Reincarnation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmDcpnQGO3A brings a bit about the topic. We then have 3 psychologists and 1 psychiatrist who defend reincarnation: they studied the matter also from a scientific point of view. Raymond Moody is a psychologist and a PhD, Linda Backman is a psychologist and a regression therapist, Ian Stevenson was a pscychologist and Jim Tucker is a psychiatrist. Ian got a grant of 1 million of dollars to disprove reincarnation but, upon studying the matter, ended up becoming one of the strongest supporters of that theory. Jim found the case of a boy who told his family he had been shot in the head while riding a bike in his previous life and he then told them his previous name and all else. They then took him to the place where he said he lived and found a family who told them exactly that story about their son and the boy was still born with 2 marks on his head, one to the front and another to the back, which were compatible with the way he had been shot, like with the marks he should have acquired. Yet, they took 'this way of proving', so the how they could be proving spiritism in a final way, from my head, like they actually asked me, using the bug: what sort of evidence could be final for people to get convinced of life after death in the shape of spirit being true. I then don't believe this proof very much. Yet there would be many other convincing proofs. I totally believe our twinhood was tied in the spiritual world, so before birth.

We observe that even if there is life after death in the shape of spirit and things go in the way spiritists have told us for many years now, the marginal will then say that they can last forever in the human shape using their own Forever Young (they got the result many years ago. Each new generation of bugs means a new terrorist group so far. We hoped (I had no idea I already had 2 bugs in my head and so did the love of my life, my 1/2, when I proposed Forever Young: they had completely wiped off my memories. They gave them back to me in 2020 and that is the only reason as to why my original plans are not working so well. I did not have the information that I would need to have to plan this to a point of not failing) our generation of the bug (I had no idea there were several generations of bugs before ours, so that I am saying this here, 'our generation', but that comes from current knowledge only, not from when I planned all, in that 2001) would be entirely ours, therefore God's bug, the one that would save human kind from slavery and all the other monstruosities we endure and would convert the bug into a good thing, something for us all to enjoy and use in our favor as we please, just inside of the constraints of the law), so that they won't really burn in hell: they won't actually die...

There was a YouTube the other day in my default for YouTube with a title that meant they had a strategy for us to use to prove reincarnation. Even though I got seriously interested, I did not click on the link that day and today I am unable to locate it. We intend to go through religion in Marcia Hope if time allows (we think of exposing and solving the issues involving the head devices, as a top priority, then talk about the satanic crimes (things like multiples and usurpation), then study/discuss major religious issues (Bible and Islam, soul and spirit, life after death, etc.) and then discuss/study plus solve other social problems, such as health and welfare).

If the spiritists were right about how life goes after death, we would live in a much more rational world, therefore we would like to prove they are right. However, we would like to be on stage to really prove things when it comes to religious matters, so that we may not deal with reincarnation due to the difficulty of actually doing that. We would like to prioritize fixing what we can fix during a show that will last only for one year, as for us presenting it/creating the model for the Marcia Hopes.

I now know (since 2020) that I actually watched the original Marcia Ricci Pinheiro being murdered when I was less than 6 yo. I then 'assumed her ID', as normal usurpation goes, however they erased my memories, so that I would not remember that until the Enmore house (2020). The thing is that she never came back in spirit to haunt me in any possible way. Yet, that would have to be a sudden death: they bugged her before 'forcing her to do their script' and I think she was then forced, via device, to move her body in a certain way, when they then froze her/gave her phase out. 'Hamish' (from Adelaide, Unilodge) was standing at the back of 'our house' in Ipanema, Porto Alegre, RS, facing the end of the back of the house. 'Braganca' then directed me to the front of Hamish and to the in-between him and the original 'Marcia Ricci Pinheiro'. He then stayed for a moment at the back of the house, more or less at the same height as Hamish, also facing the end of the back of the house. 'Hamish' then said 'my name', 'Marcia', and I then starred at him. Then I sensed 'Braganca' moving and turned to see him. He then directed himself to above Marcia and killed her. If I am spiritist, I would say she knew nothing about what was happening when she died, was completely unaware, so that she had no reference point to come back to, so that is how I would explain the fact that she never haunted me.

Yet, they also killed lots of people who were not bugged, such as those in 'our house' in Atlantic City. The couple's female thought she was connected by blood to our mother. I never heard them telling me of any of those coming back to haunt them. Once we get God's brainwashing going, if the marginal is still with the same ID and alive, we can simply invite them to the stage or interview them wherever they are from it and ask: they should then tell the truth and we can then trust their answer. They are serial killers and we can then see if there is any chance the spiritists are correct, since then the death of the person would have been traumatizing. The woman who thought she was our relative watched the male figuring as her husband in the house having his throat sliced. The blood came out of his throat as if it were a very volumous fall. She then, not knowing what to do, in shock in the beginning, tried to hold his blood with her hands, what she did until her own throat got cut by the Leinha involved (Australian one). The Leinha involved then said something to the extent of making the couple's female know that she wouldn't let her exist without him before she put the knife on her throat as well.

