah and they were debating over Jesus and Islam. Less than one year later Mohammad died in a shameful manner and claiming his aorta was being severed, which is the death that he prescribed for the false prophets. All those who were closest to him in terms of family bonds and were with him during that time, of the challenge, died in horrible ways too.

The Jews

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8jf_PTSY_Y - It is nice to know they do believe everyone has got a soul, so also women, different from what is stated in the gospel of St Thomas. They still refuse to accept Jesus, as we can see in this video, so that they are ingrateful and bitchy. They talk about us fixing things ourselves, though, what is good. I found it interesting that they mention Amalek and those are supposed to be destroyed by the Messiah, according to them. Those would be blood lickers according to Wikipedia: Leinha is a blood licker, like she tried to drink blood but couldn't, as far as I know.

Rapture

Many oppose the inclusion of the book Revelation in the Christian Bible. Those have arguments of the type John, the Elder, the disciple of Jesus, did not write it, since the style of writing is completely different from his style, which is revealed in the gospel with his name on it.

Some of the worst consequences of including such a book in the Bible is the rhetoric of one of the most important terrorist groups we 'do research on' (that attacked our people, family and coupleship during our life time so far): black 'Nelson's' group. They believe the vacancies in paradise are counted, so that, even if the person is a wonderful Christian, they might not make it. They don't understand Revelation is about the rapture, a single moment in history when groups of people will be taken by Jesus to heavens and will come back to preach around earth. There will be several groups but Revelation only talks about one of them, the first one, which will be formed of 144,000 virgin males who never told a lie or will never tell one after speaking to Jesus face to face. They are also males who have been 'bought' to be offered to Jesus and God in the same fashion lambs were in the beginning of times (Old Testament), so that these men would be in slavery up to when they are 'given' to Jesus and God, that probably being why they would be virgins.

Human kind is being renewed all the way through between Jesus' coming and rapture, so that people are dying and being born all the time and they are all going to hell or heavens all the time too, depending on the result of the judgement of their acts, as for the Bible teachings. That means everyone who earned their spot in heavens had a spot prepared for them by God or His representatives. Nobody was left out that did what God expects during their life.

The Jewish are Jesus' chosen people and he was put on a cross where one read, King of the Jews. They obviously did not deserve Jesus and there is at least one monarch who offered his town and people to Jesus to replace the ingrateful Jews. They still don't accept Jesus, as for the vast majority, so ingrateful/bitchy they are, and they told us the name of Jesus in their books is Yeshua, which is the name of the demon, as we explained here earlier on. Yet, Jesus used their sinagogues to preach on occasions and was seen in no other type of temple. They must therefore, at least sometimes, specially when we are in doubt, have righter teachings. They say the following about life after death: "Olam Ha-Ba (The World to Come): This is often described as a spiritual realm where the soul goes after death. It's considered a place of peace and closeness to God. Those who lead righteous lives are believed to enter Olam Ha-Ba. Gan Eden (The Garden of Eden): Sometimes referred to as "paradise," Gan Eden is thought of as a place of spiritual reward for the righteous. It is distinct from the Olam Ha-Ba and is more focused on the soul's immediate experience after death. Resurrection of the Dead: Many Jewish teachings include the belief in the resurrection of the dead during the Messianic Age. This future time will be marked by peace, justice, and the restoration of the world under the leadership of the Messiah. Divine Judgment: Judaism emphasizes the importance of divine judgment. While the specifics vary, many traditions hold that God judges each person based on their actions, intentions, and the way they lived their life. The outcome of this judgment determines one's place in the afterlife. Repentance and Forgiveness: There is a strong emphasis on the power of repentance (teshuva). Even if a person has made mistakes, sincere repentance and efforts to make amends are believed to open the possibility of forgiveness and a favorable outcome in the afterlife." Paradise is therefore a place where everyone who is righteous is welcome and received, full stop, like definitely not counted spots, but enough to accommodate the entire human kind, in case they are all righteous.

Soul x Spirit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7v-e-RG2JnY talks about the differences between soul and spirit. The Catholic Church says they are different things: https://www.catholic.com/qa/difference-between-human-soul-and-spirit-2nd-use. The differences would be that the soul connects to the body and the spirit connects to God. The soul takes care of things such as emotions and identity while the spirit directly communicates with God. They would both be given at the same time and they would both depart the body by the time of death, according to Catholicism. The Bible is clear: we become a Living Soul after God breaths into our nostrils, therefore only after we are out of the belly of the mother. We then understand that the soul is our essence: what will be judged by God after death. The spirit, according to them, does not die after death, so that it will join the mass of the Holy Ghost then.

Spiritists believe we speak to the spirit of the person, not their soul, after death, and they say the soul is an incarnated spirit, so that, once the human being is alive, they have a soul and it can sometimes detach from the body, therefore become spirit again, and travel (astral travels). Here their theory: https://kardecpedia.com/en/study-guide/2/the-spirits-boo

For spiritists, both soul and spirit carry our identity, therefore, and they don't exist at the same time for a particular individual: it is one or the other. For the Catholic Church, an evil god, so say the devil, could 'turn off' our capacity of communicating with heavens by suppressing our spirit, therefore, even though this same evil god could never turn off our identity without killing our bodies. For spiritists, we never lose our capacity of communicating with heavens if the body is alive. Communication with heavens must be a requirement for God to find us on earth and therefore be alerted as to whether our body is alive or not, is suffering or is well and so on. It must also be a requirement for us to get the coordinates as to where to go after death. We don't have the spirit, then our soul may end up literally lost in space or in hell. If it is all the time the spirit, then we don't have problems when we die. If a person is in my situation, they can experience having the spirit, as defined by Catholics, turned off, like, at a certain stage, the satanic removed all my brain and therefore all possible communication with the beyond. That would mean that, if they die at that moment, their soul will be lost in space. That sounds unfair and irrational.

If the person is bugged and in phase out, there is certainly no communication with the beyond whatsoever or possibility. In this case, all the people the marginal killed after putting in phase out would have souls that would not find 'their way home' after their death. If, after we have God's Brainwashing going, we ask spiritists and they say one of the people who were killed by the marginal like that returned, we know the Catholics are wrong. Intuitively, though, the spiritists seem to be the ones with the truth there.

Angels

https://kardecpedia.com.br/en/study-guide/886/heaven-and-hell-or-the-divine-justice-according-to-spiritism/6789/part-first-doctrine/chapter-viii-angels/angels-according-to-spiritism tells us that angels are the most developed spirits, the fully purified ones.

In this case, contacts with angels should acquire the same shape as contacts with usual spirits: they have no wings or special looks. The Bible has a passage which refers to 'the angel Gabriel' visiting Mary to see if she would accept the incumbence of being pregnant, delivering and raising the son of one of the Elohim, our God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. We then went for the original word that got translated into angel, and that would be a Greek word, ἄγγελος, which has a few meanings, but the most adequate one would be 'messenger', as we see on https://biblehub.com/greek/32.htm: "Derived from the root ἀγγέλλω (aggellō), meaning "to announce" or "to bring tidings."

Then how do we explain the visions some had? The bug in the head is one way of explaining those: I am sure the devil likes taking a scoff once in a while (so perhaps the solid hollographic image of their so advanced science). They could then produce corporeal feelings allied to that vision, such as heart warming, so that the victim gets even more impressed. The devil loves logic, so that he would have his objectives being satisfied there: for people to adore the statues of angels (where it is 'said' that they have no sex/genitalia and, most of the time, look like little fat and ugly babies who show themselves naked to us), adore angels, therefore put something or someone above our God, who thinks that is one of the worst sins, for people to be mislead into what they should be doing while on earth (so that they can send those hallucinations and convey messages for them to believe those are from our God and follow), for people to suffer accidents (from seeing their image somewhere), for people to spread wrong theory (like the person is already bugged so that the devil could simply pass an order to their brain for them to do something, so that the need for the image is more for the person to preach and influence the unbugged righteous so that they are not together with others of their kind through the Holy Ghost, and so on. Today the satanic who most violently attack my body had the word of God once more: as time of the salvation approaches, they seem to be conveying more and more messages of God. One of them said the spirits look for one of their kind, that they need those to be able to communicate with human kind, and the spirit of Frank Sinatra found mine in the same way the others before him did).

Once more, the Bible should never have been put together: it is a sin per se. Unless read in full each time, studied as we would study a university book, as if we had exam next day, with pure and open heart plus clean soul, when God will reveal a personalized message by the end or even during its reading, it shouldn't really be useful and it is probably (99% of chance) going to be harmful.

It is obvious that the right translation is at most messenger: one of the Elohim, sent by the Elohim who is our God, came to speak to Mary. The Elohim have bodies that look like ours (therefore they do have penises!) and can have sex with us: it suffices that they want. However, once more, only the women (so just to once more reinforce that women are superior to men in God's hierarchy and that men need a wife to get to God and receive messages that contain no mistake, what is confirmed in several ways, including the fact that God would let the temples be watched only by married men/couples) would have the possibility of enjoying the privilege of becoming partner/wife of one of them, so of having sex, family and children with them, and they always marry when having sex (we are still going to prove, with Science, that they are right in those choices, if required), so that the Elohim who are males are definitely heterosexual (and we can prove that scientifically as well, if required: that sex should always be with the opposite gender, just one partner, and the male should always marry the female they had sex with). Since angels are spirits, according to spiritism, those cannot have sex with us, like unless they posses, or communicate through, one of us, humans. In this case, the translation made us go from a being that is 'like us' to a being that is 'weird', worse than the actual ETs, the Elohim.

Just a messenger, so that the word 'angel' should be replaced with messenger. We should finish with all statues, since the Elohim told us to never have those but, if insisting with those and angels, they should be dressed because otherwise nakedness of humans is associated with heavens and things go in the way I here described (either in the blog Religion or in the blog Crime). I don't see why the messengers should be ugly and fat babies and I don't think anyone ever saw those delivering messages to humans, so that those are really atrocious, but so are the ones with wings.

Some more details about 'the Bible drama', just as a curiosity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhTX1hG2_B0

Once more, God was never complex and never said 'read and I will save you'. God is about something else.

On the topic sex and human kind, see also here: http://academicstogetherforever.blogspot.com/

Sex Bomb Victims

Today God gave us the englightenment about disloyalty in marriage of the type husband betrays wife: when the sex bomb/terrorist/vaca, so women who have been trained in the ways of terrorism to use their gender and sexuality as a weapon of subjugation, attacks a target, and we have a good man as their target, so a God's man, they sometimes succumb. One of the reasons for that is peer pressure, as in SENAI/CETIQT: Sergio literally ordered the death of our doorman because he refused to betray his wife with his female fellow when she cracked on him and the beautiful Christian doorman was killed, shot by a black boy who had the looks of a 7yo kid in front of everyone else; a very painful and humiliating death. Another is no way to escape, such as when they are bugged and buttons are pressed in full, or when they are locked somehow by the perpetrator, say in a work environment, in a work conversation, while they are being physically attacked and the arousal happens by means of friction or whatever else and that is followed by more physical abuse.

When those good men succumb, they are all biblical, so that they will literally marry the woman they now have sex with (bibical marriage happens when we have sex with each other: God then puts us together forever as a couple). The problem, when these women are the VACAS, is that they obviously don't want to take those men with them: they are just giving them more win, like they won once more; they got it. 'Veronica' has a tally at home by the time I am saying bye to her in Leblon (seriously: she counted the amount of men she had had sex with and used that to impress us all and also other men, such as 'Braganca').

I am now sure the figure of the goddess exists and she is superior in powers to the god we 'supposedly saw' (as said, Genesis cannot be true, so that we could never have taken it seriously. Just to add more than what we have already added to the cake, examine Genesis 1:6, "And God said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.” Please note here that water evaporates all times to the lower part of the sky and the vapour then condenses to come back again as water, so that there is water all the way through in the sky and no water then sky then water again. Even if you think the clouds that contain water are the same as water, the sky appears also before those so that the sky is not dividing waters from waters, at most part of it is doing that for a time only, so until there is precipitation. And what about the places where it never rains? Where is the water-sky-then-water thing?), so that God must always hear her first and above all others and therefore the man copies God's wisdom and hears his wife first and above all others. The good man who was raped by the creature from hell/the vaca/terrorist will marry her now, so he is not the husband of the woman he was with before that date anymore. With that, he now respects the creature and she says she doesn't care if he has sex with others or lives with others or whatever else, since it was never about his love or their communion or her respect for his humanhood, but about use/abuse: he is just another 'pawn' she moves. He is then now thinking he is doing no wrong if staying with the woman he had up to that height as wife and betraying her. The good man however, if in this situation, would not lie to the wife, and lying is not the same as not volunteering the truth: he will tell her if she ever asks the 'right question' but those who keep on being betrayed after that point obviously never asked questions of that nature.

