Contradictions and Falsehoods in the Islamic Bible

https://centerforinquiry.org/blog/contradictions-and-inconsistencies-in-the-quran/ Here we find some contradictions of weight, such as that involving how many days it took Alah to create heavens and earth: a piece of the Islamic bible says six days, another two pieces says four. We also find some gibberish such as the Cosmological Flaws. Alah believes that the earth is flat like a carpet but we know that is not true. Perhaps the Flat Earth people follow Islam when they claim to believe such. Alah can only be a false God in the same sense that a false prophet is acknowledged as such on his or her first wrong prophecy or promise (they say they will heal somebody and the person is not healed or others). Alah is told to be omniscicent: https://www.al-islam.org/islamic-doctrines-simplified/allah-omniscient, “Say: Do you instruct Allah about your religion? But Allah knows all that is in the heavens and on the earth; Allah is Knowing of all things” Holy Qur'an (49:16)

We have just proven Allah is not knowing of all things, so that the Qoran lies and deceives.

We still have the Islamic who left Islam after watching David Wood's YouTube video, where he explains, through sacred texts extracts, that Islam is a farce (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6st_tFj6ouM&list=PLYkmH0MHfYpjYbTY6CacSsEKrMdNTm4Cw): he says that what he was taught at an Islamic school was that Mohammed died from asking God to kill him at old age. That frontally opposes the writing on the sources presented by David in his video, which explain that Mohammed was poisoned by a Jewish woman whose husband was killed by him.

There is also this one: https://carm.org/islam/contradictions-in-the-quran/

On the last source, we find delightful surprises as well: Alah would have created man out of blood, “Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood,” (96:2) on a piece of their bible and out of sounding clay on another piece: “We created man from sounding clay, from mud moulded into shape, (15:26)." Yet on another two pieces, he would have created man out of nothing: “But does not man call to mind that We created him before out of nothing?” (19:67, Yusuf Ali). Also, 52:35. Yet on another piece, he would have created man out of sperm: “He has created man from a sperm-drop; and behold this same (man) becomes an open disputer! (16:4)".

According to the same source, the Islamic bible brings at least two different names for the first Islamic man, Moses and Muhammad: “And I [Muhammad] am commanded to be the first of those who bow to Allah in Islam,” (39:12). “When Moses came to the place appointed by Us, and his Lord addressed him, He said: “O my Lord! show (Thyself) to me, that I may look upon thee.” Allah said: “By no means canst thou see Me (direct); But look upon the mount; if it abide in its place, then shalt thou see Me.” When his Lord manifested His glory on the Mount, He made it as dust. And Moses fell down in a swoon. When he recovered his senses he said: “Glory be to Thee! to Thee I turn in repentance, and I am the first to believe.” (7:143).

Contradictions in their bible, a book written at least 600 years after the Christian bible, claimed to be exactly the words of Alah, without any adulteration (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbbaxUC4eSQ from 3:57 onwards), are never-ending and therefore Alah is a false god, therefore those to write the book lied about it coming from the creator of heavens and earth, so that the 'Islamic Nation' is founded on deceit, just as it would be if it had come from the devil: the devil is deceit, is cheating and is lies. The Quran therefore should be classified at most from now on as the bible of the devil, maybe the same one we have in https://www.loc.gov/item/2021667604, which is also called codex (check the previous website). To make it infinitely perfect, we do find at least one source saying that an alternative name for the Quran is codex: https://yaqeeninstitute.org/read/paper/the-first-codex-abu-bakrs-compilation-of-the-quran.

The question about why we should put an end to Islam is answered with: blacks and women form a 'team' that is more numerous than white men and therefore logic implies that those must command more in terms of which religions or religious books are acceptable or shouldn't be destroyed/exterminated. Blacks were enslaved to serve Mohammad, the greatest prophet of Islam, and at least one of the sacred texts from Islam says that blacks are the worst of all creations: “’Ubaidullah b. Abu Rafi’, the freed slave of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), said: […] The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) described their characteristics and I found these characteristics in them. They state the truth with their tongue, but it does not go beyond this part of their bodies (and the narrator pointed towards his throat). The most hateful among the creation of Allah is one black man among them (Khawarij). One of his hand is like the teat of a goat or the nipple of the breast.” (Book 12, Hadith 205, as seen on https://sunnah.com/muslim:1066g).

Yet, we also have the laws of democracy and capitalism: if Islam is acceptable in other countries, those could never be Australia, Brazil or United States, since it is a basic principle of democracy that everyone, so absolutely everyone, is equal before the law. It is a criminal religion, through which all sorts of atrocities against women and blacks are made licit or acceptable or justifiable. Some sources say that whites had the idea of enslaving blacks because of Islam, mainly Muhammad's life.

Besides, it is now proven in several places, and in a very solid manner, that Islam is a farce, their books cannot be respected, are irrational and humans would like to defend that they have rationality, what differentiates them from the animal and still make them superior, what then gives them the right to enslave the animal (pets or farms being an example) or do anything they want to do with them (some rights have already been recognized by the laws in democracy, such as rights to being well treated if they are pets, but there are lots missing to make their slavery be acceptable on a spiritual level, so here defending that animals also have a soul. For instance, they still force animals to have sex with each other, any two animals, randomly chosen everywhere on earth).

Let's please save women from slavery after at least 1,500 years of absurd licit slavery over them in at least all Islamic countries, let's declare via United Nations that Islam is the enemy of the world and must be exterminated, that nobody can be allowed to choose such a religion because it is not a religion, it is a weapon to oppress and violate blacks and women and the United Nations decided that men and women as well as whites and blacks are equal.