I do believe that, if we are able to locate the marginal, and God's brainwashing is on, we can go through every possible scenario that the spiritists claim would generate sure visit of the spirit after the death of the body, when we will then know for sure if such a thing exists. What is not missing is murder that they can tell us about...One could say it would be hard for the spirit to locate them, since they keep on changing identity, but we would think spirits mark spirits as well, not human IDs, isn't it? Some were raped, kept in confinement, had part of their legs chopped, stayed like that for a few days, bled on their own in confinement, no clothes, no food, no nothing, until they were killed, so that suffering is also what is not missing for certain victims, like because they say that if the murder is cruel they come back, as far as I know.

We can also ask the marginal about the so many spiritists whose heads they controlled via device, like we then ask if they were getting their information from beyond the human body or from inside of it, for instance. We can actually learn from the marginal about that too: how we can tell the difference between one situation and another. We can then use the bug of the spiritist, whose contacts with the beyond are most believed, and prove these things in real time.

I have only seen charlatans during my so few contacts with those who claim to speak to spirits. I also don't believe their words because, for instance, I watched some sessions in Melbourne that repeated (same words said, like same details about the spirit and same questions asked to the audience, where there seems to be always someone who says it is me). I once saw things from the perspective of those who are trying to work with them, like trying to be a fellow, and I then noticed some of us would jump and say it is me when nobody else was doing that for a time from the question being asked (they give information about the spirit, at most they say a first name, they refine the information with each new token, and I am then calling that a question).

The most famous medium Brazil ever had was called Chico Xavier (born in Minas Gerais, according to Wikipedia). People would make never-ending cues to speak to him. He would write entire books about the person he was asked to contact in the beyond. I once skimmed through one of his books, I think it was at the apartment of 'Marcello Catardo' (the man I once dated, when I was a teen. He claimed to have an imaginary friend at that height of life and he would be about 13 yo. He said the name of his imaginary friend was Kevin and I now think I am sure that would be Kevin Bacon because of conversations with Leinha, so that he was surely bugged), and thought the information on it was way too generic. Yet, those books looked very convincing for the families that got them. Chico worked for free: didn't charge for any of his sessions, as Alan Kardec says they should do. That also has to mean something, like way more evidence to the side of it not being charlatanism.

The Bible mentions necromancers as if they could really tell the future, give sound advice and so on. Spiritism has been around for an enormous amount of years and they have a lot of literature on the topic. It does create an impression of it all being solid. Since it is also extremely logical, the most logical theory about our lives and how things could go after death, were there one of the Elohim responsible for all or even all of them, it must be true for that part, of life after death. Notwithstanding, we do think we need more proof than what we have so far.

We have seen, by now, many miracles of demons: two magicians in particular, Dynamo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRb4pSXYsgU and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4rqbPACV5I) and Criss Angel, both available on YouTube, can walk on water, cross gates, fly, walk on walls and even fall from buildings of 4 floors and not die or suffer any scratch. They claim to have a pact with a demon. That is something I spoke to Trevor about: I was curious as to how this thing works, so that I proposed they got a few young men and asked them to go through the rites necessary to tie a deal with the devil and that they then showed us what they could get that way. I believe these two are in this proposal. I am sure all of us would like to do these things and it is pretty sad that God would not offer them.

Jesus walked over water and the Jews asked us to call him Yeshua, which is apparently demon in Hebrew, so that must be why some say Jesus was the devil. Yet, neither Criss Angel nor Dynamo help or give wisdom to anyone: people with pacts with demons shouldn't really wish for helping. Rather the contrary: Criss has killed someone and has cut off the hand of someone else on 2 of his YouTubes, like for real, pretending it all to be magic. If the demoniac start healing the sick, ressurecting the dead and giving us wisdom, multiplying food, like Jesus used to, after God's brainwashing is on and their bugs are out of their heads, then we may start believing that Jesus made a pact with the devil in the desert, as some say, or even that he was the own demon, as some of the Jews want us to believe. Notwithstanding, I doubt it very much.

Leinha talks about a ceremony ran on two sides, which made me think one side was the living and the other the dead: she then seems to imply the black 'Nelson' or someone like him got the spirit of a certain demoniac creature in them after that. I would like to then interview Leinha on stage, after God's brainwashing is on, and get her to tell us all with due names on it. We would then check the name of the demoniac entity they claim to have taken the body of the person, whoever they may be, study what we have recorded about them, then check whoever it is, say 'Nelson', and compare 'miracles' or something. That would then be to investigate invocation followed by possession.