The bad/worthless man, on the other hand, will volunteer betrayal, so that he will initiate contact of sexual nature with another woman. He will accept engaging in illicit sex with the other woman without having had his head bug pressed to an extreme. He will still listen to the woman who was his wife before the act first and louder than anyone else, so that, in his impure heart and unclean soul, he is still married to her. He will then lie, so he will say, I never looked at another woman in my life since I met you, to her after having engaged in sexual activity with another. If the woman asks where he was by the time and date he was having sex with another woman, he will say he was at work or something of the type.

The bad man obviously cannot be forgiven and the wife should seek divorce as soon as she realizes what has happened: she should reject any emotional, sexual, corporeal or spiritual connections to him, deem him worthless, collect her things, wipe off her feet, turn her back at him, leave the house and never look back. She should also seek financial compensation using whatever means the laws provide for the time and effort she put into the marriage.

Should we forgive the good man who was attacked by one of the vacas? Then, we should ask the goddess if she would forgive her husband in case that were Him. She would definitely say no, since the husband is expected to have her level of wisdom and greatness. Yet they know everything that there is to be known and know the ways of the devil and know how to defend themselves from his attack. We don't even write about these attacks or 'rape of men' until I mention that here or in person to others. How could our men defend themselves then? The good man in our story here seems to be free of guilt. However it was still a time interval during which he wasn't having his body given exclusively to us and that is a horrible sin. He should volunteer and tell us immediately when such a thing happens but, if we are good women, we know when it did, like they will behave differently. We are then on the obligation to ask immediately. The good man would then have to tell us. If he doesn't, he can't be forgiven and should be treated just like the bad man. If he does, we can go to a police station together and report the rape. Provided he is ready to accuse her before the authorities and therefore confess his sins in public, tell of his pain and suffering, his shame as well, and punish the woman accordingly, provided he regrets wholeheartedly and asks the goddess, God's wife, to forgive him through Jesus in front of his wife, committing to never sinning anymore, being always attentive for that sort of thing from then onwards, undergoing holy fasting (only water, staying at home 24h) for at least three days and praying at least twice a day showing his wife his praise and prayer, praying in rags and with his body to the ground, open arms, and the wife judges his praise and prayer to be adequate, on top of him feeling that God forgave, paying his wife one month's salary in compensation (if he is unemployed, he should borrow money and pay the equivalent to the minimum wage. If he is wealthy and doesn't work, he should pay the equivalent to one month's capital gain with his investments), it is OK to keep on going. If he doesn't do one of those things, though, he should be treated just like the bad man.

As I wrote this, the humans representing Elon Musk and the carioca 'Tom Cruise' in my head had their heads changed into a deformity, something like their satanic version. I then remembered that black 'Nelson' and 'Braganca' once took me to a field covered with beautiful green grass and both of them executed a 'routine' in front of me. I had been prepared by 'Nelson', if I am not mistaken, for that occasion. He had warned me about it somehow. They were together with me walking until they decided to stop somewhere. They then started what seemed to be an argument and created a space between themselves. I then observed both faces going funny, similar to 'Elon's' and 'Tom's' now: I had been told that it would be like the devil in them being revealed to me or something similar. The funny thing is that it was not an hollographic image as the ones we have nowadays, since the image was as if it were reality, so as if their heads had actually morphed into that shape (the hollographic images we officially got to are very weak in definition, not solid or anything). I am sure people can have hallucinations from outside of their bodies created by the bug in their heads but I am not sure about these hallucionations having the exact feel as the people themselves, as in these cases. I know they are years ahead in science, usually more than 20, so that they could have reached perfection in hollography long time ago, so at most by 1980. This part of my memory is not illuminated at the moment, so that I cannot see a 3d of the scene in my head at the moment, but I reckon both touched something in their pouches before the head was changed. It lasted for very short, perhaps because I could ask to touch their heads or something and I would then notice?

They said that if we could guess their crimes they would give us freedom.

The First Ones on the Planet

In Genesis, 1:27, we see: "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them".

From here we understand both male and female were created at that time, so together. It is clearly the case that our theory gets confirmed here: The 'he' is God's image and the most logical thing for the 'she', given that Elohim means spaceship, is obviously that she is the Goddess' image, the image of God's wife.

There is absolutely no reference to soul or spirit or the alike.

There is a sequence of days of creation and the creation of the 'he' and the 'she' mentioned above happened between the fifth and the sixth day according to that chapter of Genesis (1st chapter).

Notwithstanding, in the second chapter of Genesis, when God has already created everything plus at least one man and one woman (the passage is not clear: it could have been several).

Notice that the 'he him' and 'he them' are both very weird, very suspicious. That is not right English: what do they actually mean? We then found more reasons to believe our theories, which however should have been at least inspired by God: 'created he him' is what it says. Yet the original text reads (https://biblehub.com/text/genesis/1-27.htm) בָּרָ֣א

bā-rā (create or creator, https://hebrewwordlessons.com/2019/06/02/bara-being-creation-defenders/#:~:text=CREATE%2FCREATOR%3A%20bara.,Sounds%20like%3A%20bah%2Drah)

and אֹת֑וֹ

’ō-ṯōw (him, https://biblehub.com/text/genesis/1-27.htm)

In this case, it is clear to us that it says nowhere that this God, who creates, is a He or a She.

Therefore the original is simply saying that one of the Elohim created the he at his image and therefore, since the same bara appears connected in the next line with the she, we an safely say that another Elohim created the she.

To make it all better, 'in his own image' is בְּצַלְמ֔וֹ

bə-ṣal-mōw (https://biblehub.com/text/genesis/1-27.htm) in Hebrew and this expression means 'in OUR image' instead (https://biblehub.com/hebrew/betzalmenu_6754.htm).

We are then absolutely sure that there was a God and a Goddess and the first man was created at the image of the God and the first woman was created at the image of the Goddess.

Creation finishes at the seventh day, after which God rests and that is in the second chapter of Genesis, verse 2.

What follows that is "4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens,

5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.

6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul."

https://theisraelbible.com/bible/genesis-2/ brings the name Hashem for Adonai Elohim, which would be a different Elohim from the Yahweh Elohim, who had created the male and female before the 7th day of creation. Americans write yellow car to mean a car of yellow color, so that it makes sense to me that they would write Adonai Elohim to mean Elohim of the type Adonai.

https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/147609?lang=bi talks about another type of man, coming from the ground, so three humans would have been created as first human beings according to him, instead of two: one woman for two men. That perfectly matches our intuition: the woman is the one who would need more than one man to become sexually satisfied most of the time, given that the average man is unable to have sex once a day with his wife.

Yet, we don't believe that: we believe Genesis is an atrocity: first of all we don't know who wrote it, so that it could be anyone 'just playing with us' and inventing that all. Second, it is irrational, as pointed here (different languages, different races, different physical traits, no wisdom in the life of Adam or Isaac and so on). Third, there is no date in it, so that we cannot judge if that is compatible with the history of the world (like were the dinosaurs existing with Adam and Eve or not? Humans had already invented writing or not? Did both men and women write and read (if the women didn't, we already know we cannot trust it) at that time? So on).

It seems that the name 'Adam' appears only in reference to the man who is made out of dust, however. That makes sense with the meaning of the word Adam (https://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Adam.html). We then understand males and females have been created by one of the Elohim at the image of the own Elohim.

One of the sources mentioned here talks about Adam being a labourer of the land. The biblical passage refers to him receiving the breath of God in his nostrils to start breathing, so that land labourers would perhaps have a non-human shape, we understand. Yet, if they have a human shape, they must be made of different skin or something. As one of our sources points out, we are not told how the first females and males were inside, just outside of their bodies. Where does 'that model' come from then, like of our inside? We understand the man created by Hashem (one of the sources says Hashem) or Adonai would be made of a different matter. One of those types of humans got extinguished, since we are all made of the same matter these days.

The most logical thing would be that the males and females created at the image of the gods finally learned from Adam how to cultivate the land and they could then keep on going on their own after Adam was dismantled/died for being made of dust. Yet the Bible says that the one made of dust is the one that procreated, Adam, instead. Yet, the instruction 'be fruitful and multiply' appears on chapter 1 from Genesis (1:28), so that the ones who are advised to multiply are not Adam and Eve but the first ones instead.

As much as I would like to keep on going, human life is limited: it is all wrong! We can keep on trying to fix it but, sincerely, what are the chances that anything there is right? We not only have more than one god, actually the normal and expected thing, a god and a goddess, but there is Adam1 and Adam2 according to some and, according to a few, only Adam1 got the order to procreate, so the ones who were the image of the gods. We do confirm that from reading the Bible and God says that Adam would have learned good and evil from acquiring a wife (also says he has become one of them, so one of the gods, after that), what happened after he ate the forbidden fruit. If we then want to push it, we will say those were two different races of humans, yet, once more, we are not made of different matter.

We do believe we have more than proven that it is possible that someone knew the story of those people that be not them (and they didn't write any books, as far as we are told), say the own Elohim, or their descendants, yet those who knew cannot have written Genesis. Abraham, Isaac and Jacob existed, more than likely, since God still calls Himself God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in Acts and that book comes after the Old Testament and therefore can be trusted better (we seem to know who wrote the books of the New Testament. Acts would have been written by St. Luke the Evangelist). Yet, we can surely dump what the Bible brings about them for the reasons we mentioned above and on another blog post here.

Maybe the report on the life of Moses can be trusted, but this is something for the Marcia Hopes. I worry about that just because Christians should follow the New Testament (which should be a renewal of the word of the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses, since Jesus updates the laws: for instance, he decides for not stonning or punishing promiscuous women as a society and he also decides that nobody should be cursed by means of a disease) and there Jesus says He is the God from the I AM, therefore of Moses. That would be the same god we just mentioned, of also Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Yet, the only report of life we may be able to count on, in terms of 'model of living', which is ultimately what matters for the Christian when reading the Bible, would be the one on Moses.

Justin Bieber is With Us

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw66r7NdS20

Marked for Usurpation?

So, a couple of days ago I received a YouTube involving a movie about Tom and his face was completely changed. I then associated that with the feeling that he is not accompanying me as much or at all and came up with the theory: that if they let me be with him, then it would not be my 'he', but a replacement.

They then made 'Min', my fellow from St. Paul's, take a picture of me with her and my image was completely different too, so that I this time detected that they had decided to usurp my life then: if I thought his couldn't be usurped and rejected being with anyone else for so long, specially in this being the Final Battle, I would then be usurped too, basically.

I then wrote here about spiritism yesterday and there was a story that came from my thinking, that he then would give me more love, I then had a couple of YouTubes of his that looked just like the ones he used to send to me in the past, like containing his energy. I then go, he must be alive (they destoyed our twinhood and all I then have got is impressions. There is some perception which I cannot label, however. My intuition told me he had not died or been replaced but all evidence pointed at that not being true: 'Barbra Streisand' and her song in my head, the distance I feel we have everyday now, when compared to before, like I don't really feel him inside of me, the YouTubes and all else. I don't know how to explain this, just something I feel, that he would still be alive, despite all the evidence on the contrary).

Anyway, there is a very high chance that this is the only way out of the torment/distortion of all it should have been for us on earth, specially at this stage. It is certainly what all the people who come to my head think should be, like all those whose images or voices haunt me, apart from his, so his doubles, males that appear in the middle and channel his energy and so on. We obviously need more people barracking for us, who we then hope would be those we cannot see or hear 'in the 666'. The only way out is God's brainwashing, that is for sure, but publishing about the device helps a lot.

Reincarnation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmDcpnQGO3A brings a bit about the topic. We then have 3 psychologists and 1 psychiatrist who defend reincarnation: they studied the matter also from a scientific point of view. Raymond Moody is a psychologist and a PhD, Linda Backman is a psychologist and a regression therapist, Ian Stevenson was a pscychologist and Jim Tucker is a psychiatrist. Ian got a grant of 1 million of dollars to disprove reincarnation but, upon studying the matter, ended up becoming one of the strongest supporters of that theory. Jim found the case of a boy who told his family he had been shot in the head while riding a bike in his previous life and he then told them his previous name and all else. They then took him to the place where he said he lived and found a family who told them exactly that story about their son and the boy was still born with 2 marks on his head, one to the front and another to the back, which were compatible with the way he had been shot, like with the marks he should have acquired. Yet, they took 'this way of proving', so the how they could be proving spiritism in a final way, from my head, like they actually asked me, using the bug: what sort of evidence could be final for people to get convinced of life after death in the shape of spirit being true. I then don't believe this proof very much. Yet there would be many other convincing proofs. I totally believe our twinhood was tied in the spiritual world, so before birth.