If we prove spiritism is correct belief in what regards life after death, we can then use it to find out the consequences of having a pact with demons or the devil through the spiritists' literature and interview those who have a pact with demons, so say Criss and Dynamo, to learn also from them the price they pay. Provided God's brainwashing is happening, we should be OK. We can also ask them, provided God's brainwashing is happening, if the miracles come from the bug, since I did 'fly' a little with the devil when we jumped from 'Nelson's' spaceship to a building in front of the UTS together (I would have to interview the devil, after God's brainwashing is on, so that we find out if I was really there or my bug was synched with the bug of a doll or something. They did put me inside of the body of other kids a couple of times, so that I would try to move 'my arm', for instance, and wouldn't succeed. With a lot of difficulty, I would get some movement from the arm of 'the host' basically. Yet, the devil or 'Braganca' would still have flown a little in that case), like we can do that for starters, so that we only progress if they confirm that the bug has nothing to do with it.

We can obviously take suggestions from the public regarding what else we could be investigating and we will have lines (fax, e-mail, chat and telephone) open to the public 24/7 with people assessing each request at least during 8 hours of each weekday (it will be only weekdays, probably four hours each day). We will announce the next stage broadly and in advance, so that people can think about it.

Here we have some argumentation as to Reincarnation being something mentioned in the Bible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf6pxg-THjc&t=1s.. Passages say things such as 'through the washing of rebirth', 'born again' and 'then the disciples understood he was talking about John the Baptist' (that would be Elija, therefore the reincarnation of Elija).

Here we have mention to the Dead Sea Scrolls (the presenter says that the Scrolls could have been written by the Essenes and most scholars believe they were. Then he says that many believe the Essenes had reincarnation as part of their beliefs because they talk about rebirth of the soul and about receiving the soul back after death. There is also mention to Melchizedek Redivivus and Redivivus seems to translate into 'born again', so that we could think that is reincarnation. Yet this Redivivus part seems to be an object of discussion): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsILXkHAFvY

In the blog post Scriptures: Which Ones, from this very blog, there is a video about some of the missing books of the Bible and they then mention some books written by the Seers. In the video of the previous paragraph, the presenter says the Seers were the equivalent to mediums. We then wonder why they wouldn't have used the same word they had in the Old Testament, so necromancer.

The presenter also mentions prohibition of writing any book containing references to reincarnation, so that reincarnation was a topic that could never be included in the Bible and it seems that it was previously included in the holy writings.

More: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMHpIVclE5A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz0SQk5R57Q - Jesus received the tag, 'King of the Jews', on the cross and he preached in sinagogues, therefore Jewish temples, but not in temples of any other religion. He also did not talk about founding any other religion, so that it DOES look like he supported only the Jewish religion. According to this video and Rabbi, the Jewish do believe in reincarnation. They seem to think people can come back in the body of a vegetable or animal, depending on how bad their sins were before death (bad people may come back as animals: were animals, then here they will be for real those). He says that the Kabbalah talks about these things. They also believe in possession: that the bodies that don't want to die generate a soul that comes back to possess people.

Just like Catholicism, Judaism seems to forbid people from initiating communication with the dead, different from spiritism. Yet, in both Catholicism and Judaism, the 'holy books' describe instances of consultation with the dead (necromancer in the Bible and 1 Samuel 28 in the Jewish books). Judaism preaches that spiritism and consultation with the dead and mediums is detestable to the Lord. The Bible says doing those things make us be impure.

We must notice that several religions appeared many years after Jesus' Christ's death, so that they were not really around when Jesus walked among us and therefore, if they existed in year 0, perhaps Jesus would have chosen one of those instead of Judaism. Spiritism appeared by the 1800s (https://study.com/academy/lesson/spiritism-overview-beliefs-facts.html#:~:text=Spiritism%20is%20an%20occult%20religion,where%20it%20is%20called%20Espiritismo). Catholicism appeared by 590 CE (https://www.learnreligions.com/roman-catholic-church-history-700528). What we mean here is that, considering all religions that existed in year 0, Jesus thought that the closest one to what God expected or wanted from us was Judaism but one of the religions that appeared from year 1 onward could be a better match than Judaism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyqWllIgkn4 - some evidence on the soul coming back to life after death of the human body. Some more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q7eAV3N764, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzItboInv3w, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0VsIeBw7OI, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eX3z18m5sE, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiziAOl7ul8, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q7eAV3N764

A more convincing case than any other (the reincarnation of Anne Frank): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_Qx2-kUODY Yet, I now remember Leinha asking me questions about this case, like what could she do to prove she was the reincarnation of a woman who had been a writer and wrote a book when she was 12 yo. Since she put the entire situation to me back then, that was probably one more of the satanic illusions: she then bugged the girl and created the narrative by brainwashing her and so on. This is to then show the value of the brainwashing, that it really really sticks to the person's mind, to the point of the person swearing they are such or did something because they genuinely wanted. May God bless!