We observe that even if there is life after death in the shape of spirit and things go in the way spiritists have told us for many years now, the marginal will then say that they can last forever in the human shape using their own Forever Young (they got the result many years ago. Each new generation of bugs means a new terrorist group so far. We hoped (I had no idea I already had 2 bugs in my head and so did the love of my life, my 1/2, when I proposed Forever Young: they had completely wiped off my memories. They gave them back to me in 2020 and that is the only reason as to why my original plans are not working so well. I did not have the information that I would need to have to plan this to a point of not failing) our generation of the bug (I had no idea there were several generations of bugs before ours, so that I am saying this here, 'our generation', but that comes from current knowledge only, not from when I planned all, in that 2001) would be entirely ours, therefore God's bug, the one that would save human kind from slavery and all the other monstruosities we endure and would convert the bug into a good thing, something for us all to enjoy and use in our favor as we please, just inside of the constraints of the law), so that they won't really burn in hell: they won't actually die...

There was a YouTube the other day in my default for YouTube with a title that meant they had a strategy for us to use to prove reincarnation. Even though I got seriously interested, I did not click on the link that day and today I am unable to locate it. We intend to go through religion in Marcia Hope if time allows (we think of exposing and solving the issues involving the head devices, as a top priority, then talk about the satanic crimes (things like multiples and usurpation), then study/discuss major religious issues (Bible and Islam, soul and spirit, life after death, etc.) and then discuss/study plus solve other social problems, such as health and welfare).

If the spiritists were right about how life goes after death, we would live in a much more rational world, therefore we would like to prove they are right. However, we would like to be on stage to really prove things when it comes to religious matters, so that we may not deal with reincarnation due to the difficulty of actually doing that. We would like to prioritize fixing what we can fix during a show that will last only for one year, as for us presenting it/creating the model for the Marcia Hopes.

I now know (since 2020) that I actually watched the original Marcia Ricci Pinheiro being murdered when I was less than 6 yo. I then 'assumed her ID', as normal usurpation goes, however they erased my memories, so that I would not remember that until the Enmore house (2020). The thing is that she never came back in spirit to haunt me in any possible way. Yet, that would have to be a sudden death: they bugged her before 'forcing her to do their script' and I think she was then forced, via device, to move her body in a certain way, when they then froze her/gave her phase out. 'Hamish' (from Adelaide, Unilodge) was standing at the back of 'our house' in Ipanema, Porto Alegre, RS, facing the end of the back of the house. 'Braganca' then directed me to the front of Hamish and to the in-between him and the original 'Marcia Ricci Pinheiro'. He then stayed for a moment at the back of the house, more or less at the same height as Hamish, also facing the end of the back of the house. 'Hamish' then said 'my name', 'Marcia', and I then starred at him. Then I sensed 'Braganca' moving and turned to see him. He then directed himself to above Marcia and killed her. If I am spiritist, I would say she knew nothing about what was happening when she died, was completely unaware, so that she had no reference point to come back to, so that is how I would explain the fact that she never haunted me.

Yet, they also killed lots of people who were not bugged, such as those in 'our house' in Atlantic City. The couple's female thought she was connected by blood to our mother. I never heard them telling me of any of those coming back to haunt them. Once we get God's brainwashing going, if the marginal is still with the same ID and alive, we can simply invite them to the stage or interview them wherever they are from it and ask: they should then tell the truth and we can then trust their answer. They are serial killers and we can then see if there is any chance the spiritists are correct, since then the death of the person would have been traumatizing. The woman who thought she was our relative watched the male figuring as her husband in the house having his throat sliced. The blood came out of his throat as if it were a very volumous fall. She then, not knowing what to do, in shock in the beginning, tried to hold his blood with her hands, what she did until her own throat got cut by the Leinha involved (Australian one). The Leinha involved then said something to the extent of making the couple's female know that she wouldn't let her exist without him before she put the knife on her throat as well.

I do believe that, if we are able to locate the marginal, and God's brainwashing is on, we can go through every possible scenario that the spiritists claim would generate sure visit of the spirit after the death of the body, when we will then know for sure if such a thing exists. What is not missing is murder that they can tell us about...One could say it would be hard for the spirit to locate them, since they keep on changing identity, but we would think spirits mark spirits as well, not human IDs, isn't it? Some were raped, kept in confinement, had part of their legs chopped, stayed like that for a few days, bled on their own in confinement, no clothes, no food, no nothing, until they were killed, so that suffering is also what is not missing for certain victims, like because they say that if the murder is cruel they come back, as far as I know.

We can also ask the marginal about the so many spiritists whose heads they controlled via device, like we then ask if they were getting their information from beyond the human body or from inside of it, for instance. We can actually learn from the marginal about that too: how we can tell the difference between one situation and another. We can then use the bug of the spiritist, whose contacts with the beyond are most believed, and prove these things in real time.

I have only seen charlatans during my so few contacts with those who claim to speak to spirits. I also don't believe their words because, for instance, I watched some sessions in Melbourne that repeated (same words said, like same details about the spirit and same questions asked to the audience, where there seems to be always someone who says it is me). I once saw things from the perspective of those who are trying to work with them, like trying to be a fellow, and I then noticed some of us would jump and say it is me when nobody else was doing that for a time from the question being asked (they give information about the spirit, at most they say a first name, they refine the information with each new token, and I am then calling that a question).

The most famous medium Brazil ever had was called Chico Xavier (born in Minas Gerais, according to Wikipedia). People would make never-ending cues to speak to him. He would write entire books about the person he was asked to contact in the beyond. I once skimmed through one of his books, I think it was at the apartment of 'Marcello Catardo' (the man I once dated, when I was a teen. He claimed to have an imaginary friend at that height of life and he would be about 13 yo. He said the name of his imaginary friend was Kevin and I now think I am sure that would be Kevin Bacon because of conversations with Leinha, so that he was surely bugged), and thought the information on it was way too generic. Yet, those books looked very convincing for the families that got them. Chico worked for free: didn't charge for any of his sessions, as Alan Kardec says they should do. That also has to mean something, like way more evidence to the side of it not being charlatanism.

The Bible mentions necromancers as if they could really tell the future, give sound advice and so on. Spiritism has been around for an enormous amount of years and they have a lot of literature on the topic. It does create an impression of it all being solid. Since it is also extremely logical, the most logical theory about our lives and how things could go after death, were there one of the Elohim responsible for all or even all of them, it must be true for that part, of life after death. Notwithstanding, we do think we need more proof than what we have so far.

We have seen, by now, many miracles of demons: two magicians in particular, Dynamo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRb4pSXYsgU and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4rqbPACV5I) and Criss Angel, both available on YouTube, can walk on water, cross gates, fly, walk on walls and even fall from buildings of 4 floors and not die or suffer any scratch. They claim to have a pact with a demon. That is something I spoke to Trevor about: I was curious as to how this thing works, so that I proposed they got a few young men and asked them to go through the rites necessary to tie a deal with the devil and that they then showed us what they could get that way. I believe these two are in this proposal. I am sure all of us would like to do these things and it is pretty sad that God would not offer them.

Jesus walked over water and the Jews asked us to call him Yeshua, which is apparently demon in Hebrew, so that must be why some say Jesus was the devil. Yet, neither Criss Angel nor Dynamo help or give wisdom to anyone: people with pacts with demons shouldn't really wish for helping. Rather the contrary: Criss has killed someone and has cut off the hand of someone else on 2 of his YouTubes, like for real, pretending it all to be magic. If the demoniac start healing the sick, ressurecting the dead and giving us wisdom, multiplying food, like Jesus used to, after God's brainwashing is on and their bugs are out of their heads, then we may start believing that Jesus made a pact with the devil in the desert, as some say, or even that he was the own demon, as some of the Jews want us to believe. Notwithstanding, I doubt it very much.

Leinha talks about a ceremony ran on two sides, which made me think one side was the living and the other the dead: she then seems to imply the black 'Nelson' or someone like him got the spirit of a certain demoniac creature in them after that. I would like to then interview Leinha on stage, after God's brainwashing is on, and get her to tell us all with due names on it. We would then check the name of the demoniac entity they claim to have taken the body of the person, whoever they may be, study what we have recorded about them, then check whoever it is, say 'Nelson', and compare 'miracles' or something. That would then be to investigate invocation followed by possession.

If we prove spiritism is correct belief in what regards life after death, we can then use it to find out the consequences of having a pact with demons or the devil through the spiritists' literature and interview those who have a pact with demons, so say Criss and Dynamo, to learn also from them the price they pay. Provided God's brainwashing is happening, we should be OK. We can also ask them, provided God's brainwashing is happening, if the miracles come from the bug, since I did 'fly' a little with the devil when we jumped from 'Nelson's' spaceship to a building in front of the UTS together (I would have to interview the devil, after God's brainwashing is on, so that we find out if I was really there or my bug was synched with the bug of a doll or something. They did put me inside of the body of other kids a couple of times, so that I would try to move 'my arm', for instance, and wouldn't succeed. With a lot of difficulty, I would get some movement from the arm of 'the host' basically. Yet, the devil or 'Braganca' would still have flown a little in that case), like we can do that for starters, so that we only progress if they confirm that the bug has nothing to do with it.

We can obviously take suggestions from the public regarding what else we could be investigating and we will have lines (fax, e-mail, chat and telephone) open to the public 24/7 with people assessing each request at least during 8 hours of each weekday (it will be only weekdays, probably four hours each day). We will announce the next stage broadly and in advance, so that people can think about it.

Here we have some argumentation as to Reincarnation being something mentioned in the Bible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf6pxg-THjc&t=1s.. Passages say things such as 'through the washing of rebirth', 'born again' and 'then the disciples understood he was talking about John the Baptist' (that would be Elija, therefore the reincarnation of Elija).

Here we have mention to the Dead Sea Scrolls (the presenter says that the Scrolls could have been written by the Essenes and most scholars believe they were. Then he says that many believe the Essenes had reincarnation as part of their beliefs because they talk about rebirth of the soul and about receiving the soul back after death. There is also mention to Melchizedek Redivivus and Redivivus seems to translate into 'born again', so that we could think that is reincarnation. Yet this Redivivus part seems to be an object of discussion): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsILXkHAFvY

In the blog post Scriptures: Which Ones, from this very blog, there is a video about some of the missing books of the Bible and they then mention some books written by the Seers. In the video of the previous paragraph, the presenter says the Seers were the equivalent to mediums. We then wonder why they wouldn't have used the same word they had in the Old Testament, so necromancer.

The presenter also mentions prohibition of writing any book containing references to reincarnation, so that reincarnation was a topic that could never be included in the Bible and it seems that it was previously included in the holy writings.

More: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMHpIVclE5A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz0SQk5R57Q - Jesus received the tag, 'King of the Jews', on the cross and he preached in sinagogues, therefore Jewish temples, but not in temples of any other religion. He also did not talk about founding any other religion, so that it DOES look like he supported only the Jewish religion. According to this video and Rabbi, the Jewish do believe in reincarnation. They seem to think people can come back in the body of a vegetable or animal, depending on how bad their sins were before death (bad people may come back as animals: were animals, then here they will be for real those). He says that the Kabbalah talks about these things. They also believe in possession: that the bodies that don't want to die generate a soul that comes back to possess people.

Just like Catholicism, Judaism seems to forbid people from initiating communication with the dead, different from spiritism. Yet, in both Catholicism and Judaism, the 'holy books' describe instances of consultation with the dead (necromancer in the Bible and 1 Samuel 28 in the Jewish books). Judaism preaches that spiritism and consultation with the dead and mediums is detestable to the Lord. The Bible says doing those things make us be impure.

We must notice that several religions appeared many years after Jesus' Christ's death, so that they were not really around when Jesus walked among us and therefore, if they existed in year 0, perhaps Jesus would have chosen one of those instead of Judaism. Spiritism appeared by the 1800s (https://study.com/academy/lesson/spiritism-overview-beliefs-facts.html#:~:text=Spiritism%20is%20an%20occult%20religion,where%20it%20is%20called%20Espiritismo). Catholicism appeared by 590 CE (https://www.learnreligions.com/roman-catholic-church-history-700528). What we mean here is that, considering all religions that existed in year 0, Jesus thought that the closest one to what God expected or wanted from us was Judaism but one of the religions that appeared from year 1 onward could be a better match than Judaism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyqWllIgkn4 - some evidence on the soul coming back to life after death of the human body. Some more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q7eAV3N764, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzItboInv3w, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0VsIeBw7OI, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eX3z18m5sE, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiziAOl7ul8, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q7eAV3N764

A more convincing case than any other (the reincarnation of Anne Frank): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_Qx2-kUODY Yet, I now remember Leinha asking me questions about this case, like what could she do to prove she was the reincarnation of a woman who had been a writer and wrote a book when she was 12 yo. Since she put the entire situation to me back then, that was probably one more of the satanic illusions: she then bugged the girl and created the narrative by brainwashing her and so on. This is to then show the value of the brainwashing, that it really really sticks to the person's mind, to the point of the person swearing they are such or did something because they genuinely wanted. May God bless!

Terrorist Tool: Satanization of Information

I have just posted here that the God of Abraham, Isaac, Moses and Jacob, the God of the Jews, had a goodess/wife among the Elohim, His people. I do that having as reference the scenario we depicted before: Holographic image around a spaceship depicting a male Elohim, so that that would be the image God referred to when saying to Adam that he was His image. The marginal heard 'from me' (so from reading my thinking, so since I saw the information myself, which was a few years before 2000) that the word for god in the Bible is Elohim originally, so the Aramaic term, also that 'Braganca' had a book called Senhores do Mundo, which I gladly devoured when little at his place, where they said the word used for god in the Bible was Elohim and each word in Aramaic had some six meanings and one of those meanings was someting like spaceship (ship spitting fire).

The marginal then goes away and thinks of ways of satanizing the information they just acquired. My information should be made wrong and the book Senhores do Mundo, as mentioned by me, serves the purpose of informing them that the original word had more than one meaning and nobody really knows what it meant for sure, so that they think: what could I spread that would be believable and satanic? Many gods is satanic because the God of the Jews demands exclusivity, therefore it is sinning, perfect. They then see the possible meanings that are around and the one they pick is gods. They then make the information credible, in my terms, which is then having technical experts and sources (and the information about this one came from me watching David Wood instructing us about the Islamic bible: I then explained to myself, so also to the others that now accompany me also via voice, that his instruction was credible because he is showing us sources as he instructs and all else), and presenting things in a YouTube video I can easily access (they put it in my default). Here we go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLwDBEMjAxs

In this video, the first man to speak is a researcher (just a person who does research into something) who worked as a translator for very important and selective organs and he presents sources. He claims that the word they translated into God, singular, was theologically translated like that, but there is another version of the bible, one dedicated to scholars, that lets us know that Elohim should have been plural instead because of the verb that accompanies it. If they are right and the verb is in plural form, Senhores do Mundo could not be that right, since if it is a spaceship, only one, we would write the verb in singular form. On the other hand, he explains that the professor whose work he read, Professor Garbini, from La Sapienza, showing sources, says that we will never know what was actually written in the bible because the words didn't have vowels and scholars have to then guess those, among others. He says that even if all scholars agree on a certain meaning we can still not be sure.

The devil satanized things when he had contact with Senhores do Mundo, probably because they killed the author/usurped, like they seem to have done with Tomyo Kikuchi (creator of Macrobiotics, one of the most wonderful things ever created in the history of cooking), whose work also does not get to reach the populace: they hide the book from the public but enter its information in their system. We then cannot have access to the arguments presented by its author anymore. Yet they could be superior to those presented by Mauro in this video. I feel that I am right, that that is the truth, so Elohim stands for spaceship and the proof that this is a satanic video and they are satanic scholars is that in Genesis God says He created Adam at His image, so that the image that was seen by humans in the sky was the image of Adam, a single human being, therefore the verb should have been in its singular form, not plural.

This is just one more proof of the necessity of having God's Brainwashing before we can even think of investigating the topic on stage with our selected group of academics. What happens if I am on stage directing them with Tom and I don't have that previous knowledge, of Senhores do Mundo? Everyone will go with the opinion of the expert in Aramaic and, before that, with the opinion of the expert in archaelogical findings (how do we know that what they are seeing are the original writings?). We obviously need a world where everyone tells the truth, complies with the rules, therefore also with the ethical code, and does things with good intentions before we can even think of attempting to fix things.

As another point, and really forgive me here, if Adam was just created, and he was the first human, who was there to see what was in the sky creating him? What hands wrote Genesis? Besides, I don't think Adam or Eve wrote anything, even because they were the first ones on the planet. We seem to have started with caves, living inside of them, even though I also don't know how we get to that conclusion either, like I don't see how we could possibly have guessed. Our God says He is the god of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, so that it is clear to me that He was not our God before those exist, for otherwise, and if He ever supported our writings, He would have said: I am the God of Adam or from Genesis, perhaps from the books written by (this person). Wouldn't the first human have been there with the dinossaurs and therefore probably living in caves or something? How long ago that was, please? How can we possibly know these things? As another point, the same applies to the chapters about Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, like who could have been there to make a record of their history from beginning to end that be not themselves? This is all too suspicious. There is also no date. Because the stories of those do not match the tag 'God of Wisdom', who I am sure is our God, like the lives of theirs, according to the bible, never involved any wisdom, I believe they are not really their stories, so that I would like to know how the Catholic Church got those writings and how they decided that was their story. They describe things to the detail of exact words said and, sincerely, only being there to know, so that it is really not possible.

I do feel that the right theory is from Senhores do Mundo, and we then have outer space beings ruling/managing our lives here and then, some of them ruling/managing for longer, since it all depends on our 'welcome', like our praise, the rules we accept to follow, etc. The Elohim are like that: they are good in nature, like the original white Americans were to rest of human kind, before the satanic take over, they were to human kind as a whole. If they were the devil or satan (I recently learned there is devil and there is satan, so that they are different hell's creatures) or the satanic/terrorists, they wouldn't care about our volition and we would simply be subdued somehow (we notice that we do have the 'line' connected to the Elohim by default, so that they don't need to insert devices in us, like the satanic have done). According to the satanic, they brainwash us through the soul they make us have. Yet, if that were true, they would simply brainwash the own satanic and fix all like that. They are obviously extremely advanced and therefore do know everything about everything that there is to know, which means they love freedom and equality and fraternity (just like the French had already said) as well as loving/God's couples, limits/respect and so on.

Some satanic could think they either never had a soul or they managed to remove it through their brainwashing, so that they could alledge God cannot brainwash them and make them become us, the righteous. Yet, some of them join God's people once in a while, like the leader from ISIS tells us he did on a certain Youtube. They then must have a soul at that stage, since that is what Christians believe: that we all do. This proves that the soul was always connected to their human bodies and therefore, were the Elohim gods of violation, as the satanic are, they would have done it to them, but they didn't.

Today I contacted, via e-mail, a certain psychiatrist whose name I got from the Harvard University website for Psychiatry, Faculty, even though he appears connected to another establishment. That was a male of Asian background (I first contacted another one, yesterday, a male who seemed to be either a native American or a replacement of one of those). I then realized, after he appeared in my head, that 'the story' was that they would replace the native white Americans with Asians after that, so that I go, Jee, I now lost the world, like my people, so priceless to me, that I was finally recovering, and so on. It is all very unfortunate: the terrorists command human kind and this world in full for beyond the term of our lives and until we succeed in securing one satellite, passing God's brainwashing through it. The rest of my existence is then as commanded by their decisions as it has been so far (this is almost 60 years and I believed my life was going to finish at the age of 54 at a certain stage). No wonder, you'd say: I have 3 bugs in my head and, so far, not even a remote chance of not even seeing one of the bugs in the press in all its technical details. In reality, so far, nobody has bothered not even about publishing about the orifice in the ear or the CT scan trouble.

Love

The marginal conversed with me last night and she came up with the following: we say we love sex, yet I did not want to have sex with anyone else but 'Tom', so that I do not actually love sex and therefore it is not about sex and I can be left without it (I am castrated since 2020 in a few ways, hard to explain, but it would have come from my thinking (thinking to myself only, just happens that I am always heard, which is really great), that it was a sin ever even thinking of another man in that way, that of sex, after I recovered my memories, then I thought about how I felt, not naturally, we now know, but because of their devices and handling, and I then concluded that it would be just adequate that I were castrated until the day I could have sex with 'Tom'. The marginal does not miss opportunity to injure, so that that was not part of the story, but they gladly added, since that represents harm and their purpose on earth is inflicting pain, injury, loss and suffering over human kind).

The satanic/terrorist/marginal thinks absolutes/universals/literal, that then being the language of the devil. 'Love' is wrong word: the marginal brainwashed us with the idea that love is unconditional love, therefore that is what the word implies if you are building an argument, which for them is always logical and necessary. We say we love something means these days that we like that above all things, in an absolute manner, even though we know that when God said that, 'love your neighbor as yourself' (NIV), He was obviously not referring to unconditional love or all encompassing love, so also physical. Back then, that did the job, as we keep on saying, like for that society, and for what the Holy Ghost captured of the 'images of their spirit that came associated with their thinking', those words implied what God intended when using them, nothing beyond or different from that. Once more, the message of God is not in the bible (unless you read it all as you would read a university book, when studying for an exam that is going to happen next second, and you have pure heart and clean soul as you do it, since God then gives you that very tailored message, just for you, on what is important, what should matter to you while on earth living your life) but in the life, the wisdom and the guidance of those who are filled by the Holy Ghost, the spirit of Jesus: Jesus said he was the way, the life and the truth.

All prophets got the message directly from God, including Jesus, and therefore any book may teach you wrong. If you really want to know what you should be doing, you have to find God's people, first of all, through their miracles, their wisdom, their deeds, the flare you perceive they have, etc. and then try to be close to them, observe their lives, their choices, try to learn from them, exactly as those people from the bible did, all of them, with no exception: they were not reading from a book. They were at most taught by people like Jesus. In the case of Jesus, he used parables to teach, so things connecting to real life that he had had contact with somehow. It is not logical: Jesus said to eat his flesh and drink his blood to see if things were absorbed, basically, like he had given all he could and nothing was enough for those people there to learn something that mattered, since they were still sinning, rejecting him as the Messiah, plotting against him and so on. He then goes: more, only if you eat and drink my only body. He was then teaching us about the limits of humanity: if God is incarnated in a human body, and therefore subjected to our limitations, He can't gives us complete wisdom ever. The shape is important: God is not human. The ways He communicates with us are not necessarily words: many prophets received dreams and several found wisdom from synchronizing their souls with the Holy Ghost. True partnership with a wife or a husband is the first step: God chose 'his priests' among the married men. True partnership does imply being faithful and loyal and having your husband or wife as best friend ever, above everyone else on earth, and if someone you know would be equal to them in levels of trust for a certain thing, then that that person be not made superior to them ever, so at most equal. It is also important not praising someone else more than your husband or wife: for you, they should always be the most beautiful, attractive, wise, perfect and so on. God will give you that feeling if you initially force yourself to it, since that is 'the right vibe'.

Ironically enough, I am consumed from inside (Jesus was initially consumed from outside) for almost sixty years by all the satanic, specially those at the top of the pyramid. Even so, they are not learning enough or at all. There is a limit as to what we can do. That proves that only if you follow our advice you can find wisdom of the type etereal and our advice is not doing what you do but having a pure heart, clean soul and give your life to Jesus, repent of all your sins in a deep manner, commit to not sinning anymore and so on. Jesus said it is easier that a camel passes through the bottom of a needle than a rich person goes to heavens. Well, it is easier that the entire universe passes through the bottom of a needle than a satanic learns from us what matters to reach infinite wisdom, which would have to include true love.

Believing the God who gives us wisdom, so who is so generous as to provide, is a necessity. Following His rules so that He accepts you as part of his flock of englightened is also a necessity. There are always going to be questions, new ones, and therefore you are never going to be able to extract all possible wisdom from any of us, even because it does come from God on each insight, true wisdom comes through God only: we make the effort, so we concentrate, study, think and sacrifice, but, if God does not want, we have nothing even so. I do wish for proving that with Science but I need the satellite on so that Science is finally unbiased, non-satanic, and I also need to be restored together with my he, we need to marry and so on. We don't mind doing this as well, like one more for the devil/satanic, yet we do need some things done for us before that day comes. I am sure we can prove that the enlightenment of the person in the same conditions as God's servant, but with a different god or no god, is not as good, like the truth gotten without the God of the Jews, therefore the God of wisdom, is not as complete or as convincing. I also am sure we can prove that a man achieves much higher levels of wisdom and happiness and completeness through true partnership with a woman or through God's love for a woman and even higher if he remains with the woman that God chose as his half. I am sure we can prove that all. Also that a heterosexual faithful man who makes his wife sexually happy, perhaps also happy in general, has more wisdom and more balance and feels more as if he is one unity than the other types of men.

Scriptures: Which ones?

As said before, the Catholic Church commands us all in terms of what books form the bible, like so far. As incredible as it may seem, nobody has challenged their authority in a meaningful manner yet in those regards, even though many Churches were formed from dissidence toward the rules/teachings deriving from the scriptures. For instance, the Anglican Church disagrees from the Catholic rule regarding priests: Anglicans don't commit blasphemy there and are a couple when they minister. They also claim not to believe in transubstantiation (even though their pewsheets still talk about eating the body of Christ and drinking his blood, literal interpretation).

As proven before, the Catholic Church was never given any authority in what regards putting a book together so that human kind could extract the word of God from it. Having such a book is also against rationality and God's instructions/ways of interacting with human kind.

Yet, since such a book exists and some think we must respect it, it would have to include all books that involve the teachings of our God, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the Jewish God, father of Jesus. The apostles were 13, not twelve: 12 men and 1 woman. https://www.britannica.com/topic/list-of-the-Twelve-Apostles-of-Jesus tells us about the 12 men: Peter, James-son of Zebedee, John, Andrew, Philip, Judas Iscariot, Matthew, Thomas, James-son of Alpheus, Bartholomeu, Judas Thaddeus (Jude) and Simon. Mary Madaglene was the only woman. Some sources still mention other four disciplines, who would have followed/accompanied Jesus in a temporary way.

The apostles with books that 'made it' (equivalent to winning an Oscar, therefore, were it movies) were Peter, John, Matthew and Judas or Jude, therefore only 4, which means there are at least 9 (including Mary Madaglene here) apostles whose books attracted the prejudice of the Catholic Church. There are still the books of the 'temporary apostles' (4) and the books of at least the 'parents' of Jesus, Joseph and Mary, mother of Jesus (2), so that the Bible is short of at least 15 books considering what human kind would have produced by the time of Inquisition. If one then alleges that maybe not all these people got to write books, we can say that someone like Philemon receives a simple letter from an apostle, not even Jesus, and he 'makes his way to the bible', so that we definitely have very strong reasons to believe all those people would have enough material to deserve their own book in the bible. The Catholic Church team (here equating them to the terrorists that ruined life on earth and human kind now for 144 years) let at least four of these books be given informally somehow to the public, despite the size of their misinformation campaign: Mary Madalegne's, Thomas' and Philip's. We still got an extra book that leaked that we didn't count on when following primary logical reasoning: Enoch's. We are still short of at least 11 books (and we know there is way more writing that should be included).

Since St. Thomas' book refers to women not being Living Souls, different from men, compatible with the thinking of those that believe scriptures should be taken literally (the Bible says men become a Living Soul with the breath of God put in their nostrils but says nothing about women), and, if changing themselves into males, automatically acquiring a place in heavens, at least some of these missing books would contain essential information about the God we claim to follow, so that the Catholic Church should be judged and condemned for their crimes against human kind: this is not possible. We have the horrors of Inquisition (between 30,000 and 9 million fatal victims: https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/learn/histories/eight-witchcraft-myths/#:~:text=About%2030%2C000%E2%80%9360%2C000%20people%20were,cases%20where%20no%20records%20exist), the priests and nuns that marry Jesus (top blasphemy), the prohibition in terms of use of contraceptive (nothing in the bible against that), the prohibition of abortion (the only thing they could hang on to, in terms of the scriptures, would be the commandment, 'do not kill', yet, even Jesus would have told people to bring the unbelievers and slaughter them in front of him, therefore that commandment cannot ever be blindly respected), the statues (top sin, mentioned in several places of the bible), the processions that follow statues (adoration of idols), generalized sexual abuse (only between 2001 and 2010, 3000 priests were involved in cases of sexual abuse), the usurpation cases (my entire Catholic college in Rio was formed of 'nuns' who usurped. One of them, 'Maria Jose', told me that the reason was the swimming pool, sport, accommodation and food) and now the more than proven case of false prophets all the years since inquisition (about 800), since they are leading us to hell instead of heavens, being demoniac (cheating, lying and deceiving).

The Catholic Church is then existing in deep sin for about 800 years!

It is worth adding that one of the theories I gave Trevor in that 2001 (I was heavily satanized back then), since Bradley, he and Danny were into homosexual acts, so trying to help their cause, was that Jesus was probably gay, since he had split husband from wife and kids and had taken all those men (12 of them) to the desert, therefore where nobody watches them who would be human, together with a single woman, and we had heard nothing about him having ever touched Mary Madaglene. I was then committing blasphemy, therefore earning my place in hell, for simply having been denied access to these other books (God gave explicit instruction about male homosexuality: not to be ever accepted): Philip says, in his book, that Jesus kissed Mary Madaglene repeatedly on the mouth and never did that to the other apostles. Mary says, in her book, that Jesus gave her instruction that was never given to the other apostles, therefore that not only he had this extra love for her but he also respected her more than the other apostles, already implying something close to a marriage. It is missing a book saying they had sex. Notwithstanding, if they did, the God of the Jews, father of Jesus, is irrespectable: how could he split husband from wife, therefore deprive the apostles from carnal love, yet practice it himself? I then am sure, given the size of my faith and miracles received, that Jesus did not have sex of any type with Mary, that being compatible with Revelation (the 144,000 'virgins of Jesus', all males) and Genesis (God never wanted to create women and made Adam his own image but Eve, if created at the image of God's wife (and where else would God get the 'model' for His creation?), another Elohim, was not made aware of that because the Goddess, His wife, refuses to accept women in their Elohim Planet after human death: they must be changed into male to deserve being there then, as Thomas said). Notice, however, that if the God of the Jews were irrespectable, we would still have the other gods/Elohim from the bible to hang on to.

This video talks about 6 more books that were left out of the Bible, so different from the ones we have already mentioned: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXWijMmllh0

One more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtDyrq-eNsk

Another God?

If there is no other message coming from the God of Abraham, Isaac, Moses and Jacob, the Jewish God, after the message given to Thomas, maybe women should think of picking another one of the Elohim, someone who gives more rights to women, instead of fewer, when it comes to the after death.

From the gospel of Thomas, we understand that this god did not make us become a Living Soul, so that we have at most spirit and don't get life after death therefore or a spot in paradise.

We now believe the bible is formed from books coming from the history of people who had contact with several gods, like there is a different god for a number of the other books. This reasoning is reinforced by the fact that "the son of the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses" explicitly referred to Moses and that particular god, of the burning bush, the 'I am', plus Genesis talks about several sons of God, who should they themselves be Gods, there is a plurality of names for God in the bible and so on.

I am absolutely sure there is a god that allows women, and only women, who are sexually dissatisfied with the husband, to simply walk away even with the best friend of the husband. I'd love to be able to locate that biblical passage once more and investigate the name of that god. That should be one that gives us a soul as well and life after death, therefore.

Spiritism goes with the teachings of Alan Kardek and those don't discriminate against women, saying we all live after death and go through equal processes of development. That is now looking like a more rational belief for me, who am a woman.

There is also Seicho-no-ie (house of infinite development), which is a Japanese religion I once joined. Their teachings seem to be really good for the spiritual growth of women: they adore a goddess called Amaterasu, who then is the counterpart of the Sun God, who should be Yahweh, the God of Moses. I loved singing one of their songs, since it made me feel really positive: 'Aqui e o paraiso, eu sou filha de Deus, sou! Tudo ja melhorou, tudo ja melhorou, com certeza!' (Here is paradise, I am the daughter of God, am! All has already improved, all has already improved, with certainty!)

Thomas says "women don't deserve life" (114 of https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/maps/primary/gthomas.html#:~:text=Jesus%20said%2C%20%22Look%2C%20I,enter%20the%20kingdom%20of%20Heaven.%22&text=This%20text%20and%20translation%20of,)%2C%20edited%20by%20Robert%20J).

We are willing to also help sanitize religion in human kind through Marcia Hope: religion is really important. If there is any chance the Catholics are right, there is no life after death for us, women. We then want to prove everyting scientifically inside of Marcia Hope, the most basic things, such as if there is a human soul, in first place.

All visions people had during this last 144 years should have been hallucinations caused by the head bugs, so that we cannot consider any report of the type, I saw Jesus. I myself saw him in my head by the 1990s while living in Rocha, Rio de Janeiro: 'he' appeared 'inside of my head' in 3D and colors. I then had him putting my head over his lap and caressing me, so that that would be 'the consolator' (https://restoredtraditions.com/products/christ-consolator-carl-bloch?srsltid=AfmBOopiwEoRsE9D9pxyiwzQxblHFKtiFUCCwLlPy20ZTLrg-kcxLqod)

Equally, all messages attained in the period, also through 'spirits', should be disregarded. We will have to really erase the satanic period in spiritual matters and study the main points together, using unbiased science, so desatanized science (as explained, lots of things are wrong and have been made wrong intentionally by the greatest deceivers, so satan and the devil).

144,000 Places in Heavens

If we assume that our dominant thesis on the previous post is not true, then Revelation and all three mentioned books should have been included in the Christian bible. In this case, there is a chance the places in heavens are indeed counted and satan is right: even if everyone does not sin, has pure heart and clean soul, connects to God to best, some of us will not make it.

Alternative thesis: Jesus will give us eternal life in the human body. Elohim and Annunaki are our Gods (https://www.facebook.com/groups/AnnunakiHistory/permalink/1381647398585025/?_rdr). Yeshua/Jesus was one of the Annunaki. Blacks think they are more intelligent and they found the holy grail: if everyone on earth is black, Jesus will be out of options when that time comes, the time of the Revelation passage, and therefore he will be obliged to take blacks only. If everyone sins, including not telling the truth all the time and not being a virgin, Jesus must fulfill the prophecy and take the 144,000 plus the others and therefore will have to take the sinners instead of those from the passage (and those would be all blacks at such time).

The blacks, by then, will already have evolved enough in terms of mastery of the mechanical soul and mastery of violence/violation, so that they can then usurp life of even the Elohim and, as a consequence, acquire eternal life in the human body (transferring all the essence of the Elohim to themselves via bug), all of them, perhaps in the Elohim Planet (some sources say such a thing exists and they select a few of us to change them into eternal and put them to live among them there, so that their planet becomes our Christian paradise).

The blacks will then enter the spaceship of the gods, meet the Elohim/gods face to face and bug them to then take over. Those going first will be the worst marginals ever and those are then going to be the gods of earth after that. Everyone will be already agreeing with the satanic system, living inside of it, all blacks, all males (some of them being modified males, transgenders), and they won't have any difficulties with accepting the lead of those so few at that stage.

The reason why the so few have to be the most criminal and violent on earth is because other ET societies exist and may be hostile, there are no laws in space and so on. The blacks think Elohim and Christians are idiots because they want to be good and passive and therefore they can lose their seat for anyone else, just like Leinha grabs the ET and puts it out of its spaceship to take control of it, perhaps killing it.

They think the Elohim have a wonderful system of management that shouldn't be wasted or stolen as well. More recently, they did succeed in stealing to the last trace of my adored through the bug, so that it does seem true that the soul is mechanical and was indeed planted in us by the Elohim. Notwithstanding, we are going to say the spirit is the most that gets transferred in such a way and the soul is bigger than it.

The book 'Senhores do Mundo', a book I only saw in the personal library of the devil, talks about the word for 'god' in the Christian bible, originally in Aramaic, Elohim, having some six possible meanings and one of them being ship spitting fire.

All the evidence we have got points at the ETs being nicest people in the universe, so that we don't really have reasons to believe in hostile ET societies.

Since the blacks plan to have a society of males, half of them figuring as transgenders, they will probably have to find a way of changing their spermatozoids into eggs or storing our eggs somehow, perhaps also replicating them.

The Elohim would then be taking virgin males in the end, so that they don't want males to have sex and therefore that is why the American Braganca tells me that the ideal thing, the thinking in America, is not having sex at all.

In this case, we notice that the blacks actually hate us: they never shared the information with us and still acted with maximum disloyalty toward us all the time. This version of the story coincides with one of the reports of the black 'Nelson' to me, so that I now believe this one 100%.

Apartheid wouldn't solve because they have all these atrocious gadgets and management systems and other weapons: they would just paint themselves in white for a bit longer and find a way of replacing us, so that they would just keeping on doing the same things they have been doing all these 144 years. They can then kill all whites in a ship, for instance, and replace them all with painted blacks. They can make airplanes land on unexpected spots, kill everyone inside and usurp. They can come in spaceships and abduct us then kill and usurp, returning 'us' in the shape of a usurper. So on.

Google sources (first 6 pages) are scarce and bring very little information, so that it is very likely that is information they would like us not to have access to and therefore it is strategic for them. In this case, I believe they fear we will be able to protect the Elohim against them and therefore be able to stop the take over by the devil/satan/satanic.

If this is all true, the Elohim were a spaceship containing the 'gods of human kind' and they then projected an holographic image of Adam in space around their spaceship and our God, one of the gods in the spaceship called Yahweh (https://www.academia.edu/10974647/Monotheism_in_the_Book_of_Deuteronomy says Yahweh is one of the Elohim), which is referred to in the bible as God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, then said that He created Adam at His image, this being because there were no mirrors back then and therefore that was the only way Adam would know how he looked like (we normally can see our body parts on the front of those, apart from face, and we don't see anything to the back of ourselves. Adam was naked, so that the image he saw in the sky involved also his genitalia, therefore also his penis. The image may have rotated in the sky so that he saw the aspect of his entire human body).

Jesus was not Yahweh: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGdFap5i8-g, even though the Catholic Church decided, at a certain stage, that that was the case: According to them, Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit are all the same. That is when they thought they had solved the greatest puzzle of all and came up with what is nowadays called Holy Trinity.

Yeshua was not Jesus according to this source: https://benbornagain.faith/pages/jesus-or-yeshua says that Yeshua is an alternative name for Metatron, "the messiah of the Kabbalah", therefore someone similar to Lucifer, "the false angel of light". Yeshua was Jesus according to this source: https://www.oneforisrael.org/bible-based-teaching-from-israel/jesus-vs-yeshua/ (they then say Yeshu means a curse, "acronym for a curse: “yimakh shemo ve zikhro” which means, “May his name and memory be obliterated", but Yeshua means 'salvation').

Here we notice that either the writer of source one wants to deceive us and put us against the Jews (who would then have lied to us for a number of years, taking a scoff, and sustaining that Jesus was satan, very coherent with their declared beliefs, plus making us say the name of satan, since they then insisted that was the 'right name' for Jesus, and therefore making us be cursed, go to hell, the opposite to what we intended with the search for the 'right name' of the son of God) to highest or he is telling the truth about them and therefore doing the work of God.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kawcM6dWiEg says that the 'right name' of the son of God is righteousness instead, yet it accepts the name Yashua as one of the names for the son of God. In the just-mentioned video, we get some biblical quotes that imply that the son of God is also Yahweh, since he is the 'god of the burning bush' of Moses, and therefore the son of God is also an Elohim. We would like to add that Jesus IS NOT righteousness because he physically attacked the assets of others inside of the temple and he made others not stone a woman when she had been disloyal to the husband to maximum degree (had sex with another man) and not stone another woman when she was being accused of prostitution (Mary Madaglene, even though now the writings say that she got demons expelled from her instead of that, that was the story I was told when little). Jesus is truth, however, and that can be inferred using the same logical reasoning presented in the YouTube we mentioned in the beginning of this paragraph.

He says the 'right name' of the 'son of God' would be Asus in English. Since that happens to be a computer brand, the people who gave that name to the computer are satanic: one more way of making us go to hell. We now would say 'my Asus' referring to our computer and that would be blasphemy, equivalent to that practiced by the nuns and priests all over the world: marrying God.

Besides, please notice that Jesus referred to our God as Father several times and we all know the father cannot be the son. If Yahweh had a son with Mary, a non-Elohim, the son cannot have His powers, all of them, since she is human and needing her body to procreate and making her become pregnant imply that her genes were involved, since, if her genes were not needed, Yahweh could have made His son from where He was and simply sent him even if it were genetic manipulation. As another point, the bible says 'the son of God' had to learn the difference between good and evil and only after that he would be ready, but God always knows the difference between those, therefore Jesus cannot be God. He said he was I Am because he was part of the body of his father, had his genes, nothing else.

The biblical passage mentioned in the video whose html we just quoted contains information implying that Jesus was around when Moses existed on earth. When Jesus is then asked how that was possible since he was about 50 yo, he said: "before Abraham was, I am". We notice here that it is not "before Abraham was, I was I am" but he is answering as we would do in normal life sometimes: we give clues to people instead of saying the entire lot. He is then saying, "see, before Abraham appeared, there is I am", my father, therefore He told me or I was within Him for being His piece and learned by absorption or something.

If Jesus was not Yahweh and therefore the Catholic Church is wrong about the Holy Trinity, he is truth and was born partly human partly God. In Genesis 6:2-4: "the sons of God[a] saw that the daughters of men were fair; and they took to wife such of them as they chose. Then the Lord said, “My spirit shall not abide in man for ever, for he is flesh, but his days shall be a hundred and twenty years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown.." We can see that God could have chosen to procreate with Mary, if He so wanted, since the sons of God should be the same as He is, therefore Elohim.

Here we confirm that the sons of God ARE NOT God. If God had intercourse with Mary, He would have to marry her, according to the rules given by the own God to us, but, in that particular case, God simply wanted to procreate with her, and, given the biblical rules, that can only happen if God is married and His wife cannot give birth anymore and she authorizes Him to do so. Maybe because of the commandment 'Don't do to others what you don't wish upon yourself', God could not decide for not having His rules applied also to Himself and His interactions with human kind.

The bible says that Mary was a virgin when giving birth, so that she could not have had intercourse with God (http://fa.jmor.jp/pdf/13/2/013020115.pdf). In this case either a process like the artifical insemination took place or parthenogenesis or God made an egg of Mary become a spermatozoid and fuse with another egg, that modification representing a singular DNA coding that generates a semi-god or Mary was given God's sperm and smeared it on her vagina with certainty of pregnancy (despite the previous link, where we see that the chance is about 0.1%. That is compatible with the gospel of Thomas: it is written that God will only let women be included if they are changed into men and it is also written that Jesus changed Mary into man to be allowed to teach her in private.

Since Mary does not change her physical aspect (otherwise it would have been noted by someone in writing), we must assume that it is possible to have the DNA changed from woman's to man's and not have the physical aspect changing accordingly, what may imply all body functions, sensations and feelings are still feminine after that change. In this case, 'Nelson' had access to all this knowledge/information and decided that the closest thing he could get to that in the end was men physically changed into women, so that their DNA is still masculine and they then all go to heavens together. As another point, Thomas says "females don't deserve life" (114) and, because they are not a Living Soul, different from the men, they won't get a place in paradise (114), so that 'Nelson' may conclude that they'd better be all men and the transgender would be their best attempt to trick God: that they are women who got to change their DNA into the men's. He is thinking the world might be over (and I am sure they also have plans to exterminate human beings to that extent, so let's say the 666 factor is the bug in our heads and they then aim at having all bugged close to the day of rapture so that they can then kill everyone that is not their selected 144,000 by simply pressing a button since we then imagine a single action performed in all bugs, a single command given on a single computer. I would be really glad if those inside of the group were now noticing that that is what they are marching towards to, like each time controlling more heads from fewer computers with fewer instructions given by fewer people and so on. I then imagine that the bible or Nostradamus or another reliable source of information tells them about a sign that should come before rapture and, since the entire secret of their success is hiding knowledge/information from those below them, we can imagine that they hid this information from the rest of the their groups and also from everyone else on earth, so that they are the only ones who know what such a sign is) and only 144,000 will remain alive and he would like all of them to be 'of his type'.

That is when they may run Forever Young only on a limited number of group members, hoping that 'their selection' will be all that remains to Jesus as a choice, so that effectively they chose those who will be saved instead of Jesus.

Only women would have this capability, of changing their DNA to the other gender's, since there is still nothing, in all books we had access to so far, saying that men changed into women would be more special to God. God, in this case, if that is all true, would have spoken directly only to men all the time and that also matches even the information we have about Mary (that an angel of God spoke to her to get her authorization for the pregnancy before she was made pregnant of God but not God). That is compatible with Genesis: that only Adam was God's image. On the other hand, that is incompatible with the genealogy of the Annunaki, since they had both women and men. It is then assumed that only the male Annunaki agreed with the creation of an 'inferior race' and his wife then said, 'then make them be at your own image'.

According to Rael, the Elohim are a society of 'gods', which are then beings that last forever and they made us out of genetic experimentation, so that they would hold part of the truth (that is a religion that appeared in 1973, when Australia, USA, Brazil and England were already under high influence of satan, therefore Raelism must also be satanic, and cannot be considered the truth, at most part of it could. They obviously always have done the same: they steal our knowledge and usually make it disappear from our reach but sometimes they fragment it and make fragments appear in different pieces of theories or lives so that we start trusting those as vehicles of God, when they then will drive us to the satanic path and existence, so to hell, pain, suffering, loss and injury). We then understand that women were made superior to men (more of god's powers, perhaps because men asked for us to be present in the world, so needed us, as we could say we need a god) but were not given the allowance to speak to God directly because the goddess, His wife, ruled that way, as I would, were it me. I would only trust a spiritually inferior woman if she proved that she deserved trust (here worried indeed about whether the woman is going to wish for intimacy of any type with my man, so even if she is going to wish for him to give her more or equal attention or importance in life in relation to me). I do believe knowledge makes people be more ethical and more compliant in democracy and capitalism, where they sign for basic human rights, such as freedom, since then the rules are logical (they come from the majority, so that they follow the 'logic' of this majority and therefore can be told to be logical), if the official systems are respected (not the case with the usurpation and the satanic system being imposed to us for 144 years), this if it is acquired the right way, so in a licit way, so that the challenge could have been, 'if you are able to solve the puzzle and acquire knowledge enough to change your DNA into that of a man without changing your physical or emotional characteristics on your own, and despite what we all do to stop you from doing that, we will include also you in our planet or at least a few of your type'.

In this view of things, the goddess, God's wife, would be superior to Him in powers and, when God accepts (He didn't want) creating a companion for Adam, He consults His wife again and she then gives the directions: take one of his ribs and so on. That is because the goddess never wanted them to exist, first of all. She thinks that the man should be reminded that 'you become eternally responsible for what you captivate', so that he would be responsible for making Eve happy, she was 'part of him', physical part, and he must take care of his body to best because it is the body that represents God, His image.

It is interesting to observe that God is then truth but Jesus is "the way, the truth and the life" instead. He is showing things to us through his human existence, so what his human life means to us after death, which is his achievements, the greatness of his acts in terms of meaning for human kind/contributions (the life), but we only get to God through him, so by shaping our spirit (only part accessible to us of our Living Soul, which includes our body, and this part can probably be equated to the 'essence' we talked about before, what satan is able to transfer from targetted person to usurper before killing the target and replacing it with the usurper:https://www.catholic.com/qa/difference-between-human-soul-and-spirit-2nd-use) and treating our body according to what he demands in order for us to be taken by him to the Father (the way). He is also truth because he doesn't care about the laws or what the others are saying: he goes with what is true instead. He stops stonning of at least two women for reasons of promiscuity because the goddess is superior to our god and therefore could be allowed to sin sometimes and should be forgiven when doing that. At the same time, he says you throw the stone or judge her if you have no sin, so that men could finish with the gap in what comes to the law if they were righteous before the eyes of God (this doesn't have to do with our law, but with what God demands from us instead), like the day 'our modern Adam' is doing what God told him to do, 'our modern Eve' will pay the price according to the laws, since that is what is right for God.

God is truth and truth is the character of God according to the man whose name does not appear in the YouTube from the previous paragraph. Jesus is also the truth and is more than that, since he is also the way and the life, so that we get the impression that the father is under the son in greatness. Yet, as he said, this is just about the character, but we have all the plethora of powers and acts of God to think about and those were not given to Jesus in full, since he is a semi-god, not a god.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeeA_Abd5Nk - So, coming from the same people who previously told us that the right name of God was Yahweh, came this one: Now the name that is absolutely correct is Jehovah. No doubts the Jews, from the time of Jesus, were our God's people, but the Jews that survived the nazi horrors are not really bringing much to us since then. We must remember that God said He belongs to all people who have pure heart, clean soul and give their lives to Jesus, that is, who follow the teachings given by the life of Jesus, live in truth and go through him to the Father. The Jews are not coming up with prophets since at most the nazi horrors, so that the prophets must come from other peoples because the other peoples are then the closest to what Jesus expects us to be. If there are no more prophets, though, we must follow the words coming via the first type of revelation (involving contemplation) or Inspiration or Illumination (https://www.challies.com/articles/revelation-inspiration-illumination/).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVjxVFKIavU, https://www.studylight.org/interlinear-study-bible/hebrew/genesis/26-2.html and https://www.torahclass.com/lessons/old-testament/genesis/lesson-26-ch26/ all say that the name of the God of Isaac is Yahweh. https://biblehub.com/text/genesis/22-1.htm, http://www.qbible.com/hebrew-old-testament/genesis/22.html and https://urhotheway.com/2020/08/17/names-of-god/ say that the name of the God of Abraham, Jacob and Moses was Yahweh even though Elohim is also seen as one of His names. Because Jesus said he was at the burning bush of Moses, He connects to the same God, therefore to Yahweh.

We observe that the passage we here quoted - from Genesis - refers to 'sons of God' and therefore Jesus would not be the only one. Yet, John's gospel tells us that Jesus was the ONLY son of God (John 1:14). The sons of God from Genesis could have died, all of them. Jesus then was the only son of God by year 0. The sons of God should all be Elohim, like our God, so that they should live forever, following Raelism. However it is possible that when they marry a female human, they simply die. Jesus is a semi-god but he does not have intimacy with any woman. He at most had Mary Madaglene available to him and they didn't go close to having physical intimacy with each other, maybe so that he could guarantee life after death.

America and the native American white people are undoubtfuly Jesus' people since a certain point in time: the terrorists who enslave human kind for so long (144 years), the satanic, and those include the own devil incarnated in a human body and Islamic people, decided that they were the ones that were most likely to go to heavens. I and my twin were born from native American white people and therefore it makes sense that God would choose us to convey His message. In this case, though, the language of God is now English, American version, even though until the time of Jesus it was Aramaic and Hebrew. The Jews killed Jesus and Jesus then found other peoples for himself through his apostles...

With this, we must say 'God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob' and 'son of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob' or even 'God of Moses' and 'son of the God of Moses' when invoking God, praying and so on. Jesus would not give us necessary words in other languages because we would be in trouble when trying to communicate with him: since he has the power of the Holy Ghost, he speaks to us via emanations, even clear images, when trying to communicate with us.

Since the God of Moses says He is 'I am', it makes sense that Je Suis/Jesus would be the name of His son, here perhaps indicating that the French-speaking people were the ones making 'the son of the God of Moses' happiest by the time they came up with the name 'Jesus' (God only knows when that was).

Basically, the intercourse or marriage with a human seems to destroy the life after human death for the deity, so for the Elohim or semi-Elohim, but is OK for humans if the man takes his first woman in marriage and never betrays her. Having sex, regardless of the amount, provided that it is in marriage (one woman for one man) and faithful, does not make the couple not deserve a place in paradise. It is the opposite: couples where the man makes the woman sexually happy are the most welcome people in paradise, since they copy the Elohim.

With the death of the only son of God, and with the son communicating with us mostly through the Holy Ghost, God stopped speaking to us directly: the son became that to best understand us and our advocate, so that everything goes through him, as he himself said. In this case, it is Jesus who chooses who is going to be a God's messenger but the message still comes from God Himself.

We must also observe that the marginal is worried about rapture but we are continuously being selected by God, since all of us have eternal life (that appears clearly in the bible all the way through), and they then practice usurpation in an attempt to trick God, believing that if all humans are deceived by what they do, so will be our God, since Jesus was God and he had human shape, so all body resources and thinking capabilities we have. They then believe God will select them for a vacancy in heavens because they figure as top Christian in their last usurpation, so now they physically look like the victim, have transferred their essence via head bug and are being what the victim used to be for the world and human kind in all that is possible in that way. Yet, Kathryn Khulman is a proof that God is inside of us through the Holy Ghost and therefore He knows us from inside out and therefore he is aware of all they have done in life when they die. There is still what I said before: they know, for literally living inside of the head of the spiritists for probably 144 years, that none of them came back to say they were in heavens, despite all 'science' they have put into usurpation and they have seen 'their soldiers' coming back to say they were in hell. God has planned all this, so that the satanic can see inside of us two, God's messengers, and understand that, if they usurp our lives and transfer our essence via bug to another before they do that, they will know the difference between one and the other, so between usurper and original, and therefore God will also know it since the Holy Ghost is better than their 'vain technology' (they know that from observing their usurpers and the originals before usurpation repeatedly throughout the years, so that they are sure). Since our God does know the difference between a usurper and the original person, they are surely going to hell, I verily tell you.

As yet another point, if they take over the spaceship of our beloved Elohim, our gods of light, by usurping their lives too and transferring their essence to themselves via bug after bugging them too, and are only 144,000, all blacks, half of those transgenders, or all mulattos/cariocas (since we did detect deceit, lie and cheating from those over the Afrikan blacks, so that, first of all, they are considered to be 'the same' but they then aim at preserving just 'their own type'), their 'kingdom' will be over very soon, at most in a few generations, since it seems reasonable to expect that every race of beings (so, for instance, human race) has been created by a superior race (in our case, the Elohim), and each higher race would have then created their own rules, which must be obeyed so that they include members of the inferior race in their own, what we here call existence in paradise, and there will then always be necessity of having someone, even if just one, from the inferior race that is seen as a compliant being, so that they receive the wisdom of the superior race through synchronization with the Holy Ghost belonging to that superior race and, without that, they will always be subjected to extermination via even a new type of flu: all wisdom, therefore all knowledge and information, that human kind has got came from God, not from human kind; It is a gift we receive upon making the required efforts, so say concentrating, doing research, reflecting, having pure heart and clean soul, complying and so on. If they will all be mulattos, they will be the least wise of the humans (most indolent, useless and harmful, largest amount of marginals, choosing to follow the devil more times and for longer, least likely to ever confess their sins, specially to society as a whole, least likely to apologize, be grateful, etc.), Afrikan blacks come in second. If they are marginals, specially worst ones, they are the least likely to comply with the rules of their God and so on.

Besides, notice that human kind has got 8 billion people and only the people from Germany have ever been able to find a definitive cure for AIDS since it appeared, and despite their satanization of all sources, so 20 million in Australia and nobody found it. Other millions in the USA and Brazil and England, and nobody found it. Yet there were whites, Aryans and Christians among every single one of those peoples, therefore most likely to get the enlightenment from the Elohim. Now you want 144,000, an incredible tiny piece of the Australian population, yet only blacks or mulattos, to find the healing for any disease that might appear in their select group of 144,000? Diseases also appear out of the blue, despite them creating a large number of those in the last 144 years. Remember how many plagues we had since the start of humanity and well before they come up with their head bugs and satanic laboratories and universities... . The Spanish Flu killed at least 17,000,000 people (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu), so a simple flu would already decimate them, regardless of how much they think they can procreate after becoming the Elohim...

Also observe that their reason to leave their black places, so the places where the blacks were originally born, according to one of the top bosses of terrorism, was that they didn't want to attack 'their own type', so they were sick of, for instance, having a short lifespan (cannibals ate their husband, wife, relatives and children, like eventually), and they were naturally satanic (liked commiting crime, inflicting injury, pain, suffering and loss): they believed, in the case of the cannibals, that they were a superior human type, more intelligent, quicker in reasoning/action and therefore deserved lasting for longer than the other types or at least lasting for as long as. Well, simple logical reasoning tells us that the same reason would have to be applied to defend that they should never be left alone and together somewhere, since all the evils that led them to stop doing that would be over them again, obviously and trivially.

Besides, I would ask you all to make 'Trump' see that he is not a black (we are betting he isn't because he has got frekles) or a mulatto and, even though the marginal says he is a Russian, he might be just like us and be bugged since little and therefore have been brainwashed to believe whatever. If the marginal does scramble since possibly 1880, he is likely not to be the kid of the parents appearing in his first birth certificate, the original one, and therefore there is no reason to hate America or to support any plan of extermination of the Americans, even though I also don't see why Russians should hate America (or anyone else), just see reasons for them to be loved: the only people who proudly said every day of their lives, May God Bless America, and therefore the only ones praising God by default.

They are also the only people to respect God to the levels of making sure they didn't mix his pointer with cursing or triviality, such as when we want to express shock: they invented the word Gosh for those situations. Everyone else, specially the blacks, uses God, the same pointer for our Lord, in those situations, of cursing or trivialities.

I would then ask you to make 'Trump' see that there is a high chance he is not Russian either: his skin is probably lighter in color than that of the Russians, he is probably taller or bigger. Ask him to remember his visits to their Country and the physical type appearing in larger numbers there. To observe the shape of their bodies, how large they are, since he is very large. His hair might not be naturally blonde, or his eyes naturally blue, yet his hair is soft, light and straight, that might also be attained via bug, yet I believe it is his hair type. Would the Russians usually have such hair? Also make him see that it can never make sense taking a fight in the name of a Country, nation, people, physical type or anything else that means attacking other human beings: don't they usurp now everywhere and in large numbers? Isn't Australia now a foreign Country to the own Australia? Those concepts don't make any sense anymore: the devil has proven that to us.

The marginal has habit and history of 'planting narratives' in our head: it is only God that kept me and 'my he' knowing who we actually are, actually the Holy Ghost. They brainwashed us so badly, isolated and took away our twinhood to such a depth, played with our souls in every unimaginable way, whoever was inside of me felt and saw, so...at a certain stage, I believed I was mostly VACA, even though not promiscuous, I deeply felt as if I belonged to their world, that was my team. I then gave them strategies and instructions to make 'our team' win. That went on until I received the love of my half, until I noticed my spirit is our spirit, we share a soul, so that I do know who he is and he also knows me and therefore there are men on earth who could be trusted by their wives 110%, so that there is no actual war between men and women, that is all satanization: the more we had contact through this thing, the more God let me see the actual truths of humanity and this world, the more God was in me and therefore the more the devil was gone from me. I only got to the truth that he had MPD because I acquired certainty that I knew him, certainty given by the Holy Ghost: once more, God only gives if we are in that realm of the Holy Ghost with our heart and spirit.

In the same way, 'Trump' only believes he needs to destroy America, which obviously means he is something like a suicide bomber, who is gonna die with the target, so that as soon as he starts speaking to people who understand him, who he can trust, he will desatanize. It would probably have to be a woman, his wife, yet the satanic don't have true love, they all betray, so that I really don't know and need help with this one too. One must remember that I also deeply believed I was a Brazilian suffering from prejudice of the native white Australians, English and Americans, when I spoke to Trevor in 2001, even though I felt deeply connected and attracted to those, and those only, as if I only had in common for real with those, so that I created plots to 'make them cooperate' with Trevor, for instance.

It took me a lifetime (until 2020) for me to find out what the story actually was, and I only found out that after they gave my memories back: I could then make sense of all, like they were actually doing the unimaginable to keep me in Academia, where I obviously needed to be to have, first of all, more chances of surviving and keeping well, also the unimaginable to give me an academic position (offered straight away, already before I spoke to Trevor) and so on. They couldn't be more my people than they were being... . I then felt more Brazilian than Australian up to that point, 2020. 'Trump' may obviously have suffered from similar stuff, like, how can he know he didn't, if I believed 100% that all that was happening to me could be natural and I could indeed have been born in Brazil and be a natural relative of those who figured as my natural family, despite all the feelings I had of inadequacy, rejection and horror for those surrounding me that were not from those 3 countries almost all the time.

How can 'Trump' actually know? Memory enveloping, memory editing, brainwashing and so on: it is possible to make anyone believe anything even since their first word or before that, I am sure. Hate is something humans don't naturally have: all children are naturally good, that probably being the reason as to why Jesus said come to me little children. That all comes from the environment, upbringing and so on, so that it is all a form of brainwashing, even without the bug, imagine with it and having people who are satanic administering it? They can actually change your eye, hair and skin colors via bug before you first look at yourself in the mirror, change your language before you speak your first word, change your sex before you first look at yourself naked in the mirror, so all that, adding to the scramble, so that there is actually a very high chance all big guys on earth are not who they think they are (the marginal fears only those who are bigger, the devil told me that, so that they actually believe that if a male is physically bigger they can beat them easily and therefore they would obviously think they are better weapons in the fight against other men's thinking. People like the Brazilian Osama, the black Osama, therefore one of the top bosses of Al Qaeda, are very short and therefore, even stretching their arm to maximum, wouldn't be able to make their hand reach the chin of the other man if they were really tall and therefore they wouldn't be able to kill them with their hands, which is how they usually kill if the person is not bugged).

'Trump' said he converted to Christianity or he has always been a Christian and he said that to the press. He also advertised the Bible and said he is going to make it be the side table book of America once more. He has therefore already mechanically converted: saying the words, having the needed thinking, etc. Now he needs to concentrate on making his heart pure and his soul clean, what has to include admitting his sins, hopefully to the press, repenting sincerely, committing to never sinning anymore and giving his life to Jesus. If he does that, he is obviously gonna end up joining us and therefore making God's brainwashing and all else I say we need to save the world and human kind at this stage of things.

An alternative reasoning to that of the DNA being changed from female's to male's is that Mary simply acquired the characteristics that distinguished men from women according to the bible before Jesus comes in, so in the Old Testament. Two of those are being the 'head of the family' and deserving inheriting all assets of the father (since those seem to belong only to the man in the Old Testament). If a woman is changed into a man, therefore, she should have acquired the spiritual powers to command her family (possibly sharing the command with the husband) and also the spiritual merit in terms of inheritance. Nowadays, women command their homes quite frequently in democracy and capitalism, therefore in Australia, USA, England and Brazil. That would then mean they have already been changed into males. How we went from not being a Living Soul to being one is then a mystery so far, like, with the men, God breaths inside of their nostrils when they are born. We need to perhaps find another book for the Bible, either among those 15 we already identified as missing or outside of those.

I now observe that all oppressive regimens, apart from monarchy, have men on top: dictatorships seem to always have been commanded and run by men. Nazism seems to have been commanded and run by men. Islam seems to be commanded and run by men. All those commit true atrocities against human kind all the time. There is a particular dictator in South America, like in the past, who cut off hands of people, after putting them in a stadium, and made the population watch them die as they would watch a soccer game. Several hundreds. Nazism did the holocaust, which quite a few consider the worst that has ever happened to human kind. Yet I see nothing worse than Islam: About 1500 years of legal slavery of women! The black Afrikans would have been 400 years, with all the satanization that they came up with (I truly think it were many fewer years), Nazism 12 years and so on. 1500 years!? That there is nothing more horrible than Nazism?

I concluded that men end up like that, like it was also by the time of the Roman Empire (all men), therefore of those who killed Jesus, because of the ideas that get stuck in our minds from reading books like the Bible or Qoran. In Genesis, we see that 'God' created only the man at His own image and we then get that idea in the head: oh, men are holy, women are not. Yet it doesn't stop by there: 'God' actually did not want the women to be on earth. He wanted only 'Adam' and, even so, only one man, not more than one, only that one. Therefore it is a good thing for men: not having a woman. Besides, men should all compete among themselves, if possible to the point of there being only one at the top or at all, so on his own: just like 'Adam' or 'God' (from there would come ideas such as having us replaced with AI and a single man living eternally through the bug, Forever Young, commanding that army of AIs, since only then would everyone do what he wants without mistake and without complaining, like they must have noticed that even with their bugs people still do something else, like Valkyria, taught by our adored Tom Cruise, like it doesn't matter the size of the atrocity or for how long it is happening, it is just human creating some dissidence once in a while, which must have been what leads Leinha to kill 'Murillo', for instance, the fact that he always did what I asked him to do. She talks about me being much more powerful than her originally and them needing to decrease my power in any impossible way, like naturally everyone would go for the American native white woman as a leader: not the man, but the woman). That is the way to the heart of God, therefore to get more powers, allowances, etc. from heavens and who doesn't want to get the goods from heavens?

God then would have passed the order: for 'Adam' and 'Eve' not to have sex. Therefore sex is not good or wanted, according to the superior power is the message we get, what we internalize. Then 'God' forgives 'Adam' for having sex, which is something that only his wife wanted, according to the Bible, so that women make men sin, therefore be out of grace with 'God', by 'forcing' them to do something with their penises that they don't naturally want to do. Then, now understood as punishment from 'God', 'God' says, 'grow and multiply', like having kids is something similar to a curse, a toll to pay, for having sinned that badly, so that a man should not love his own kids, in the same way he should not love his wife, since she made him sin, the apple thing. To make it worse, Jesus splits husbands from wives and kids, then obviously confirming the subliminal once more: they are bad things for the men he took, things they should be kept away from because of some impossible-to-understand reason, like they are simply bad for you or something. To make it still worse, there is Revelation: 'the saved' will be only 144,000 (this from about 8 billion people and that does not cover the population not even of one Country, regardless of which one we take, more than likely) and they will still have to be virgins, so reinforcing the idea that sex with women is something that is equal to sinning, polluting their bodies, making them not be worthy of God's Holy Spirit anymore or something, not worthy of trust of God, etc.

I am sure these books, both Qoran and the Bible, have been put together by men and that, as I said before, means they would have to be imperfect, since God is wise and created one to supplement the other through marriage, one man for each woman and one woman for each man. However, they are incredibly imperfect instead, just like the other creations of groups of single men: Islam, Nazism and dictatorship. All generate incredible loss for human kind. If I said the Catholic Church should be prosecuted for crimes against humanity, perhaps we should prosecute men for those too. Now, which men, all of them? Trivially those in power everywhere on earth!

I am sure I know my God, just like I know my twin, and that is a God with a wife, the Goddess, who came from the Elohim to help and enlighten our planet. Genesis is probably completely wrong in all writings because they have been forged by groups of single men: nothing makes sense. Why was the life of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, as depicted in the Bible, something special? The father of Jesus is 'I am', from Moses, and that is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, with no mistake. The other day I reread the life of Abraham and Isaac and all I found, in terms of blessings, were lands, family (includes a perfect 'coupleship') and health. There is no wisdom. Yet everyone agrees wisdom is all: even if we don't talk about academic wisdom, we would like to know which things are better than others, what people should matter the most and so on, since decisions are made all the time and we guide our lives by these conclusions/study results.

Our God is the God of Wisdom in first place, even though He also gives a few other graces. That simply means He is NOT the God depicted in Genesis as being the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. That means that someone invented those writings instead of them being inspired by God or being a result of observation. Never made any sense that only one couple would generate the entire human kind. I then found these pieces recently (as explained before, I had studied the Bible when I was about 20yo, a whole year, but God made me internalize only 'what I needed for my life', despite me studying all as I studied books from school or university, therefore to deepest. I then did not remember these bits, therefore they are not correct), saying that the gods interacted with the descents of Adam and Eve. That makes things a little more plausible, however not entirely plausible, since those gods would have procreated in small numbers. It is obvious that such a theory is absurd: how could we generate all skin colors and languages on earth as well as phenotypical types (Asian, Afrikan, American, Indian and so on) from a single couple and why, if that comes from one god, would they invent this diversity of people and languages, like why would that be on the interest of God, who initially even wanted only one of us here, on earth? Also notice that those satanizing all invented that 'God' created 'Adam' at his own image, therefore 'simply copied', but invented 'Eve' from 'Adam's' rib instead: how is that possible? Why so different then? I also observe that the satanic invented that the sons of 'God'/watchers noticed, so all of a sudden, that some of the female humans were extremely beautiful (I now oppose this word as well, think it generates wrong vibes) and then decided to come to earth to form couples with those (it is completely irrational and there is no way a superior race, with wisdom to 'give and sell', as they say in hell/Brazil, would even think the inferior/subdued race is admirable in something apart from at most effort to reach their level. Yet men did put this idea everywhere, unfortunately, so that we could think that we can beat the devil if we are 'beautiful' enough (always brainwashing us with the idea of universal beauty, so a single human being who would be superior in physical features to all others, and only beautiful, yet, the Happy Hunters, for instance, were incredibly ugly, if our 'universal' concept of beauty is applied, and performed miracles, so were part of the so select few that got more powers of God than the rest of our kind): the devil will 'fall in love' (how can the devil love, for God's sake? the most they can have is friendship, even so never that of the best Christian friend, so never to the point of stopping their satanic program, for instance, so never to the point of doing God's brainwashing or even telling us about the devices in our heads), as in Legend, and will do anything to please us, so that we can eventually free our beloved husband from their tyranny or the things he considers to be holy, sights of heavens, such as the unicorns (in the movie).

If the devil gets attached to any of us, it is obviously to our wisdom, wisdom he literally sucks out of 'God's' creatures by stealing their soul or whatever he can with whatever means available to him, and our wisdom comes from 'God', as now explained quite a few times, so that our best chances against the devil are still going for the God of Abraham, Isaac, Moses and Jacob, and that IS NOT the god from the Catholic Bible, like perhaps pieces of Him are there, a bit here and a bit there, but there are also bits that are definitely not Him there, and that is probably what happens to most of it.

Perhaps we have to burn the entire Old Testament and definitely Qoran (already proven here to be an heinous farce) and start over. Perhaps we should start with what we know for sure, which is the feelings we have, the history of the spiritists and so on. The reports on Jesus come from people we think we know, with surnames and all else, and we are sure it is plausible that they were written like that and we also think we are sure Jesus existed since even the Jews don't deny that. It is harming us tremendously. Yet, we could keep on bothering and fix the work of the single men (useless to women, not even sex, and definitely no true wisdom): In the beginning, God created one man and one woman for each race and language he wanted to plant on earth, copying what they had in their own planet (already a bit impossible to explain, like the why they would do that. Why would they create an inferior race, which perishes quicker and is going to have to struggle to get to their level? Yet, we think it might have been for entertainment, like men create computer games), so that each couple of their gods could have 'what to play with', perhaps bored of the equals, wanting to command a few. They had sex in their planet, each husband with his wife and each wife with her husband, and with nobody else, so that they taught human kind what to do in those regards and they were initially against contraceptives and abortion because they wanted them to populate earth.

Even after adulterating so hugely the facts and messages involving God through the Catholic Bible, we still get the right message: God makes us feel inside, perform miracles and so on. It is like the so many people whose human existence the marginal killed or adulterated so badly: after learning a bit of what they do, from even living that, we become able to guess what is usurpation and what isn't, God gives us, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (who are not those from the Bible). We get the truth before we can actually prove it and quite a few times we are able to prove it, despite all satanization. Some things would be right in the Bible, would have come from God, such as this advice: for us to do our share, since He then will help. We make the effort, go through the sacrifices involved to synchronize with His heart and He then gives us the true knowledge, the insight and so on.

This is the Final Battle, also between genders: it is clearly the case that men started it. Some men were probably impotent (in the same way 'Vinicius de Moraes', a man who should be a true artist, therefore would absolutely never think like that, and a man who was himself very ugly, considering our universal standards for masculine beauty, would have said, 'As muito feias que me perdoem, mas beleza é fundamental' (the very ugly women go forgive me, but beauty is fundamental), the women would have said, 'the impotent go forgive me, but being able to have an erect penis and being able to generate and have sexual pleasure through love is fundamental', so the 'making love' of the Holy American people. While the former cannot ever be true, and probably proves usurpation has happened there, since we all know an artist sees beauty everywhere and anywhere all the time, even in domestic violence (Suzanne Vega), the latter is definitely true and everyone on earth feels that. Lucky that with the device we can heal quite a few cases of impotence!) and they then were deemed useless by women or did not even risk it, already knowing that Eve would be all about the apples, basically (they themselves said it, just like Jesus said).

I am sure that if we study the sexual life and performance of the leaders of those atrocious regimens we will confirm all this: sex once a year with the wife, even so only for procreation, would be the Hare Krishna's thing, again invented exclusively by men. When it was good being in misery and begging is when it was good having sex like that if you are a couple, basically. I will bet the replacement of Hitler had sex once a week, like most cariocas, with the wife. 'Nelson', the non-black one, told me he and his current wife play 'sex games' exactly once a week and I emphasize that he said 'sex games', and playing, not having sex. I am sure having a wife and constant sexual interaction with her, inside of respect, of the laws we created, with a pure heart and clean soul, connecting to God, creates love, just like the Holy American people invented. If love is created, it inhabits within and that prevents you from being a monster with others of your kind, perhaps in general. Besides, you then create a direct communication line with God, with the beyond, each time you hit the highest keys of love, therefore each time your spirits are made one as you had sex, what can only be achieved through those items, pure heart, clean soul, connection to God, and so on, and that, allied to continuous feeding of this love through actions, such as companionship displays, and other proofs of togetherness and mutual care, empathy and so on, makes God bless you each time you make the right amount of effort in terms of health, wisdom and all else. The message of God in 2002 was clear: we need to do some good every day. At least one good action per day. He does not impose rules as to the target of the good action, so that you may even be good just to your wife or husband, but you do have to be good also through actions each day of your life. God is not perfect and He find it difficult to communicate with human kind, to the point of sending Himself incarnated and getting to the impossibility of teaching us even so, then trying to have us eating directly from his flesh and blood. I think that if men had not perverted His words, He would think it was possible. Once more, who wrote Genesis, who was there to see and take note? How could any third party, from later on, reproduce with no mistake what they said? Yet they have quotation marks there all the way through...it is not a mystery: it is a fact. It was all forged. Nothing genuine.